Marine Biology

, Volume 64, Issue 3, pp 341–349 | Cite as

Circadian rhythm of swimming activity in juvenile pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha)

  • J. G. Godin


The circadian rhythm of swimming activity and the role of the daily illumination cycle in the synchronization of this rhythm were studied in individual juvenile pink salmon. Sixty eight percent of all fish examined (n=38) were day-active when exposed to a 12 h L:12 h D cycle; the remaining fish were nocturnally active. One half of the fish tested under laboratory conditions of continuous, constant light intensity (LL) and constant temperature showed unambiguously endogenous activity rhythms with circadian periods for up to 10 d. The remaining fish were arrhythmic. Mean period length of the free-running activity rhythms for diurnal fish in LL shortened with constant light intensity increasing from 6 to 600 lx, as predicted by the circadian rule. In contrast, mean free-running period for nocturnal fish did not vary significantly with similarly increasing constant light intensity. Mean swimming speed (activity level) of both diurnal and nocturnal fish increased significantly with increasing light intensity. This is suggestive of a positive photokinetic response. When subjected to a phase-delayed LD cycle, the fish resynchronized their daily rhythms of activity with this new LD cycle after only one transient cycle in most instances. Hence, the timing of the daily activity rhythms appeared to occur through the direct masking action of the illumination cycle on activity, rather than through entrainment of an endogenous circadian system.


