Skip to main content
Log in

Sensors and techniques used to monitor processing parameters during spray atomization and deposition

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emerging field of atomization and spray deposition is continually striving to improve the quality of its final products. A major obstacle to achieving consistently high-quality end products is the lack of ability to monitor the various operational parameters associated with spray processes. This paper will present a discussion of the diagnostic techniques that are currently available for monitoring processing parameters, such as droplet size, velocity, and concentration, as well as droplet temperatures and size distributions. To that effect, several methods for obtaining on-line feedback of these parameters are discussed and compared. Techniques such as high-speed cinematography, off-axis holographic cinematography and infrared thermal imaging, are compared and evaluated for their utility in providing information which will elucidate relevant atomization phenomena. In addition, the PCSV-P probe, phase Doppler particle analysis, EPMP monitor, and intelligent sensors are also reviewed and discerned for their usefulness, in making spray atomization and deposition a more controlled process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

P 0 :

Gas jet stagnation pressure

P e :

Gas jet exit pressure

P dt :

Liquid delivery tube pressure

P r :

Reservoir pressure

D dt :

Outer diameter of liquid delivery tube = 9.91 mm

D 1 :

Inner diameter of liquid delivery tube = 3.00 mm

D a :

Inter-jet diameter = 10.69 mm

d j :

Individual jet diameter = 0.79 mm

f :

Next state function

g :

Output function

U k :

Control input at time k

X k :

State of the system at time k

X x+1 :

State of the system at time k+1

Y k :

Measurable output of the system at time k

Z dt :

Liquid delivery tube extent out of the jet exit plane = 2.54 mm

α j :

Individual jet angle = 22.5° with respect to the axis of symmetry of delivery tube

References

  1. X. Liang, J. C. Earthman and E. J. Lavernia, Acta Metall. Mater. 40 (1992) 2923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Wu and E. J. Lavernia, Metall. Trans. 23A (1992) 2937.

    Google Scholar 

  3. X. Zeng, H. Liu, M. Chu and E. J. Lavernia, ibid. 23A (1993) 3394.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Perez, J. Zhang, M. Gungor and E. J. Lavernia, ibid. 24A (1993) 701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Jiang, G. Henein and M. W. Siegel, J. Powder Metall. 26 (1990) 253.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. W. Siegel, and H. Henein, in “Synthesis and Analysis in Materials Processing: Characterization and Diagnostics of Ceramic and Metal Particulate Processing”, edited by E. J. Lavernia, H. Henein and I. Anderson (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1989) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Henein and P. L. Meyer, J. Powder Metall. 28 (1992) 149.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. W. Lauterborn and A. Judt, Optics Lett. 18 (1993) 4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. R. W. Whatmore, Ferroelectrics 118 (1991) 241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. D. Ridder, F. S. Biancaniello, P. I. Espina and S. A. Miller, in “Synthesis and Analysis in Materials Processing: Characterization and Diagnostics of Ceramic and Metal Particulate Processing”, edited by E. J. Lavernia, H. Henein and I. Anderson (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1989) p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. D. Ridder, S. A. Osella, P. I. Espina and F. S. Biancaniello, J. Powder Metall. 28 (1992) 133.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. B. Cantor and B. P. Bewlay, Metall. Trans. 21B (1990) 899.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Cantor and P. S. Grant, Scripta Metall. 23 (1989) 1651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. F. Gataska, General Electric Corp. Lynn, MA, private communication (1990).

  15. V. G. Mcdonell, E. J. Lavernia and G. S. Samuelsen, in “Synthesis and Analysis in Materials Processing: Characterization and Diagnostics of Ceramic and Metal Particulate Processing”, edited by E. J. Lavernia, H. Henein and I. Anderson (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1989) p.13.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Kumar, T. V. Balasubramanian and R. D. K. Misra, Sci. Lett. 9 (1990) 147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. L. Salgado, and F. A. Filho, Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstuct. Process. 133 (1991) 692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. F. S. Biancaniello, J. J. Conway, P. I. Espina, G. E. Mattingly and S. D. Ridder, Mater. Sci. Eng. A124 (1990) 9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. S. A. Osella, S. D. Ridder, F. S. Biancaniello and P. I. Espina, J. Mater. 43 (1991) 18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. F. S. Biancaniello, P. I. Espina, G. E. Mattingly and S. D. Ridder, Mater. Sci. Eng. A119 (1989) 161.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. F. S. Biancaniello, C. Presser and S. D. Ridder, ibid. A124 (1990) 21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. P. Mathur, S. Annavarapu, D. Apelian and A. Lawley, J. Mater. 41 (1989) 23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Idem Mater. Sci. Eng. A142 (1991) 261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Annavarapu, D. Apelian and A. Lawley, Metall. Trans. 21A (1990) 3237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lawrynowicz, D.E., Lavernia, E.J. Sensors and techniques used to monitor processing parameters during spray atomization and deposition. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE 30, 1125–1138 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00356110

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00356110

Keywords

Navigation