Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 25–29 | Cite as

Meiofaunal thiobios and “the Arenicola negation”: Case not proven

  • P. J. S. Boaden
Article

Abstract

It has been alleged recently that the distribution of meiofauna around Arenicola burrows disproves the existence of a specifically anaerobic marine meiofauna. Critical appraisal of the evidence on which this denial was based shows that the conclusion was untenable. It may have arisen mistakenly from inadequate sampling of the burrow micro habitats, from lack of complementary data on burrow wall oxygen regime and from prejudgement (by denying the possibility of primary anaerobiosis) of the reasons why species held to be anaerobic by other authors occur in proximity to oxic conditions. These points and some new data on Arenicola burrow oxygenation are discussed. It is shown that at present the evidence from meiofaunal distribution around Arenicola burrows may be taken as much in favour of thiobiotic theories as against them.

Keywords

Oxygen Critical Appraisal Meiofauna Oxic Condition Inadequate Sampling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Aller, R. C. and J. Y. Yingst: Biogeochemistry of tube-dwelling: a study of the sedentary polychaete Amphitrite ornata (Leidy). J. mar. Res. 36, 201–254 (1978)Google Scholar
  2. Barcroft, J. and H. Barcroft: The blood pigment of Arenicola. Proc. R. Soc. (B) 96, 28–42 (1924)Google Scholar
  3. Boaden, P. J. S.: Anaerobiosis, meiofauna and early metazoan evolution. Zoologica Scr. 4, 21–24 (1975)Google Scholar
  4. Boaden, P. J. S.: Thiobiotic facts and fancies (Aspects of the distribution and evolution of anaerobic meiofauna). Mikrofauna Meeresbod. 61, 45–63 (1977)Google Scholar
  5. Boaden, P. J. S. and H. M.Platt: Daily migration pattern in an intertidal meiobenthic community. Thalassia jugosl. 7, 1–12 (1971)Google Scholar
  6. Borden, M. A.: A study of the respiration and of the function of haemoglobin in Planorbis corneus and Arenicola marina. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 17, 709–738 (1931)Google Scholar
  7. Broekhuysen, G. J.: The extremes in percentages of dissolved oxygen to which the fauna of a Zostera field in the tidal zone at Nieuwdiep can be exposed. Archs. neerl. Zool. 1, 339–346 (1935)Google Scholar
  8. Crezée, M.: Solenofilomorphidae (Acoela), major component of a new turbellarian association in the sulfide system. Int. Revue gas. Hydrobiol. 61, 105–129 (1976)Google Scholar
  9. Eliassen, E.: The oxygen supply during ebb of Arenicola marina in the Danish Waddensea. Univ. Bergen Arb. 12, 3–9 (1955)Google Scholar
  10. Elmgren, R.: Benthic meiofauna as indicator of oxygen conditions in the northern Baltic proper. Merentutkimuslait. Jutk. (Havsforsk-Inst. Skr., Helsingf.) 239, 265–271 (1975)Google Scholar
  11. Fenchel, T. M.: The ecology of marine microbenthos IV. Ophelia 6, 1–182 (1969)Google Scholar
  12. Fenchel, T. M. and R. J. Riedl: The sulfide system: a new biotic community underneath the oxidized layer of marine sand bottoms. Mar. Biol. 7, 225–268 (1970)Google Scholar
  13. Hecht, F.: Der chemische Einfluss organischer Zersetzungsstoffe auf das Benthos, dargelegt an Untersuchungen mit marinen Polychaeten, insbesondere Arenicola marina L. Senckenbergiana 14, 199–220 (1932)Google Scholar
  14. Jones, J. D.: Observations on the respiratory physiology and on the haemoglobin of the polychaete genus Nephthys, with special reference to N. hombergii (Aud. et M. Edw.). J. exp. Biol. 32, 110–125 (1955)Google Scholar
  15. Maguire, C.: Meiofaunal community structure and vertical distribution: a comparison of some Co. Down beaches. In: Biology of Benthic Organisms, pp 425–431. Ed. by B. F. Keegan, P. O. Ceidigh and P. J. S. Boaden. Oxford: Pergammon 1977Google Scholar
  16. Maguire, C. and P. J. S. Boaden: Energy and Evolution in the thiobios. An extrapolation from the marine gastrotrich Thiodasys sterreri. Cah. Biol. mar. 16, 635–646 (1975)Google Scholar
  17. Ott, J. and F. Schiemer. Respiration and anaerobiosis of free living nematodes from marine and limnic sediments. Neth. J. Sea Res. 7, 233–243 (1973)Google Scholar
  18. Patel, S. and C. P. Spencer: The oxidation of sulphide by the haem compounds from the blood of Arenicola marina. J. mar biol. Ass. U.K. 43, 167–175 (1963)Google Scholar
  19. Reise, K. and P. Ax: A meiofaunal “thiobios” limited to the anaerobic sulfide system of marine sand does not exist. Mar. Biol. 54, 225–237 (1979)Google Scholar
  20. Sterrer, W. and R. Rieger: Retronectidae—a new cosmopolitan family of Catenulida (Turbellaria). In: Biology of the Turbellaria, Libbie B. Hyman Memorial Volume, pp 63–92. Ed. by N. W. Riser and M. P. Morse. New York: McGraw-Hill 1974Google Scholar
  21. Weber, R. E.: Relation between functional and molecular properties of annelid haemoglobins. Interaction between haems in the haemoglobin of Arenicola marina L. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 35, 179–189 (1970)Google Scholar
  22. Wells, G. P.: Respiratory movements of Arenicola marina L.: intermittent irrigation of the tube, and intermittent aerial respiration. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 28, 447–464 (1949)Google Scholar
  23. Zebe, E.: In vivo—Untersuchungen uber den Glucose-Abbau bei Arenicola marina (Annelida, Polychaeta). J. comp. Physiol. 101, 133–145 (1975)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. J. S. Boaden
    • 1
  1. 1.Marine Biology StationThe Queen's University of BelfastPortaferryNorthern Ireland

Personalised recommendations