Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 313–318 | Cite as

Growth and competition of the marine diatoms Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Thalassiosira pseudonana. II. Light limitation

  • D. M. Nelson
  • C. F. D'Elia
  • R. R. L. Guillard
Article

Abstract

The marine diatoms Phaeodactylum tricornutum (Bohlin) and Thalassiosira pseudonana (Hasle and Heimdal) were grown under both continous illumination and a 14 h light: 10 h dark cycle at light intensities ranging from 1.53×10-4 to 2.95×10-1 ly min-1. Under both photoperiods, T. pseudonana exhibited higher division rates than P. tricornutum at high light intensities, but the reverse was true at all light intensities <3×10-3 ly min-1. Comparison of these results with available data on light-limited growth of other planktonic algae suggests that P. tricornutum may be unusually efficient at maintaining its cell division rate at low light intensity. This efficiency may contribute substantially to its success in turbid, nutrient-enriched mass algal culture systems, the only environments in which it is known to attain great numbers.

Keywords

Light Intensity Cell Division Culture System Dark Cycle High Light Intensity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Ansell, A.D., J.E.G. Raymont, K.F. Lander, E. Crowley and P. Shackley: Studies on the mass culture of Phaeodactylum. II. The growth of Phaeodactylum and other species in outdoor tanks. Limnol. Oceanogr. 8, 184–206 (1963)Google Scholar
  2. Beardall, J. and I. Morris: The concept of light intensity adaptation in marine phytoplankton: some experiments with Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Mar. Biol. 37, 377–387 (1976)Google Scholar
  3. Davis, C.O.: Continous culture of marine diatoms under silicate limitation. II. Effect of light intensity on growth and nutrient uptake of Skeletonema costatum. J. Phycol. 12, 291–300 (1976)Google Scholar
  4. D'Elia, C.F., R.R.L. Guillard and D.M. Nelson: Growth and competition of the marine diatoms Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Thalassiosira pseudonana. I. Nutrient effects. Mar. Biol. 50, 305–312 (1979)Google Scholar
  5. —, J.H. Ryther and T.M. Losordo: Productivity and nitrogen balance in large scale phytoplankton cultures. Wat. Res. 11, 1031–1040 (1977)Google Scholar
  6. Epifanio, C.E., C.M. Logan and C. Turk: The culture of six species of bivalves in a recirculating seawater system. Proc. 10th Eur. mar. Biol. Symp. 1, 97–108 (1976). (Ed. by G. Persoone and E. Jaspers. Wetteren, Belgium: Universa Press)Google Scholar
  7. Eppley, R.W. and J.L. Coatsworth: Culture of the marine phytoplankter, Dunaliella tertiolecta, with light-dark cycles. Arch. Mikrobiol. 55, 66–80 (1966)Google Scholar
  8. Ferguson, R.I., A. Collier and D.A. Meeter: Growth response of Thalassiosira pseudonana Hasle and Heimdal clone 3H to illumination, temperature and nitrogen source. Chesapeake Sci. 17, 148–158 (1976)Google Scholar
  9. Goldman, J.C. and J.H. Ryther: Temperature-influenced species competition in mass cultures of marine phytoplankton. Biotechnol. Bioengng 18, 1125–1144 (1976)Google Scholar
  10. —— and L.D. Williams: Mass culture of marine algae in outdoor cultures. Nature, Lond. 254, 594–595 (1975)Google Scholar
  11. Guillard, R.R.L.: Division rates. In: Handbook of phycological methods-culture methods and growth measurements. pp289–311. Ed. by J. Stein. Cambridge: University Press 1973Google Scholar
  12. — and P. Kilham: The ecology of marine planktonic diatoms. In: The biology of diatoms, pp 327–469. Ed. by D. Werner. London: Blackwell 1977Google Scholar
  13. — and J.H. Ryther: Studies of marine planktonic diatoms. I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt and Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Gran. Can. J. Microbiol. 8, 229–239 (1962)Google Scholar
  14. Halldal, P. and C.S. French: Algal growth in crossed gradients of light intensity and temperature. Pl. Physiol., Lancaster 33, 249–252 (1958)Google Scholar
  15. Holt, M.G. and T.J. Smayda: The effect of daylength and light intensity on the grwoth rate of the marine diatom Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Gran. J. Phycol. 10, 231–237 (1974)Google Scholar
  16. Jitts, H.R., C.D. McAllister, K. Stephens and J.D.H. Strickland: The cell division rates of some marine phytoplankters as a function of light and temperature. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 21, 139–157 (1964)Google Scholar
  17. Mann, R. and J.H. Ryther: Growth of six species of bivalve molluscs in a waste recycling-aquaculture system. Aquaculture 11, 231–245 (1977)Google Scholar
  18. Paasche, E.: Marine plankton algae grown with light/dark cycles. I. Coccolithus huxleyi. Physiologia Pl. 20, 946–956 (1967)Google Scholar
  19. —: Marine plankton algae grown with light/dark cycles. II. Ditylum brightwellii and Nitzschia turgidula. Physiologia Pl. 21, 66–77 (1968)Google Scholar
  20. Smayda, T.J.: Experimental observations on the influence of temperature, light and salinity on cell division of the marine diatom Detonula fervacea (Cleve) Gran. J. Phycol. 5, 150–157 (1969)Google Scholar
  21. Strickland, J.D.H.: Solar radiation penetrating the ocean. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 15, 453–493 (1957)Google Scholar
  22. Styron, C.E., T.M. Hagan, D.R. Campbell, J. Harvin, N.K. Whittenburg, G.A. Baughman, M.E. Bransford, W.H. Saunders, D.C. Williams, C. Woodle, N.K. Dixon and C.R. McNeill: Effects of temperature and salinity on growth and uptake of 65Zn and 137Cs for six marine algae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 56, 13–20 (1976)Google Scholar
  23. Tamiya, H.: Mass culture of algae. A. Rev. Pl. Physiol. 8, 309–334 (1957)Google Scholar
  24. Thomas, W.H.: Effects of temperature and illumination on cell division rates of three species of tropical oceanic phytoplankton. J. Phycol. 2, 17–22 (1966)Google Scholar
  25. Walne, P.R.: Studies of the food value of nineteen genera of algae to juvenile bivalves of the genera Ostrea, Crassostrea, Mercenaria and Mytilus. Fishery Invest., Lond. (Ser. 2) 26 (5), 1–62 (1970)Google Scholar
  26. White, A.W.: Growth of two facultatively heterotrophic marine centric diatoms. J. Phycol. 10, 292–300 (1974)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. M. Nelson
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. F. D'Elia
    • 1
  • R. R. L. Guillard
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyWoods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWoods HoleUSA
  2. 2.School of OceanographyOregon State UniversityOregonCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations