Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 49–55 | Cite as

Survival of copepods passing through a nuclear power station on northeastern Long Island Sound, USA

  • E. J. Carpenter
  • B. B. Peck
  • S. J. Anderson
Article

Abstract

About 70% of the copepods entering the cooling water system of a nuclear power plant on northeastern Long Island Sound (USA) are not returned to the Sound in the effluent. Copepod mortalities are caused by the mechanical or hydraulic stresses of passage, although our experimental design could not determine whether heat or chlorination could cause mortality in the absence of mortality induced by hydraulic stress. After passing through the power plant, copepods sink rapidly (ca. 2.5 times faster than controls). This leads to an increase in concentrations of copepods suspended in the deep water (25 to 30 m) of the effluent pond. About half of the live copepods collected at the discharge and held in situ died within 3.5 days, and 70% died within 5 days, whereas only 10% of those from the intake died in 5 days. About 60% of the copepods observed suspended in deep water in the pond were dead. The copepod mortality caused by the power plant reflects the loss in secondary production occurring below about 270×103 m2 of sea surface in Long Island Sound annually. This loss represents a reduction of about 0.1% in the annual secondary production over a 333 km2 area of Long Island Sound adjacent to the power plant. Highest losses occurred during the spring (April, 1.4×106 g dry weight), the lowest in autumn (November, 45.8×103 g). If the same copepod loss rate exists for all power plants in Long Island Sound, then secondary production in 1.69×106 m2, or 0.05% of the total copepod production may be lost annually. A comparison of the surface outflow from Long Island to Block Island Sound with the water entrained through Millstone Unit One, and the 70% copepod loss rate in the latter area, indicates that Unit One eliminates about 0.1 to 0.3% of the copepod production in eastern Long Island Sound. This calculation compares favorably with losses computed from production data.

Keywords

Power Plant Deep Water Nuclear Power Plant Cooling Water Production Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Biological Methods Panel Committee on Oceanography: Recommended procedures for measuring the productivity of plankton standing stock and related oceanic properties, 59 pp. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, Washington 1969.Google Scholar
  2. Conover, R. H.: Oceanography of Long Island Sound 1952–1954. VI. Biology of Acartia clausi and A. tonsa. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 15, 156–233 (1956).Google Scholar
  3. Deevey, G. B.: Quantity and composition of the zooplankton of Block Island Sound. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 13, 120–164 (1952).Google Scholar
  4. —: Oceanography of Long Island Sound, 1952–1954. V. Zooplankton. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 15, 113–155 (1956).Google Scholar
  5. Dressel, D. W., D. R. Heinle and M. C. Grote: Vital staining to sort live and dead copepods. Chesapeake Sci. 13, 190–193 (1972).Google Scholar
  6. Heinle, D. R.: Temperature and zooplankton. Chesapeake Sci. 10, 186–209 (1969).Google Scholar
  7. Hillman, R. E., N. W. Davis and R. W. Cote: Summary report on a monitoring program on the ecology of the marine environment of the Millstone Point, Connecticut area, 131 pp. Duxbury, Mass: Battelle, W. F. Clapp Laboratories 1973.Google Scholar
  8. Mihursky, J. A.: Patuxent thermal studies. Prog. Rep. Md Dep. Wat. Res. 1 July 1966 to 31 December 1966. University of Maryland NRI Ref. 67-13, 1–28 (1967).Google Scholar
  9. Parsons, T. R., K. Stephens and J. D. H. Strickland: On the chemical composition of eleven species of marine phytoplankton. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 18, 1001–1016 (1961).Google Scholar
  10. Reeve, M. R. and E. Cosper: The acute thermal effects of heated effluents on the copepod Acartia tonsa from a subtropical bay and some problems of assessment. F. A. O. Technical Conference on marine pollution and its effects on living resources and fishing. pp 1–5 (1970).Google Scholar
  11. Riley, G. A.: Hydrography of the Long Island and Block Island Sounds. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 13, 5–39 (1952).Google Scholar
  12. Riley, G. A.: Review of the oceanography of Long Island Sound. Pap. mar. Biol. Oceanogr. 224–238 (1956).Google Scholar
  13. —: Pattern of production in marine ecosystems. In: Ecosystem structure and function, pp 91–112. Ed. by J. A. Wiens. Oregon: State University Press 1972.Google Scholar
  14. Sokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf: Biometry, 776 pp. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Co. 1969.Google Scholar
  15. Strickland, J. D. H. and T. R. Parsons: A manual of seawater analysis. Bull. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 167, 1–311 (1968).Google Scholar
  16. Suchanek, T. H., Jr. and C. Grossman: Viability of zooplankton. In: Studies on the effects of a steam-electric generating plant in the marine environment at Northport, pp 61–74. Ed. by G. C. Williams, J. B. Mitton, T. H. Schanek, Jr., N. Gebelein, C. Grossman, J. Pearce, J. Young, C. E. Taylor, R. Mulstay, C. D. Hardy. New York: Marine Science Research Center, State University of New York 1971. (Tech. Rep. No. 9).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. J. Carpenter
    • 1
  • B. B. Peck
    • 1
  • S. J. Anderson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyWoods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWoods HoleUSA

Personalised recommendations