Marine Biology

, Volume 102, Issue 4, pp 565–572 | Cite as

Abundance of Fucus spiralis and ephemeral seaweeds in a high eulittoral zone: effects of grazers, canopy and substratum type

  • A. R. O. Chapman


According to a widely accepted view of intertidal community organization in the north-west Atlantic Ocean, the abundance of perennial seaweeds is regulated by the activities of herbivores (which control ephemeral algal competitors) and carnivores (which control populations of competing filterfeeders). This concept was examined in 1987–1988 in a eulittoral belt on the Atlantic shores of Nova Scotia, Canada, dominated by a closed canopy of Fucus spiralis. A factorial design was used to test the effects of (a) grazers (there were no carnivores present, (b) adult F. spiralis canopy, and (c) substratum type on the abundance of perennial and ephemeral seaweeds. Grazers had no significant (p>0.05) effect on the density or cover of juvenile F. spiralis, but significantly reduced canopy cover of adults through the winter. The presence of grazers significantly enhanced the cover of ephemeral algae in early spring. Barnacle presence enhanced the cover of juvenile F. spiralis, but reduced the canopy of adult plants through abrasion. The most important regulator of recruitment density in F. spiralis was the presence of a canopy of conspecific adults. Canopy greatly reduced juvenile development. There was no significant relationship between the covers of perennial F. spiralis and ephemeral seaweeds. This study demonstrates that the recruitment of the perennial rockweed population examined is not dependent on the activities consumer animals. The results contrast with work in the midshore intertidal of New England, where the activities of herbivores are thought to regulate the abundances of perennial seaweeds.


Atlantic Ocean Early Spring Canopy Cover Nova Scotia Community Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Branch, G. M. (1981). The biology of limpets: physical factors, energy flow and ecological interactions. Oceanogr. mar. Biol. A. Rev. 19: 235–280Google Scholar
  2. Carpenter, R. (1986). Partitioning herbivory and its effects on coral reef algal communities. Ecol. Mongr. 56: 345–363Google Scholar
  3. Grant, W. S. (1977). High intertidal community organization on a rocky headland in Maine, USA. Mar. Biol. 44: 15–25Google Scholar
  4. Hawkins, S. J., Hartnoll, R. G. (1983). Grazing of intertidal algae by marine invertebrates. Oceanogr. mar. Biol. A. Rev. 21: 195–282Google Scholar
  5. Littler, M. M., Littler, D. S. (1980). The evolution of thallus form and survival strategies in benthic marine algae: field and laboratory tests of a functional form model. Am. Nat. 116: 25–44Google Scholar
  6. Lubchenco, J. (1980). Algal zonation in the New England rocky intertidal community: an experimental analysis. Ecology 61: 331–344Google Scholar
  7. Lubchenco, J.: (1982). Effects of grazers and algal competitors on fucoid colonization in tide pools. J. Phycol. 18: 544–550Google Scholar
  8. Lubchenco, J. (1983). Littorina and Fucus: effects of herbivores, substratum heterogeneity and plant escapes during succession. Ecology 64: 1116–1123Google Scholar
  9. Lubchenco, J. (1986). Relative importance of competition and predation: early colonization by seaweeds in New England. In: Diamond, J., Case, T. J. (eds.) Community ecology. Harper & Row, New York, p. 537–555Google Scholar
  10. Lubchenco, J., Menge, B. A. (1978). Community development and persistence in a low rocky intertidal zone. Ecol. Monogr. 48: 67–94Google Scholar
  11. Menge, B. A. (1978). Predation intensity in a rocky intertidal community: relation between predator forging activity and environmental harshness. Oecologia 34: 1–16Google Scholar
  12. Parker, T. (1987). The roles of gammarid amphipods and littorinid snails in high intertidal tide pools dominated by Fucus distichus. M. Sc. thesis, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S., CanadaGoogle Scholar
  13. Robertson, B. C. (1987). Reproductive ecology and canopy structure of Fucus spiralis L. Botanica mar. 30: 475–482Google Scholar
  14. Stocker, L. (1986). Artifactual effects of caging on the recruitment and survivorship of a subtidal colonial invertebrate. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 34: 305–307Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. R. O. Chapman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations