Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 120, Issue 1, pp 33–39 | Cite as

Gene flow among vestimentiferan tube worm (Riftia pachyptila) populations from hydrothermal vents of the eastern Pacific

  • M. B. Black
  • R. A. Lutz
  • R. C. Vrijenhoek
Article
  • 189 Downloads

Abstract

Allozyme data are presented for six discrete populations of the giant hydrothermal vent tube worm Riftia pachyptila Jones, 1981 collected throughout the species' known range along mid-ocean spreading ridges of the eastern Pacific Ocean. Contrary to an earlier report, levels of genetic variation are relatively high in this species. Estimates of gene flow based on F-statistics revealed that dispersal throughout the surveyed region is sufficiently high to counter random processes that would lead to losses of genetic diversity and significant population differentiation. R. pachyptila, like other species of tube worms, displays considerable morphologic variation among populations, but this diversity is not reflected in allozyme variation. Vestimentifera, in general, appear to show extensive phenotypic plasticity. In the light of the available genetic data, caution is warranted when making inferences about the taxonomic status of collections based on morphological variation alone. A general decrease in estimated rates of gene flow between geographically more distant populations supports the hypothesis that dispersal in this species follows a stepping-stone model, with exchange between neighboring populations in great excess of long-distance dispersal. High levels of gene flow have been recorded in a variety of vent fauna and may be a prerequisite for success of species found in the ephemeral habitats associated with regions of sea-floor hydrothermal activity.

