Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 64, Issue 3, pp 259–265 | Cite as

Intertidal hyperbenthic populations in the Nanaimo estuary

  • J. R. Sibert
Article

Abstract

Samples were pumped from within 5 and 30 cm of the sediment surface in a tidal channel of the Nanaimo estuary and filtered through 100-μm mesh plankton nets. Despite homogeneity of the water at these levels, as indicated by salinity and oxygen, there were large persistent differences in population density of small crustaceans. The density at the 5 cm level always exceeds the density at the 30 cm level by a factor of 2 to 20. These results are discussed in relation to Beyer's concept of hyperbenthic plankton populations which is extended to include intertidal areas. It is concluded that hyperbenthic populations are real phenomena and are of considerable importance in trophodynamics. A model for formation and maintenance of hyperbenthic populations is proposed.

Keywords

Oxygen Population Density Sediment Surface Considerable Importance Tidal Channel 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bell, S. S. and K. M. Sherman: A field investigation of meiofaunal dispersal: tidal resuspension and implications. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 3, 245–249 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beyer, F.: A new, bottom-living trachymedusa from the Oslo fjord. Nytt Mag. Zool. 6, 121–143 (1958)Google Scholar
  3. Bossanyi, J.: A preliminary survey of the small natant fauna in the vicinity of the sea floor off Blyth, Northumberland. J. Anim. Ecol. 26, 353–368 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boysen, H. O.: Seasonal variations in abundance of hyperbenthic animals in the Kiel Bight. Merentutkimuslait. Julk. 239, 206–212 (1975)Google Scholar
  5. Caldwell, D. R. and T. M. Chriss: The viscous sublayer at the sea floor. Science, N. Y. 205, 1131–1132 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Healey, M. C.: Detritus and juvenile salmon production in the Nanaimo estuary: I. Production and feeding rates of juvenile chum salmon (Onchorhynchus keta). J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 26, 488–496 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hesthagen, I.: Diurnal and seasonal variations in the near-bottom fauna — the hyperbenthos — in one of the deeper channels of the Kieler Bucht (western Baltic). Kieler Meeresforsch. 29, 116–140 (1973)Google Scholar
  8. Komar, P. D.: Boundary layer flow under steady unidirectional currents. In: Marine sediment transport and environmental management, pp 91–106. Ed. by D. J. Stanley and D. J. P. Swift. New York: John Wiley and Sons 1976Google Scholar
  9. Middleton, G. W. and J. B. Southard: Mechanics of sediment movement, pp 1.1–10.2 Binghamton, N. Y.: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists 1978Google Scholar
  10. Odum, W. E., J. S. Fisher and J. C. Pickral: Factors controlling the flux of particulate organic carbon from estuarine werlands. In: Ecological processes in coastal and marine systems, pp 69–80. Ed. by R. J. Livingston. New York: Plenum Press 1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sherman, K. S. and B. C. Coull: The response of meiofauna to sediment disturbance. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 46, 59–71 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sibert, J., B. A. Kask and T. J. Brown: A diver-operated sled for sampling the epibenthos, 19 pp. Fish. Mar. Serv Tech. Rep. No. 738, 1977Google Scholar
  13. Sibert, J. and B. Kask: Do fish have diets? In: Proceedings of the 1977 northeast Pacific chinook and coho salmon workshop, pp 48–57. Ed. by B. G. Shepherd and R. M. J. Ginetz. Fish. Mar. Serv. Tech. Rep. No. 759, 1978Google Scholar
  14. Sibert, J. and S. Obrebski: Frequency distributions of food item counts individual fish stomachs. In: Fish food habits studies, First Pacific Northwest Technical Workshop, pp 107–114. Ed. by C. A. Simenstad and S. J. Lipovsky. Seattle Washington Sea Grant 1976Google Scholar
  15. Siegel, S.: Nonparametric statistics, 312 pp. New York: McGraw-Hill 1956Google Scholar
  16. Simenstad, C. A. and W. J. Kinney: Selection of epipenthic plankton by outmigrating chum salmon in Hood Canal, Washington. In: Proc. 1978 Pink and Chum Salmon Workshop, pp 243–289. Ed. by J. C. Mason. Pac. Biol. Sta., Nanaimo, B. C., Canada 1979Google Scholar
  17. Smayda, T.: The suspension and sinking of phytoplankton in the sea. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 8, 353–414 (1970)Google Scholar
  18. Strickland, J. D. H. and T. R. Parsons: A practical handbook of seawater analysis, 311 pp. Fish. Res. Bd Can. Bull. 167, 1968Google Scholar
  19. Woodwell, G. M., D. E. Whitney, C. A. S. Hall and R. A. Houghton: The Flax Pond ecosystem study: exchanges of carbon in water between a salt marsh and Long Island Sound. Limnol. Oceanogr. 22, 833–838 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. R. Sibert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Fisheries and OceansResource Services Branch, Pacific Biological StationNanaimoCanada

Personalised recommendations