Skip to main content
Log in

ΔK ol level effects on fatigue crack propagation

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to determine the effects of ΔK ol level on fatigue life, a single peak load was applied at distinct ΔK levels of 7.8×10.3 and 9.8×103 p.s.i. in1/2. Here the ΔK ol level was defined to be a ΔK level at which overload was applied. Three different overload ratios of 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 were used to determine the overload ratio effect on the recovery factor. The result showed that the recovery factor, Z, was linearly related to ΔK as Z = qΔK+Z o, where q was a function of overload ratio. The value of q decreased as the overload ratio increased in a given ΔK ol level and seemed to be an important factor as well as retardation cycles in determining the fatigue life. For the same overload ratio, specimens that underwent overload at a smaller ΔK ol level showed more improved fatigue life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a :

Crack length

a * :

Overload affected zone size

B :

Specimen thickness

(da/dN)ca :

Crack growth rate due to constant amplitude fatigue load

(da/dN)ol :

Crack growth rate after overload is applied

E :

Young's modulus

K :

Stress intensity factor

K min :

Minimum stress intensity factor

K max :

Maximum stress intensity factor

ΔK ol :

ΔK level at which overload is applied

N :

Number of cycles

N D :

Number of delayed cycles

N f :

Number of cycles needed for a specimen to be completely fractured

r p :

Assumed plastic zone size

S :

Load

σys :

Yield stress

W :

Width

Z :

Recovery factor

References

  1. E. F. J. Von Euw, R. W. Hertzberg and R. Roberts, “Stress Analysis and Growth of Cracks”, ASTM STP 513 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1972) pp. 247–311.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. R. Rice, “Mechanics of Crack Tip Deformation and Extension by Fatigue”, ASTM STP 415 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1967) pp. 49–76.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Ohji, K. Ogura and Y. Ohkubo, Eng. Fract. Mech. 7 (1975) 457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Elber, ibid., 2 (1970) 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Schijve, “Observations on the Prediction of Fatigue Crack Growth Propagation under Variable Amplitude Loading”, ASTM STP 595 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1976) pp. 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Bathias and M. Vancon, Eng. Fract. Mech. 10 (1978) 409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. G. Russell, ibid. 33 (1989) 839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Yildirim and O. Vardar, ibid. 36 (1990) 71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G. R. Chanani, Metals Eng. Q. 15 (1975) 40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Jonas and R. P. Wei, Int. J. Fract. 7 (1971) 116.

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. J. Mills and R. W. Hertzberg, Eng. Fract. Mech. 7 (1975) 705.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rhee, K.Y. ΔK ol level effects on fatigue crack propagation. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE 29, 6501–6504 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354011

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354011

Keywords

Navigation