Keywords

Gene Flow Hydrothermal Vent Spreading Ridge Neighboring Population Eastern Pacific Ocean 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aebersold PB, Winans GA, Teel DJ, Milner GB, Utter FM (1987) Manual for starch gel electrophoresis: a method for the detection of genetic variation. U. S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries ServiceGoogle Scholar
  2. Black MB (1991) Genetic (allozyme) variation in Vestimentifera (Ridgeia spp.) from hydrothermal vents of the Jaun de Fuca Ridge (Northeast Pacific Ocean). M. Sci. thesis, University of Victoria, BC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  3. Bucklin A (1988) Allozymic variability of Riftia pachyptila populations from the Galápagos Rift and 21°N hydrothermal vents. Deep-Sea Res 35:1759–1768Google Scholar
  4. Cary, SC, Felbeck H, Holland ND (1989) Observations on the reproductive biology of the hydrothermal vent tube worm Riftia pachyptila. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 52:89–94Google Scholar
  5. Clayton JW, Tretiak DN (1972) Amine-citrate buffers for pH control in starch gel electrophoresis. J Fish Res Bd Can 29:1169–1172Google Scholar
  6. Elston RC, Forthofer R (1977) Testing for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in small samples. Biometrics 33:536–542Google Scholar
  7. France SC, Hessler RR, Vrijenhoek RC (1992) Genetic differentiation between spatially-disjunct populations of the deep-sea, hydrothermal vent-endemic amphipod Ventiella sulfuris. Mar Biol 11:551–559Google Scholar
  8. Gilpin ME (1991) The genetic effective size of a metapopulation. Biol J Linn Soc 42:165–175Google Scholar
  9. Grassle JF (1986) The ecology of deep-sea hydrothermal vent communities. Adv mar Biol 23:301–362Google Scholar
  10. Grassle JP (1985) Genetic differentiation in populations of hydrothermal vent mussels (Bathymodiolus thermophilus) from the Galápagos Rift and 13°N on the East Pacific Rise. Bull biol Soc Wash 64:429–442Google Scholar
  11. Haymon RM, Fornari DJ, Von Damm KL, Lilley MD, Perfit MR, Edmonds JM, Shanks WC III, Lutz RA, Grebmair JM, Carbotte S, Wright D, McLaughlin E, Smith M, Beedle N, Olson E (1993) Volcanic eruption of the mid-ocean ridge along the East Pacific Rise crest at 9°45–52′N: direct submersible observations of sea-floor phenomena associated with an eruption event in April, 1991. Earth planet Sci Lett 119:85–101Google Scholar
  12. International Union of Biochemistry (1984) Enzyme nomenclature. Academic Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones M (1984) The giant tube worms. Oceanus 27:47–52Google Scholar
  14. Jones ML (1981) Riftia pachyptila, new genus, new species, the vestimentiferan worm from the Galapagos Rift geothermal vents (Pogonophora). Proc biol Soc Wash 93:1295–1313Google Scholar
  15. Jones ML (1985) On the Vestimentifera, new phylum: six new species, and other taxa, from hydrothermal vents and elsewhere. Bull biol Soc Wash 6:117–158Google Scholar
  16. Jones ML, Gardiner SL (1989) On the early development of the vestimentiferan tube worm Ridgea sp. and Riftia pachyptila. Biol Bull mar biol Lab, Woods Hole 177:254–276Google Scholar
  17. Kimura M, Weiss WH (1964) The stepping stone model of genetic structure and the decrease of genetic correlation with distance. Genetics, Princeton 49:561–576Google Scholar
  18. Levene H (1949) On a matching problem arising in genetics. Ann math Statist 20:91–94Google Scholar
  19. Li CC, Horvitz DG (1953) Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient. Am J hum Genet 95:107–117Google Scholar
  20. Lutz RA (1988) Dispersal of organisms at deep-sea hydrothermal vents: a review. Oceanol Acta (Spec Vol) 8:23–30Google Scholar
  21. Lutz RA, Bouchet P, Jablonski D, Turner RD, Waren A (1986) Larval ecology of mollusks at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Am malac Bull 4:49–54Google Scholar
  22. Malécot G (1968) The mathematics of heredity. W. H. Freeman & Co., San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  23. Maruyama T, Kimura M (1980). Genetic variabilityand effective population size when local extinciton and recolonization of subpopulations are frequent. Proc natn Acad Sci USA 77:6710–6714Google Scholar
  24. Murphy RW, Sites JW Jr, Buth DG, Haufler CH (1990) Proteins I: Isozyme electrophoresis. In: Hillis D, Moritz C (eds) Molecular systematics. Sinauer Assoc. Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp 45–126Google Scholar
  25. Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc natn Acad Sci USA 70:3321–3323Google Scholar
  26. Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics, Austin, Tex 89:583–590Google Scholar
  27. Nei M, Chesser RK (1983) Estimation of fixation indices and gene diversities. Ann hum Genet 47:253–259Google Scholar
  28. Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1–10Google Scholar
  29. Nevo E, Beiles A, Ben-Shlomo R (1983) The evolutionary significance of genetic diversity: ecological, demographic and life history correlates. Lecture Notes Biomaths 53:13–213Google Scholar
  30. Rona PA (1987) Oceanic ridge crest processes. Rev Geophys 25:1089–1114Google Scholar
  31. Shaw CR, Prasad R (1970) Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes —a compilation of recipes. Biochem Genet 4:297–320Google Scholar
  32. Slatkin M (1977) Gene flow and genetic drift in a species subject to frequent local extinctions. Theor Popul Biol 12:253–262Google Scholar
  33. Slatkin M (1993) Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution 47:264–279Google Scholar
  34. Sokal RR, Wartenberg DE (1983) A test of spatial autocorrelation analysis using an isolation-by-distance model. Genetics, Austin, Tex 105:219–237Google Scholar
  35. Southward EC (1988) Development of the gut and segmentation of newly settled stages of Ridgeia (Vestimentifera): implications for relationship between Vestimentifera and Pogonophora. J mar Biol Ass UK 68:465–487Google Scholar
  36. Swofford DL, Selander RK (1981) BIOSYS-1: a Fortran program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. J Hered 72:281–283Google Scholar
  37. Thorpe JP (1983) Enzyme variation, genetic distance and evolutinary divergence in relation to levels of taxonomic separation. In: Oxford GS, Rollinson D (eds) Protein polymorphism: adaptive and taxonomic significance. Academic Press, New York, pp 131–152Google Scholar
  38. Tunnicliffe V (1988) Biogeography and evolution of hydrothermalvent fauna in the eastern Pacific Ocean. Proc R Soc (Ser B) 233:347–366Google Scholar
  39. Tunnicliffe V (1991) The biology of hydrothermal vents: ecology and evolution. Oceanogr mar Biol A Rev 29:319–407Google Scholar
  40. Wade MJ, McCauley DE (1988) Extinction and recolonization: their effects on the genetic differentiation of local populations. Evolution 42:995–1005Google Scholar
  41. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370Google Scholar
  42. Workman PL, Niswander JD (1970) Population studies on South-western Indian tribes. II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago. Am J hum Genet 22:24–49Google Scholar
  43. Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, Princeton 16:97–159Google Scholar
  44. Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics, Princeton 28: 114–138Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. B. Black
    • 1
  • R. A. Lutz
    • 1
  • R. C. Vrijenhoek
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Theoretical and Applied GeneticsCook College, Rutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations