Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 77–83 | Cite as

Development and functions of the shell sculpture of the marine snail Ceratostoma foliatum

  • T. M. Spight
  • A. Lyons
Article

Abstract

The shell of the adult Ceratostoma foliatum (Gmelin) is characterized by three varices with foliations, and a tooth on the anterior portion of the outer lip. These features are derived gradually from the markedly different sculpture of shells of small juveniles (a network of fine axial and spiral cords). The sculpture changes as the thin, cord-like basic varix is elaborated, reinforced, and modified by the development of a secondary structure (the tooth) and as the number of varices per whorl decreases. Most muricid shell patterns can be derived from juvenile patterns similar to that of C. foliatum by quantitative variations in these four processes. Likely functions of the complex and varied muricid shell structures include stabilization in shifting substrates, defense against predators, and strengthening of the shell. Different functions and shell-growth patterns are likely for the different types of varices. Shell structures are most elaborate on shells of adults. A structure's functions are likely to change as the structure becomes more complex on each successive whorl. The functional period in an individual's lifespan is consequently restricted by the pattern of growth, the rate of structural development, and the rate of shell erosion.

Keywords

Secondary Structure Quantitative Variation Shell Structure Structural Development Anterior Portion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Carter, R. M.: The shell ornament of Hysteroconcha and Hecuba (Bivalvia): a test case for inferential functional morphology. Veliger 10, 59–71 (1967).Google Scholar
  2. Clark, G. R.: Mollusk shell: daily growth lines. Science, N.Y. 161, 800–802 (1968).Google Scholar
  3. Connell, J. H.: A predator-prey system in the marine intertidal region. I. Balanus glandula and several predatory species of Thais. Ecol. Monogr. 40, 49–78 (1970).Google Scholar
  4. Cowell, E. B. and J. H. Crothers: On the occurrence of multiple rows of “teeth” in the shell of the dog-whelk Nucella lapillus. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 50, 1101–1111 (1970).Google Scholar
  5. Feare, C. J.: Aspects of the ecology of an exposed shore population of dogwhelks, Nucella lapillus (L.). Oecologia (Berl.) 5, 1–18 (1970)Google Scholar
  6. Hall, C. A., Jr.: The gastropod genus Ceratostoma. J. Paleont. 33, 121–126 (1959).Google Scholar
  7. Hewatt, W. G.: Ecological studies on selected marine intertidal communities of Monterey Bay. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University 1934.Google Scholar
  8. Inaba, A.: Growth of Chicoreus asianus. Venus, Kyoto 26, 5–7 (1967).Google Scholar
  9. Keen, A. M.: Sea shells of tropical west America, 2nd ed. 1064 pp. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press 1971.Google Scholar
  10. Kitching, J. A., L. Muntz and F. J. Ebling: The ecology of Lough Ine. XV. The ecological significance of shell and body forms in Nucella. J. Anim. Ecol. 35, 113–126 (1966).Google Scholar
  11. Laxton, J. H.: The relationship between the number of varices and total shell length in some New Zealand Cymatiidae (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia) and its ecological significance. Veliger 13, 127–134 (1970).Google Scholar
  12. Luckens, P. A.: Variation of shell characters of a species of Ocenebra (Mollusca: Gastropoda) at Asamushi. Sci. Rep. Tôhoku Univ. (Ser. IV, Biol.) 35, 149–159 (1970).Google Scholar
  13. MacGinitie, G. E. and N. MacGinitie: Natural history of marine animals, 473 pp. New York: McGraw-Hill 1949.Google Scholar
  14. MacKenzie, C. L., Jr.: Growth and reproduction of the oyster drill Eupleura caudata in the York River, Virginia. Ecology 42, 317–338 (1961).Google Scholar
  15. Neville, A. C.: Daily growth layers in animals and plants. Biol. Rev. 42, 421–441 (1967).Google Scholar
  16. Paine, R. T.: Function of labial spines, composition of diet, and size of certain marine gastropods. Veliger 9, 17–24 (1966).Google Scholar
  17. Spight, T. M., C. Birkeland and A. Lyons: Life histories of large and small murexes (Prosobranchia: Muricidae). Mar. Biol. (1974). (In press).Google Scholar
  18. Struhsaker, J. W.: Selection mechanisms associated with intraspecific shell variation in Littorina picta (Prosobranchia: Mesogastropoda). Evolution, Lancaster, Pa 22, 459–480 (1968).Google Scholar
  19. Wainwright, S. A.: Stress and design in bivalved mollusc shell. Nature, Lond. 224, 777–779 (1969).Google Scholar
  20. Wilbur, K. M. and G. Owen: Growth. In: Physiology of Mollusca, Vol. 1. pp 211–242 Ed. by K. M. Wilbur and C. M. Yonge. New York: Academic Press 1964.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. M. Spight
    • 1
  • A. Lyons
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations