Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of solid adsorbent and stainless steel canister sampling for very low ppt-concentrations of aromatic compounds (≥C6) in ambient air from remote areas

Vergleich der Probenahme mit festen Adsorbentien oder Kanistern aus rostfreiem Stahl für sehr niedrige ppt-Konzentrationen aromatischer Verbindungen (≥C6) in der Umgebungsluft abgelegener Gebiete

  • Original Papers
  • Environmental Analyses
  • Published:
Fresenius' Zeitschrift für analytische Chemie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The applicability of stainless steel canister and solid adsorbent sampling has been studied for very low concentrations (> 15 ppt) of compounds ≥ C6 in ambient air samples from remote areas (Arctic). Different cleaning methods were tested to get sufficiently low blank values for the solid adsorbents Tenax TA and Carbotrap for benzene and toluene. Two techniques are described based on high-vacuum or hot air pretreatment which lowered the blank to less than 1 ppt (sampling volume 10 and 60 l, respectively). Sufficiently low blanks could be maintained for a storage period of at least 1 week. However, this required a careful selection of suitable sealing and tube materials. Furthermore, the long-term stability of samples collected with electropolished stainless steel bottles was tested. No losses were observed for benzene and toluene during 1 month storage. Quantitative analysis was carried out by combining thermodesorption or cryogenic enrichment with high resolution gas chromatography. Both sampling techniques are suitable for very low ppt-concentrations of benzene and toluene but their application range is complementary (e.g. grab sampling versus sampling over longer periods). A detailed description of all working procedures and methods is given including blanks and reproducibility data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schnell RC (ed) (1984) Geophys Res Lett 11:359–472

  2. Barrie LA (1986) Atmos Environ 20:643–663

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hov Ø, Penkett SA, Isaksen ISA, Semb A (1984) Geophys Res Lett 11:425–428

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pacyna JM, Oehme M (1988) Atmos Environ 22:243–257

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schmidbauer N, Oehme M (1986) J High Res Chromatogr Chromatogr Comm 9:502–505

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bertsch W, Chang RC, Zlatkis A (1974) J Chromatogr Sci 12:175–182

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krost KJ, Pellizzari ED, Walburn SG, Hubbard SA (1982) Anal Chem 54:810–817

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crist LH, Mitchell WJ (1986) Environ Sci Technol 20:1260–1262

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pellizzari E, Demian B, Krost K (1984) Anal Chem 56:793–798

    Google Scholar 

  10. MacLeod G, Ames JM (1986) J Chromatogr 355:393–398

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kirschmer P (1983) Bestimmung der Halogen-Kohlenwasserstoffe C1–C6 in unbelasteter Trophosphäre mittels adsorptiver Anreicherung und thermischer Desorption. Dissertation, Universität Ulm

  12. Schmidbauer N, Oehme M (1987) J High Res Chromatogr Chromatogr Comm 10:398–400

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brown RH, Purnell CJ (1979) J Chromatogr 178:79–90

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ciccioli P, Brancaleoni E, Cecinata A, DiPalo C, Bracchetti A, Liberti A (1986) J Chromatogr 351:433–449

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidbauer, N., Oehme, M. Comparison of solid adsorbent and stainless steel canister sampling for very low ppt-concentrations of aromatic compounds (≥C6) in ambient air from remote areas. Z. Anal. Chem. 331, 14–19 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00473888

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00473888

Keywords

Navigation