Circadian Rhythm Swimming Speed Activity Rhythm Swimming Activity Daily Rhythm 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Aschoff, J.: Exogenous and endogenous components in circadian rhythms. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 25, 11–28 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aschoff, J.: Circadian rhythms: influences of internal and external factors on the period measured in constant conditions. Z. Tierpsychol. 49, 225–249 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aschoff, J., K. Hoffmann, H. Pohl and R. Wever: Re-entrainment of circadian rhythms after phase shifts of the Zeitgeber. Chronobiologia 2, 23–78 (1975)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bohun, S. and H. E. Wing: Locomotor activity of the American eel (Anguilla rostrata). Chesapeake Sci. 7, 137–147 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bünning, E.: The physiological clock. Revised Third Edition, 258 pp. New York: Springer-Verlag 1973Google Scholar
  6. Byrne, J. E.: The effects of photoperiod and temperature on the daily pattern of locomotor activity in juvenile sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka (Walbaum), 125 pp. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver 1968Google Scholar
  7. Casimir, M. J.: Zur Morphologie, Histochemie, Tagesperiodik und Biologie der Operculardrüse bei Labriden und Scariden (Pisces). Mar. Biol. 8, 126–146 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curio, E.: The ethology of predation, 250 pp. Zoophysiology and ecology. Vol. 7, New York: Springer-Verlag 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, R. E. and J. Bardach: Time co-ordinated prefeeding activity in fish. Anim. Behav. 13, 154–162 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dill, P. A.: On the development of diel activity rhythms in Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout, 89 pp. Ph.D. thesis, University of Western Ontario, London 1970Google Scholar
  11. Dörrscheidt, G. J. and L. Beck: Advanced methods for evaluating characteristic parameters (τ, α, ρ) of circadian rhythms. J. Math. Biol. 2, 107–121 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Enright, J. T.: Ecological aspects of endogenous rhythmicity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1, 221–238 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eriksson, L.-O.: Die Jahresperiodik augen- und pinealorganloser Bachsaiblinge Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill. Aquilo, Ser. Zool. 13, 8–12 (1972)Google Scholar
  14. Eriksson, L.-O.: Spring inversion of the diel rhythm of locomotor activity in young sea-going brown trout, Salmo trutta trutta L. and Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. Aquilo, Ser. Zool. 14, 68–79 (1973)Google Scholar
  15. Eriksson, L.-O.: Diel and annual locomotor activity rhythms in some fresh water fish species with special reference to the seasonal inversion in salmonids. Doctoral thesis, University of Umeå, Umeå 1975Google Scholar
  16. Eriksson, L.-O.: Nocturnalism versus diurnalism-dualism within fish individuals. In: Rhythmic activity of fishes, pp 69–89. Ed. by J. E. Thorpe. New York: Academic Press 1978Google Scholar
  17. Favorite, F., A. J. Dodimead and L. Nasu: Oceanography of the subarctic Pacific region, 1960–71. Intl. North Pac. Fish. Comm. Bull. 33, 1–187 (1976)Google Scholar
  18. Godin, J.-G. J.: Diel rhythms of behavior in juvenile pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Walbaum), 288 pp. Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver 1979Google Scholar
  19. Godin, J.-G. J., C. Groot and M. C. Armstrong: Description and evaluation of a photoelectric system for monitoring the locomotor activity of a pelagic fish. Can. J. Zool. 56, 1412–1419 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gwinner, E.: Circadian and circannual rhythms in birds. In: Avian biology. Vol. 5, pp 221–285. Ed. by D. S. Farner and J. R. King. New York: Academic Press 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Katz, H. M.: Circadian rhythms in juvenile American shad, Alosa sapidissima. J. Fish Biol. 12, 609–614 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kavaliers, M.: The role of photoperiod and twilight in the control of locomotory rhythms in the lake chub, Couesius plumbeus, 200 pp. Ph.D. thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton 1978aGoogle Scholar
  23. Kavaliers, M.: Seasonal changes in the circadian period of the lake chub Couesius plumbeus. Can. J. Zool. 56, 2591–2596 (1978b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kavaliers, M.: Social groupings and circadian activity of the killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 158, 69–76 (1980a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kavaliers, M.: Circadian locomotor activity rhythms of the burbot, Lota lota: seasonal differences in period length and the effect of pinealectomy. J. comp. Physiol. 136, 215–218 (1980b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kavaliers, M.: Circadian activity of the white sucker, Catostomus commersoni: comparison of individual and shoaling fish. Can. J. Zool. 58, 1399–1403 (1980c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. LeBrasseur, R. J. and R. R. Parker: Growth rate of Central British Columbia pink salmon. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 21, 1101–1127 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Menaker, M.: Overview: a “terrestrial” biologist looks at bio-rhythms in the marine environment. In: Biological rhythms in the marine environment, pp 273–278. Ed. by P. J. DeCoursey. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press 1976Google Scholar
  29. Müller, K.: Die Tages- und Jahresperiodik der Bachforelle (Salmo trutta L.) am Polarkreis. Aquilo, Ser. Zool. 8, 50–62 (1969)Google Scholar
  30. Müller, K.: The flexibility of the circadian system of fish at different latitudes. In: Rhythmic activity of fishes, pp 91–104. Ed. by J. E. Thorpe. New York: Academic Press 1978aGoogle Scholar
  31. Müller, K.: Locomotor activity of whitefish—shoals (Coregonus lavaretus). In: Rhythmic activity of fishes, pp 225–233. Ed. by J. E. Thorpe. New York: Academic Press 1978bGoogle Scholar
  32. Neave, F.: Ocean migration of Pacific salmon. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 21, 1227–1244 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nelson, D. R. and R. H. Johnson: Diel activity rhythms in the nocturnal, bottom dwelling sharks Heterodontus francisci and Cephaloscyllium ventriosum. Copeia 1970 (4), 732–739 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Phillips, A. C. and W. E. Barraclough: Early marine growth of juvenile Pacific salmon in the Strait of Georgia and Saanich Inlet, British Columbia. Can. Fish. Mar. Serv. Tech. Rep. No. 830, 1–19 (1978)Google Scholar
  35. Richardson, N. E. and J. D. McCleave: Locomotory activity rhythms of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in various light conditions. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 147, 422–432 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Royce, W. F., L. S. Smith and A. C. Hartt: Models of oceanic migrations of Pacific salmon and comments on guidance mechanisms. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Fish. Bull. 66, 441–462 (1968)Google Scholar
  37. Schwassmann, H. O.: Circadian activity patterns in gymnotid fish. In: Biochronometry, pp 186–199. Ed. by M. Menaker. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences 1971Google Scholar
  38. Siegmund, R. and D. L. Wolff: Circadian-Rhythmik und Gruppenverhalten bei Leucaspius delineatus (Pisces, Cyprinidae). Experientia 29, 54–58 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Varanelli, C. C. and J. D. McCleave: Locomotor activity of Atlantic salmon parr (Salmo salar L.) in various light conditions and in weak magnetic fields. Anim. Behav. 22, 178–186 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. G. Godin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations