Abstract
In the wake of increased environmental and sustainability concerns associated with agricultural development, developing countries are faced with the dilemma of choice between the short-run technological gains and the long-run environmental conservation. A dynamic investment decision model is developed to optimize the use of scarce public investment funds in the magagement of irrigation water supply, depth to water table and soil salinity. Four major classes of investments with different impacts on the hydrological balance within the Indus basin are considered: (a) expansion of the surface irrigation network, (b) public drainage projects, (c) tax and subsidy policies designed to influence the rate of private groundwater exploitation and (d) investment in improving the efficiency of the existing canal system by reducing conveyance losses. The crop area lost due to water logging and salt accumulation is treated as a damage cost of increasing the application of surface irrigation water. The resulting optimality conditions from the model are used to assess the development and operation of public drainage projects. The model results are compared for areas underlain by fresh and saline groundwater. The model is also used to analyze recent policy debate which has focused on the use of incentives such as subsidized credit, energy subsidies, and electrical grid expansion to accomplish the transfer of tubewell operation from the public to the private sector. Optimal switching conditions for such transfers are derived. The results show that a private farmer's optimal decision will diverge more from the societal optimal decision as more externalities from surface irrigation are accounted for.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BabuS. C., NivasB. T. and Rajasekaran: (1992) Groundwater pollution from agrochemicals — A dynamic model of externalities and policy options, Water Resour. Manage. 6, 1–15.
ChiangA.: 1992, Elements of Dynamic Optimization, McGraw-Hill, New York.
ClarkC.: 1985, Mathematical Bioeconomics, Academic Press, New York.
CropperM. and OatesW.: 1992, Economic theory and environment, J. Econom. Lit. 30, 647–725.
CrossonP. R.: 1992, Sustainable agriculture, in J.Darmstadter (ed.), Global Development and the Environmental Perspectives on Sustainability, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
FrederickK. D.: 1992, Managing water for economic, environmental, and human health, in J.Darmstadter (ed.), Global Development and the Environment Perspectives on Sustainability, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
JohnsonS. H.: 1988, Large-scale irrigation and drainage schemes in Pakistan, in G.O'Mara (ed.), Efficiency in Irrigation, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
KamienM. I. and SchwartzN. C.: 1992, Dynamic Optimization, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Le Moigne, G., Barghouti., Feder, G., Garbus. L. and Xie, M.: 1992, Country experiences with water resources management, World Bank Technical Paper, 175, Washington D.C., pp 223.
MarkandyaA. and PearceD.W.: 1991, Development, the environment, and the social rate of discount, The World Bank Research Observer 6(2), 137–152.
O'MaraG. T.: 1988, The efficient use of surface water and groundwater in irrigation: An overview of the issues, in O'MaraG. T. (ed.), Efficiency in Irrigation — The Conjunctive Use of Surface and Groundwater Resources, the World Bank, Washington D.C.
TuP. N. V.: 1992, Introductory Dynamic Optimization, Springer-Verlag, London.
World Bank: 1992, Development and the environment, World Development Report 1992, World Bank, Washington D.C.
World Bank: 1984, Pakistan review of the sixth five-year plan, A World Bank Country Study, World Bank, Washington D.C.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Babu, S.C., Nivas, B.T. & Traxler, G.J. Irrigation development and environmental degradation in developing countries — a dynamic model of investment decisions and policy options. Water Resour Manage 10, 129–146 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00429683
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00429683