Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 64, Issue 3, pp 273–283 | Cite as

Zooplankton of the Bristol Channel and Severn Estuary. The distribution of four copepods in relation to salinity

  • N. R. Collins
  • R. Williams
Article

Abstract

The seasonal variations in distribution and abundance of the common zooplankton species in the Bristol Channel and Severn Estuary were related to the salinity regimes observed over the period November 1973 to February 1975. The dominant constituents in all regions were the calanoid copepods, which reached maximum densities in July: approximately 100 times their winter levels. Four zooplankton assemblages were recognised using an objective classification program which computed similarity coefficients and used group-average sorting. The assemblages existed along the salinity gradient observed from the Severn Estuary to the Celtic Sea. The assemblages were classified as true estuarine, estuarine and marine, euryhaline marine and stenohaline marine and were characterized by the copepods Eurytemora affinis (Poppe) (<30‰S), Acartia bifilosa var. inermis (rose) (27 to 33.5‰S), Centropages hamatus (Lilljeborg) (31 to 35‰S) and Calanus helgolandicus (Claus) (>33‰S), respectively.

Keywords

Salinity Gradient Zooplankton Species Calanoid Copepod Salinity Regime Zooplankton Assemblage 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Abdullah, M. I., H. M. Dunlop and D. Gardner: Chemical and hydrographic observations in the Bristol Channel during April and June 1971. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 53, 299–319 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beverton, R. J. H. and D. S. Tungate: A multi-purpose plankton sampler. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer. 31, 153–157 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bray, J. R. and J. T. Curtis: An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27, 325–349 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cronin, L. E., J. C. Daiber and E. M. Hulbert: Quantitative seasonal aspects of zooplankton in the Delaware River estuary. Cheseapeake Sci. 3, 63–93 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Day, J. H.: The ecology of South African estuaries, part 1. A review of estuarine conditions in general. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 33, 53–91 (1951)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deevey, G. B.: The zooplankton of Tisbury Great Pond. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 12, 1–44 (1948)Google Scholar
  7. Deevey, G. B.: The zooplankton of the surface waters of the Delaware Bay region. Bull. Bingham oceanogr. Coll. 17, 5–53 (1960)Google Scholar
  8. Edinburgh Oceanographic Laboratory: Continuous plankton records: a plankton atlas of the North Atlantic and North Sea. Bull. mar. Ecol. 7, 1–174 (1973)Google Scholar
  9. Field, J. G.: A numerical analysis of changes in the soft bottom fauna along a transect across False Bay, South Africa. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 7, 215–253 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glover, R. S.: The Continuous Plankton Recorder survey of the North Atlantic. Symp. zool. Soc. Lond. 19, 189–210 (1967)Google Scholar
  11. Gurney, R.: British fresh-water Copepoda, Vol. 1. 238 pp. London: Royal Society 1931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harding, D. and G. P. Arnold: Flume experiments on the hydrodynamics of the Lowestoft high-speed plankton samplers: I. J. Cons. int. Explor. Mer. 34, 24–36 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heinle, D. R. and D. A. Flemer: Carbon requirements of a population of the estuarine copepod Eurytemora affinis. Mar. Biol. 31, 235–247 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeffries, H. P.: Salinity-space distribution of the estuarine copepod genus Eurytemora. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 47, 291–300 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeffries, H. P.: Saturation of estuarine zooplankton by congeneric associates. In: Estuaries, pp 500–508. Ed. by G. H. Lauff. Washington, D. C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science 1967. (Publs Am. Ass. Advmt Sci. No. 83)Google Scholar
  16. Knatz, G.: Succession of copepod species in a middle Atlantic estuary. Estuaries (Solomons, Md) 1, 68–71 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lance, G. N. and W. T. Williams: A general theory of classificatory sorting strategies. I. Hierarchical systems. Comput. J. 9, 373–380 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lance, J.: The salinity of some estuarine planktonic copepods. Limnol. Oceanogr. 8, 440–449 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pauw, N., de: On the distribution of Eurytemora affinis (Poppe) (Copepoda) in the Western Scheldt estuary. Verh. int. Verein. theor. angew. Limnol. 18, 1462–1472 (1973)Google Scholar
  20. Percival, E.: A report on the estuaries of the river Tamar and the river Lynher. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 16, 81–108 (1929)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Radford, P. J.: Some aspects of an estuarine ecosystem model-GEMBASE. In: State-of-the-art in ecological modelling, pp 301–322. Ed. by S. E. Jørgensen, Copenhagen: International Society for Ecological Modelling 1979a. (Proceedings of ISEM Conference of Ecological Modelling, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Radford, P. J.: The role of a general ecosystem model of the Bristol Channel and Severn Estuary (GEMBASE). In: Tidal power and estuary management, pp 40–46. Ed. by R. T. Severn, D. Dineley and L. E. Hawker. Bristol: Scientechnica 1979b. (30th Symposium of Colston Research Society, University of Bristol, 1978)Google Scholar
  23. Radford, P. J. and I. R. Joint: The application of an ecosystem model to the Bristol Channel and Severn Estuary. Wat. Pollut. Control 79, 244–254 (1980). (Institute of Water Pollution Control Annual Conference; Conference Paper No. 7.)Google Scholar
  24. Rees, C. B.: The plankton of the upper reaches of the Bristol Channel. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 23, 397–425 (1939)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Southward, A. J.: The distribution of some planktonic animals in the English Channel and approaches. II. Surveys with the Gulf III high-speed sampler 1958–60. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 42, 275–375 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Spooner, G. M. and H. B. Moore: The ecology of the Tamar estuary. VI. An account of the microfauna of the intertidal muds. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 24, 283–330 (1940)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Uncles, R. J. and P. J. Radford: Seasonal and spring-neap tidal dependence of axial dispersion coefficients in the Severn — a wide, vertically mixed estuary. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 703–726 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vaupel-Klein, J. C. von and R. W. Weber: Distribution of Eurytemora affinis (Copepoda: Calanoida) in relation to salinity: field and laboratory observations. Neth. J. Sea Res. 9, 297–310 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilson, M. S.: The Calanoida. In: Ward and Whipple's freshwater biology, 2nd ed. pp 738–794, 858–859. Ed. by W. T. Edmondson. New York: John Wiley & Sons 1959Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. R. Collins
    • 1
  • R. Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Marine Environmental ResearchNatural Environment Research CouncilPlymouthEngland

Personalised recommendations