Skip to main content
Log in

Not all ctenophores are hermaphrodites. Studies on the systematics, distribution, sexuality and development of two species of Ocyropsis

  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The lobate ctenophores Ocyropsis maculata and O. crystallina are not simultaneous hermaphrodites, based on morphological, histological and experimental evidence. Sex ratios in populations, sex ratios of size classes within populations, and average sizes of males and females support the hypothesis that both species are dioecious, rather than sequential hermaphrodites. We have divided each species into two subspecies, based on morphology and geographic distribution. Preliminary evidence suggests that the subspecies also differ in reproductive behavior. One subspecies, O. crystallina guttata, spawns on a daily cycle in the laboratory, and spawning becomes more synchronous when males and females are placed together. Species of Ocyropsis, all of which are oceanic in distribution, are probably descended from a common ancestor that was a simultaneous hermaphrodite. That this group of oceanic ctenophores evolved dioecy directly contradicts the assertion that there is a selective advantage to hermaphroditism in environments where the probability of finding a mate is reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Backus, R. H. and J. E. Craddock: Pelagic faunal provinces and sound-scattering levels in the Atlantic Ocean. In: Oceanic sound scattering prediction, pp 529–547. Ed. by N. Andersen and B. Zahuranec. New York: Plenum Press 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, R. D.: Invertebrate zoology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Coll. 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, H. B.: Medusae from the Maldive Islands. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harvard 39 (9), 245–269, pl. 8 (1904)

    Google Scholar 

  • Childress, J. J.: Oceanic biology: lost in space? In: Oceanography the present and the future, pp 127–135. Ed. by P. G. Brewer. Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag 1983

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, S.-Y.: On the metamorphosis of the ctenophore Ocyropsis crystallina (Rang) from Amoy. Acta zool. sinica 15 (1), 10–16 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, C.: Ctenophoren des Golfes von Neapel. Fauna Flora Golf Neapel 1, 313 pp., 16 pls. (1880)

  • Dawydoff, C.: Les coeloplanides indochinoises. Arch. Zool. gén. 80, 125–162 (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawydoff, C.: Contribution a la connaissance des ctenophores pelagiques des eaux de l'Indochine. Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg. 90, 113–170 (1946)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawydoff, C.: Observations sur la metamorphose d'Ocyropsis, ctenophore archilobe de la faune indochinoise. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris. 226, 1105–1106 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eschscholtz, F.: System der Acalephen. Berlin: F. Dümmler 1829

    Google Scholar 

  • Fewkes, J. W.: XI. Report on the Acalephae. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool., Harvard 8 (7), 127–140, 4 pls. (1881)

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, G. R. and G. Reynolds: The development of bioluminescence in the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi. Dev. Biol. 31, 61–100 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gegenbaur, C.: Studien über Organisation und Systematik der Ctenophoren. Arch. Naturgesch. 22, 163–205, pls. 7–8 (1856)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T.: The economy of nature and the evolution of sex, pp 118–125. Berkeley: University of California Press 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. J. and T. L. Simpson: Sex reversal in a freshwater sponge. J. exp. Zool. 195, 145–151 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamner, W. M., L. P. Madin, A. L. Alldredge, R. W. Gilmer and P. P. Hamner: Underwater observations of gelatinous zooplankton: sampling problems, feeding biology and behavior. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20, 907–917 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison, G. R.: 6. On the classification and evolution of the Ctenophora. In: The origins and relationships of lower invertebrates, pp 78–100. Ed. by S. C. Morris, J. D. George, R. Gibson and H. M. Platt. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1984

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison, G. R. and L. P. Madin: Diving — a new view of plankton biology. Oceanus 22, 21–27 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison, G. R. and L. P. Madin: The Ctenophora. In: Synopsis and classification of living organisms, pp 707–715, pls. 68–69. Ed. by S. P. Parker, New York: McGraw-Hill 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison, G. R., L. P. Madin and N. R. Swanberg: On the natural history and distribution of oceanic ctenophores. Deep-Sea Res. 25, 233–256 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, A.: The open sea; its natural history, 2 vols, 2nd ed. London: Collins 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, D. J.: Simultaneous hermaphrotidism: cost and benefit. Theor. Biol. 64, 363–373 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, L. H.: The invertebrates: protozoa through ctenophora. New York: McGraw-Hill 1940

