Abstract
When the predatory sea star Pycnopodia helianthoides was placed upstream, the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus responded defensively by extending and opening its globiferous pedicellariae. No pedicellaria response was given in control seawater or when the sea star was downstream. The snail Tegula funebralis responded by moving up vertical surfaces when Pycnopodia helianthoides or when Pisaster ochraceus were placed upstream. When these sea stars were introduced downstream, the snail's response was not significantly different from that in control seawater. Water collected from an aquarium containing a single sea star was sufficient to trigger the response of S. purpuratus and T. funebralis; the physical presence of the sea star was not essential. This indicated that a chemical stimulus was involved, and the lack of responses when sea stars were downstream argued strongly against the possible additional involvement of visual or vibrational stimuli. S. purpuratus gave stronger pedicellaria responses to water flowing over an active Pycnopodia helianthoides than to water flowing over the same sea star when it was inactive. The significance of the ability to distinguish between actively foraging and inactive predators is discussed, and a mechanism is proposed to explain differences in the amount of stimulatory chemicals released by active and inactive sea stars.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Binyon, J.: The permeability of the asteroid podial wall to water and potassium ions. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 56, 639–647 (1976)
Bullock, T.H.: Predator recognition and escage responses of some intertidal gastropods in presence of starfish. Behaviour 5, 130–140 (1953)
Dayton, P.K.: Two cases of resource partitioning in an intertidal community: making the right prediction for the wrong reason. Am. Nat. 107, 662–670 (1973)
—: Experimental evaluation of ecological dominance in a rocky intertidal algal community. Ecol. Monogr., 45, 137–159 (1975)
—, R.J. Rosenthal, L.C. Mahen and T. Antezana: Population structure and foraging biology of the predaceous chilean asteroid Meyenaster gelatinosus and the escape biology of its prey. Mar. Biol. 39, 361–370 (1977)
Doering, P.H.: A burrowing response of Mercenaria mercenaria (Linnaeus, 1758) elicited by Asterias forbesi (Desor, 1848). Veliger 19, 167–175 (1976)
Edwards, D.C.: Reproduction in Olivella biplicata. Veliger 10, 297–304 (1968)
Feder, H.M.: Gastropod defensive responses and their effectiveness in reducing predation by starfishes. Ecology 44, 505–512 (1963)
—: Organisms responsive to predatory sea stars. Sarsia 29, 371–394 (1967)
—: Escape responses in marine invertebrates. Scient. Am. 227, 92–100 (1972)
— and A. Christensen: Aspects of asteroid biology. In: Physiology of Echinodermata, pp 87–127. Ed. by R. Boolootian. New York: John Wiley & Sons 1966
— and R. Lasker: Partial purification of a substance from starfish tube feet which elicits escape responses in gastropod molluscs. Life Sciences 3, 1047–1051 (1964)
Jensen, M.: The response of two sea-urchins to the sea-star Marthasterias glacialis (L.) and other stimuli. Ophelia 3, 209–219 (1966)
Mackie, A.M.: Avoidance reactions of marine invertebrates to either steroid glycosides of starfish or synthetic surface-active agents. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 5, 63–69 (1970)
— R. Lasker and P.T. Grant: Avoidance reactions of a mollusc Buccinum undatum to saponin-like surface-active substances in extracts of the starfish Asterias rubens and Marthasterias glacialis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 26, 415–428 (1968)
Margolin, A.S.: The mantle response of Diodora aspera. Anim. Behav. 12, 187–194 (1964)
Mauzey, K.P., C. Birkeland and P.K. Dayton: Feeding behavior of asteroids and escage responses of their prey in the Puget Sound region. Ecology 49, 603–619 (1968)
Menge, J.L. and B.A. Menge: Role of resource allocation, aggression and spatial heterogeneity in coexistence of two competing intertidal starfish. Ecol. Monogr. 44, 189–209 (1974)
Montgomery, D.H.: Responses of two haliotid gastropods (Mollusca), Haliotis assimilis and Haliotis rufescens, to the forcipulate asteroids (Echinodermata), Pycnopodia helianthoides and Pisaster ocharaceus. Veliger 9, 359–368 (1967)
Paine, R.T.: The Pisaster-Tegula interaction: prey patches, predator food preference, and intertidal community structure. Ecology 50, 950–961 (1969)
Phillips, D.W.: Distance chemoreception-triggered avoidance behavior of the limpets Acmaea (Collisella) limatula and Acmaea (Notoacmea) scutum to the predatory starfish Pisaster ochraceus. J. exp. Zool. 191, 199–210 (1975)
— The effect of a species-specific avoidance response to predatory starfish on the intertidal distribution of two gastropods. Oecologia (Berl.) 23, 83–94 (1976)
— Avoidance and escape responses of the gastropod mollusc Olivella biplicata (Sowerby) to predatory asteroids. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 28, 77–86 (1977)
Rosenthal, R.J. and J.R. Chess: A predator-prey relationship between the leather star, Dermasterias imbricata, and the purple urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Fish. Bull. U.S. 70, 205–216 (1972)
Szal, R.A.: Distance chemoreception in a marine snail, Tegula funebralis, 202 pp. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University 1970
— “New” sense organ of primitive gastropods. Nature, Lond. 229, 490–492 (1971)
Wobber, D.R.: Agonism in asteroids. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 148, 483–496 (1975)
Yarnall, J.L.: The responses of Tegula funebralis to starfishes and predatory snails. Veliger 6 (Suppl.), 56–58 (1964)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by N.D. Holland, La Jolla
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Phillips, D.W. Chemical mediation of invertebrate defensive behaviors and the ability to distinguish between foraging and inactive predators. Marine Biology 49, 237–243 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391136
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391136