Skip to main content
Log in

Fixed bed porous glass sphere (porosphere) bioreactors for animal cells

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Cytotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Process intensity of fixed bed glass sphere culture systems is increased considerably by replacing solid glass spheres with open pore glass spheres. This technique demonstrates the possibility of having a system capable of both volumetric and cell density scale up and being suitable for substrate attached and suspension cells. The yields achieved for a number of attached cell lines (approximately 107/ml) demonstrate an increase approaching one order of magnitude over solid glass spheres (approximately 106/ml). Also suspension cells were successfully entrapped in the open pore structure with similar yields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berg GJ (1985) An integrated system for large scale cell culture. Develop. Biol. Standard. 60: 297–303.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Browne PC, Figueroa C, Costello MAC, Oakely and Maciukas SM (1988) Protein production from mammalian cells grown on glass beads. In: Spier RE and Griffiths JB (eds) Animal cell Biotechnology Vol. 3 (pp. 251–262) Academic Press Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burbidge C (1980) The mass culture of human diploid fibroblasts in packed beds of glass beads. Develop. Biol. Standard. 46: 169–172.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Duff RU (1985) Microencapsulation technology: a novel method for monoclonal antibody production. Trends in Biotechnol. 3: 167–170.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Griffiths JB, Cameron DR and Looby D (1987a) Bulk production of anchorage dependent cells — comparative studies. In: Webb C and Mavituna F (eds) Plant and Animal Cells: process possibilities (pp. 149–161) Ellis Horwood, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Griffiths JB, Cameron DR and Looby D (1987b) A comparison of unit process systems for anchorage dependent cells. Develop. Biol. Standard. 66: 331–338.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Griffiths JB (1988) Overview of cell culture systems and their scale-up. In: Spier RE and Griffiths JB (eds) Animal Cell Biotechnology Vol. 3 (pp. 179–220) Academic Press Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Griffiths JB, Thornton B and McEntee I (1982) The development and use of microcarrier and glass sphere culture techniques for the production of Herpes simplex virus. Develop. Biol. Standard. 50: 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hayman EG, Ray NG and Runstadler Jr PW (1988) Production of biomolecules by cells cultured in tri-dimensional collagen microspheres. In: Moody DU and Baker PB (eds) Bioreactors and Biotransformations (pp. 99–110) Elsevier, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hirschel MD and Gruenberg ML (1988) An automated hollowfibre system for the large scale manufacture of cell secreted products. In: Lydersen BK (ed) Large Scale Cell Culture Technology (pp. 114–144) Hansen, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kadouri A, Sher D and Maroudas NC (1988) Polystyrene substratum for bulk culture of anchorage dependent cells. Cytotechnology, in press.

  12. Kearns M, Comer MJ, Steegmans O and Jungter H (1986) Verfahren und vorriontung zum kultivieren von zelien. European patent office EPO 224 800 AZ.

  13. Lazar A, Ruveny S, Mizrahi A, Avtalion M, Whiteside JP and Spier RE (1987) Production of biologicals by animal cells immobilized in polyurethane foam matrix. In: Spier RE and Griffiths JB (eds) Modern Approaches to Animal Cell Technology (pp. 437–448) Butterworths, Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Looby D and Griffiths JB (1987) Optimisation of glasssphere immobilised bed cultures. In: Spier RE and Griffiths JB (eds) Modern Approaches to Animal Cell Technology (pp. 342–352) Butterworths, Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McCoy TA, Whittle W and Conway E (1962) A glass helix perfusion chamber for massive growth of cells in vitro. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 109: 235–237.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murdin AD, Thorpe JS, Kirby N, Groves DJ and Spier RE (1987) Immobilisation and growth of hybridomas in packed beds. In: Moody GW and Baker PB (eds) Bioreactors and Biotransformations (pp. 99–110) Elsevier, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nilsson K, Buzsaky F and Mosbach K (1986) Growth of anchorage-dependent cells on macroporous microcarriers. Bio/Technology 4: 989–990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robinson NH, Butlin PM and Imrie RC (1980) Growth characteristics of human diploid fibroblasts in packed beds of glass beads. Develop. Biol. Standard. 46: 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Runstadler PW and Cernek SR (1988) Large scale Fluidised-bed, immobilised cultivation of animal cells at high densities In: Spier RE and Griffiths JB (eds) Animal Cell Biotechnology Vol. 3 (pp. 305–320) Academic Press Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scheirer W (1988) High-density growth of animal cells within cell retention fermenters equipped with membranes. In: Spier RE and Griffiths JB (eds) Animal Cell Biotechnology Vol. 3 (pp. 263–281) Academic Press Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Spier RE (1985) Monolayer growth systems: heterogeneous unit processes. In: Spier RE and Griffiths JE (eds) Animal Cell Biotechnology Vol. 1 (pp. 243–263) Academic Press Inc., London.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Spier RE and Whiteside JP (1976) The production of foot-and-mouth disease virus from BHK 21 C13 cells grown on the surface of glass spheres. Biotech. Bioeng. 18: 649–657.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tyo MA and Spier RE (1987) Dense cultures of animal cells at the industrial scale. Enzyme and Microb. Technol. 9: 514–520.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tharakan JP and Chau PC (1986) A radial flow hollow fiber reactor for the large scale culture of mammalian cells. Biotech. Bioeng. 28: 329–324.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Van Wezel AL (1984) Microcarrier technology — present status and prospects. Develop. Biol. Standard. 55: 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Whiteside JP and Spier RE (1981) The scale-up from 0.1 to 100 litre of a unit process system based on 3mm diameter glass spheres for the production of our strains of FMDV from BHK monolayer cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 23: 551–565.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Looby, D., Griffiths, J.B. Fixed bed porous glass sphere (porosphere) bioreactors for animal cells. Cytotechnology 1, 339–346 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365079

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365079

Key words

Navigation