Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 56, Issue 4, pp 281–293 | Cite as

Vanadium transfer in the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis

  • P. Miramand
  • J. C. Guary
  • S. W. Fowler
Article

Abstract

Radiotracers were used to study processes controlling the accumulation and elimination of vanadium in the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Vanadium uptake rates varied inversely with both salinity and vanadium concentration in water, but were independent of temperature. After a 3 wk exposure to 48V, the highest concentration factors were found in the byssus (≈1900) with much lower values computed for shell (≈ 70) and soft tissues (≈5). More than 90% of the total 48V accumulated was fixed to shell, suggesting that uptake is primarily a result of surface sorption processes. Much of the vanadium in shell was firmly bound to the periostracum and was not easily removed by acid leaching. Food-chain experiments indicated that the assimilation coefficient for ingested vanadium is low (≈7%) and that the assimilated fraction is rapidly excreted from the mussel. These findings coupled with knowledge of in situ and experimentally-derived vanadium concentration-factors have allowed a preliminary assessment of the relative importance of the food and water pathways in the contamination of mussels under conditions of acute and chronic exposure. Contaminated mussels transferred to clean sea water lost 48V at rates that depended upon temperature but were largely unaffected by either salinity or by vanadium levels in mussel tissues. Total vanadium depuration was slow and was governed by loss from a slowly-exchanging compartment with a characteristic half-time of about 100 d. Individual mussel tissues were analyzed for stable vanadium and the possibility of using these tissues, particularly the byssus, as bioindicators of ambient vanadium levels in the marine environment is also discussed.

Keywords

Vanadium Assimilation Sorption Process Acid Leaching Mussel Tissue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Alexander, G. V. and D. R. Young: Trace metals in southern Californian mussels. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 7, 7–9 (1976)Google Scholar
  2. Bertine, K. K. and E. D. Goldberg: Fossil fuel combustion and the major sedimentary cycle. Science, N.Y. 173, 233–235 (1971)Google Scholar
  3. Bertine, K. K. and E. D. Goldberg: Trace elements in clams, mussels and shrimp. Limnol. Oceanogr. 17, 877–884 (1972)Google Scholar
  4. Bertine, K. K. and E. D. Goldberg: History of heavy metal pollution in southern California coastal zone-reprise. Envir. Sci. Technol. 11, 297–299 (1977)Google Scholar
  5. Brooks, R. R. and M. G. Rumsby: The biochemistry of trace element uptake by some New Zealand bivalves. Limnol. Oceanogr. 10, 521–527 (1965)Google Scholar
  6. Brown, C. H.: Some structural proteins of Mytilus edulis. Q Jl microsc. Sci. 93, 487–502 (1952)Google Scholar
  7. Bryan, G. W.: Heavy metal contamination in the sea. In: Marine pollution, pp 185–302. Ed. by R. Johnston. London: Academic Press 1976Google Scholar
  8. Buat-Menard, P. and R. Chesselet: Variable influence of the atmospheric flux on the trace metal chemistry of oceanic suspended matter. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 42, 399–411 (1979)Google Scholar
  9. Burton, J. D.: Some problems concerning the marine geochemistry of vanadium. Nature, Lond. 212, 976–978 (1966)Google Scholar
  10. Danskin, G. P.: Accumulation of heavy metals by some solitary tunicates. Can. J. Zool. 56, 547–551 (1978)Google Scholar
  11. Duce, R. A. and G. L. Hoffman: Atmospheric vanadium transport to the ocean. Atmosph. Environ. 10, 989–996 (1976)Google Scholar
  12. Fowler, S. W. and G. Benayoun: Experimental studies on cadmium flux through marine biota. In: Comparative studies of food and environmental contamination, pp 159–178. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency 1974Google Scholar
  13. Fowler, S. W. and G. Benayoun: Accumulation and distribution of selenium in mussel and shrimp tissues. Bull. envir. Contam. Toxicol. 16, 339–346 (1976a)Google Scholar
  14. Fowler, S. W. and G. Benayoun: Influence of environmental factors on selenium flux in two marine invertebrates. Mar. Biol. 37, 59–68 (1976b)Google Scholar
  15. Fowler, S. W. and J. C. Guary: High absorption efficiency for ingested plutonium in crabs. Nature, Lond. 266, 827–828 (1977)Google Scholar
  16. Fowler, S. W., M. Heyraud and T. M. Beasley: Experimental studies on plutonium kinetics in marine biota. In: Impacts of nuclear releases into the aquatic environment, pp 157–177. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency 1975Google Scholar
  17. Fowler, S. W., M. Heyraud and J. La Rosa. Factors affecting methyl and inorganic mercury dynamics in mussels and shrimp. Mar. Biol. 46, 267–276 (1978)Google Scholar
  18. Fowler, S. W. and B. Oregioni: Trace metals in mussels from the N.W. Mediterranean. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 7, 26–29 (1976)Google Scholar
  19. GESAMP: Review of harmful substances. Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Pollution (GESAMP)-supplement to the report of the sixth session, 26 pp. (GESAMP VI/10/Suppl. 1) London: Intergovernmental Maritime Consultative Organization (IMCO)Google Scholar
  20. Goldberg, E. D., V. T. Bowen, J. W. Farrington, G. Harvey, J. H. Martin, P. L. Parker, R. W. Risebrough, W. Robertson, E. Schneider and E. Gamble: The mussel watch. Envir. Conserv. 5, 101–125 (1978)Google Scholar
  21. Goldberg, E. D., W. S. Broecker, M. G. Gross and K. K. Turekian: Marine chemistry. In: Radioactivity in the marine environment, pp 137–146. Washington D.C.: National Academy of Science 1971Google Scholar
  22. Goldberg, E. D., W. McBlair and K. M. Taylor: The uptake of vanadium by tunicates. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 110, 84–94 (1951)Google Scholar
  23. Guary, J. C. and S. W. Fowler: Biokinetics of neptunium-237 in mussels and shrimp. Mar. Sci. Communs 3, 211–229 (1977)Google Scholar
  24. IDOE: Baseline studies of pollutants in the marine environment and research recommendations. In: International Decade of Ocean Exploration (IDOE) Baseline Conference, New York, pp 1–54. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences 1972Google Scholar
  25. Jackim, E., G. Morrison and R. Steele: Effects of environmental factors on radiocadmium uptake by four species of marine bivalves. Mar. Biol. 40, 303–308 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kustin, K., K. V. Ladd and G. C. McLeod: Site and rate of vanadium assimilation in the tunicate, Ciona intestinalis. J. gen. Physiol. 65, 315–328 (1975)Google Scholar
  27. Lowman, F. G., T. R. Rice and F. A. Richards: Accumulation and redistribution of radionuclides by marine organisms. In: Radioactivity in the marine environment, pp 161–199. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Science 1971Google Scholar
  28. Miramand, P. et M. Ünsal: Toxicité aigue du vanadium vis-à-vis de quelques espèces benthiques et phytoplanctoniques marines. Chemosphere 10, 827–832 (1978)Google Scholar
  29. Pentreath, R. J.: The accumulation from water of 65Zn, 54Mn, 58Co and 59Fe by the mussel, Mytilus edulis. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 53, 127–143 (1973)Google Scholar
  30. Phillips, D. J. H.: The common mussel Mytilus edulis as an indicator of pollution by zinc, cadmium, lead and copper. I. Effects of environmental variables on uptake of metals. Mar. Biol. 38, 59–69 (1976)Google Scholar
  31. Pyle, T. E. and T. T. Tieh: Strontium, vanadium and zinc in the shells of pteropods. Limnol. Oceanogr. 15, 153–154 (1970)Google Scholar
  32. Reichle, D. E.: Radioisotope turnover and energy flow in terrestrial isopod populations. Ecology 48, 351–366 (1967)Google Scholar
  33. Renfro, W. C., S. W. Fowler, M. Heyraud and J. La Rosa: Relative importance of food and water in long-term zinc-65 accumulation by marine biota. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 32, 1339–1345 (1975)Google Scholar
  34. Segar, D. A., J. D. Collins and J. P. Riley: The distribution of the major and some minor elements in marine animals. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 51, 131–136 (1971)Google Scholar
  35. Swinehart, J. H., W. R. Biggs, D. J. Halko and N. C. Schroeder: The vanadium and selected metal contents of some ascidians. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 146, 302–312 (1974)Google Scholar
  36. Termier, G. et H. Termier: La texture du test des mollusques fossiles et actuels. Haliotis, Paris 2, 89–119 (1972)Google Scholar
  37. Ünlü, M. Y. and S. W. Fowler: Factors affecting the flux of arsenic through the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis. Mar. Biol. 51, 209–219 (1979)Google Scholar
  38. Ünsal, M.: Contribution à l'étude de la toxicité du vanadium vis-à-vis des organismes marins, 85 pp. Thése Dr. 3e cycle, Université Paris 6, 1978Google Scholar
  39. Van Weers, A. W.: Uptake and loss of 65Zn and 60Co by the mussel Mytilus edulis L. In: Radioactive contamination of the marine environment, pp 385–401. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency 1973Google Scholar
  40. Walsh, P. R. and R. A. Duce: The solubilization of anthropogenic atmospheric vanadium in sea water. Geophys. Res. Lett. 3, 375–378 (1976)Google Scholar
  41. Waters, M. D.: Toxicology of vanadium. Adv. mod. Toxicol. 2, 147–189 (1977)Google Scholar
  42. Weiss, H. V., M. A. Guttman, J. Korkisch and I. Steffan: Comparison of methods for the determination of vanadium in sea-water. Talanta 24, 509–511 (1977)Google Scholar
  43. Young, D. R. and T. R. Folsom: Loss of 65Zn from the California sea mussel Mytilus californianus. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 133, 438–447 (1967)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Miramand
    • 1
  • J. C. Guary
    • 1
  • S. W. Fowler
    • 1
  1. 1.Musée OcéanographiqueInternational Laboratory of Marine RadioactivityPrincipality of Monaco

Personalised recommendations