    Google Scholar 

  • Komai, T.: On ctenophores of the neighbourhood of Misaki. Annot. Zool. Japan 9, 451–474. pl. 7 (1918)

    Google Scholar 

  • Komai, T.: Notes on Coeloplana bocki n. sp. and its development. Annot. Zool. Japan 9, 575–584 (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  • Komai, T.: Studies on two aberrant Ctenophores, Coeloplana and Gastrodes, Kyoto: Published by the author 1922

  • Komai, T.: A note on the phylogeny of the Ctenophora. In: The lower metazoa: comparative biology and phylogeny, pp 181–188. Ed. by E. C. Dougherty. Berkeley: Univ. of Calif. Press 1963

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, P. and S. W. Nixon: Distribution and abundance of the ctenophore, Mnemiopsis leidyi in Narragansett Bay. Estuar. cstl mar. Sci. 4, 627–639 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krempf, A.: Sur un cténophore planariforme nouveau Coeloplana gonoctena (nov. sp.). Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 171, 438–440 (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krempf, A.: Coeloplana gonoctena: biologie, organisation, développement. Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg. 54, 252–312 (1921)

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumbach, T.: Zweiter Unterstamm der Coelenterata Acnidaria — Collaria — Greifzellentiere. In: Handbuch der Zoologie, vol. 1, pp 902–995. Ed. by W. Kükenthal and T. Krumbach. Berlin and Leipzig: De Gruyter & Co. 1926

    Google Scholar 

  • Madin, L. P. and G. R. Harbison: Bathocyroe fosteri gen. nov., sp. nov.: a mesopelagic ctenophore observed and collected from a submersible. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 58, 559–564 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, N. B.: 7. Animal ecology. In: Deep oceans, pp 205–224. Ed. by P. J. Herring and M. R. Clarke. New York: Praeger 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, A. G.: Ctenophores of the Atlantic coast of North America. Washington: D. C.: Carnegie Inst. 1912

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, H.: Beobachtungen und Untersuchungen über die beroeartigen Akalephen. Mèm. Acad. imp. Sci. St.-Petersbourg. (6th ser.) 2, 479–543, pls. 1–13 (1833)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. L.: Sperm chemotaxis in the hydromedusae. I. Species-specificity and sperm behavior. Mar. Biol. 53, 99–114 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. L.: Identification of sibling species within the “Sarsia tubulosa complex” at Friday Harbor, Washington (Hydrozoa: Anthomedusae). J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 62, 153–172 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. L. and K. King: Sperm chemotaxis in Oikopleura dioica (Urochordata: Larvaceae). Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 183, 419–428 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, F.: Japanische Ctenophoren. Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte Ostasiens. Herausgegeben von Dr. F. Döflein. Abhandl. math.-phys. Klasse K. Bayer. Akad. Wiss., Vol. 4, Suppl. 1, 77 pp 1908

  • Pianka, H. D.: 4. Ctenophora. In: Reproduction of marine invertebrates, vol. 1, pp 201–265. Ed. by A. C. Giese and J. S. Pearse. New York and London: Academic Press 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Rang, P. C. A. L.: Etablissement de la famille des Beroides dans l'ordre des Acalèphes libres, et description de deux genres nouveaus qui lui appartiennent. Mèm. Soc. Hist. nat., Paris 4, 166–173 (1828)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, M. R. and M. A. Walter: Nutritional ecology of ctenophores — a review of recent research. In: Advances in marine biology, vol. 15, pp 178–199 New York: Academic Press 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynaud: La callianire bucephale. In: Centurie zoologique ou Choix d'Animaux rares, nouveaux ou imparfaitement connus, pp 84–85, pl. 28. Ed. by R. P. Lesson. Paris: F. G. Levrault 1830

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J. M. Shick, Orono

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harbison, G.R., Miller, R.L. Not all ctenophores are hermaphrodites. Studies on the systematics, distribution, sexuality and development of two species of Ocyropsis . Mar. Biol. 90, 413–424 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00428565

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00428565

Keywords

Navigation