Abstract
The sampling performance of two high-speed samplers, (Delfino I and II), fitted with a calibrated flow meter, was studied in the open Ligurian Sea using a battery comprising 6 such Delfinos linked together. Since, in plankton counts, only those organisms should be counted which are definitely retained in the nets, several techniques for the separation of the organisms which pass through the pore of a net of a given pore size and those which are safely retained were tested. Attempts to separate these two fractions by filtration of the fixed sample through nets of different pore sizes were not successful, as living organisms were able to pass through pore sizes which retained dead organisms. However, optical sizing under the dissecting microscope during counting gave reproducible results. Using this counting technique, the influence of the pore size of plankton nets on the reproducibility of sampling of natural populations was studied. The results obtained show that live plankton passes through the net pores at a size at which fixed plankton is retained. Hence, the minimum retention size for living and dead plankton is different. By comparing samples taken with nets of different pore sizes, and counting the organisms caught according to different sizes, it was possible to determine the minimum retention size of live plankton organisms for several different net pore-sizes. The minimum retention size is, therefore, the smallest pore size at which the organisms of a certain width cannot escape through the pores of the net and are, thus, quantitatively retained in the net. By applying the criterion of minimum retention size, the influence of speed towing on the number of plankton organisms caught was studied. It was shown that the number of organisms which are safely retained, i.e., do not escape through the pores, increased with speed, reaching a plateau at 5 to 7 knots.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Anonymous: Zooplankton sampling. Monographs on oceanographic methodology, No. 2. pp 1–174. Ed. by UNESCO. Paris: UNESCO 1968.
Bernhard, M.: Studies on the radioactive contamination of the sea. Annual Report 1966. CNEN Report No RT/BIO (67) 35, EUR 3635e. Luxembourg: Office des Publications, Case Postale 1003, Officielles des Communautés Européennes 1967.
Bernhard, M. and A. Nassogne: Influence of pore size of plankton and towing speed on the sampling performances of a high-speed sampler (Delfino I) and its consequences for the enumeration of plankton organisms. I Scien. Meeting Woods Hole, USA, May, 1968 (Summary only). Symposium on design and analysis in plankton sampling. F.A.O. Fish. Circ. No. 125. FIRM/G 125 (1968).
— and L. Rampi: The annual cycle of the “Utermoehl-phytoplankton” in the Ligurian Sea in 1959 and 1962. Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli 35, 137–169 (1967).
Clarke, G. L. and D. F. Bumpus: Brief account of a plankton sampler. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 39, 190–192 (1939).
Gibbons, S. G.: A new type of sampler for use in the quantitative analysis of plankton collections. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer 8, 195–200 (1933).
Hardy, A. C.: The continuous plankton recorder: a new method of survey. Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer 95, 35–47 (1932).
Lund, J. W. G., C. Kipling and E. D. Le Creen: The inverted microscope method of estimating algae numbers and statistical basis of estimations by counting. Hydrobiologia 11, 143–170 (1958).
Nassogne, A.: Etudes préliminaires sur le role du zooplancton dans la constitution et le transfert de la matière organique au sein de la chaine alimentaire marine en Mer Ligure. pp 1–237. Publication EUR 4823 f. Luxembourg: Office des Publications Officielles des Communautés Europeennes, Case Postale 1003, 1972.
— e M. Bernhard: Campionamento quantitativo di zooplankton con un campionatore ad alta velocità (Delfino I). Pubbl. Staz. zool. Napoli (Suppl. 2) 37, 219–236 (1969).
—: Echantillonage quantitatif du zooplancton. XXI Congrès CIESM Monaco, sept. 1968. Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Commn int. Explor. scient. Mer Méditerr. 20, 1–299 (1971).
Neunes, H.: Comparison of the sampling performance of a high-speed sampler, in Clarke Bumpus sampler and ring net. (Unpublished). Symposium on the Hydrodynamics of Plankton samplers, CSIRO, Cronulla Australia (1966).
Saville, A.: Mesh selection in plankton nets. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer 23, 192–201 (1958).
Tranter, D. J. and A. C. Heron: Filtration characteristics of Clarke-Bumpus samplers. Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 16, 281–291 (1965).
—, J. D. Kerr and A. C. Heron: Effects of hauling speeds on zooplankton catches. Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 19, 65–75 (1969).
— and P. E. Smith: Filtration performances. In: Zooplankton sampling. Monographs on oceanographic methodology No. 2, pp 27–56. Ed. by UNESCO. Paris: UNESCO 1968.
Vannucci, M.: Loss of organisms through the meshes. In: Zooplankton sampling. Monographs on oceanographic methodology No. 2, pp 77–86. Ed. by UNESCO. Paris: UNESCO 1968.
Warren, P. J.: Description of an improved rotating counter for zooplankton. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer 23, 337–339 (1958).
Wiebe, P. H. and W. R. Holland: Plankton patchiness: effects on repeated net towns. Limnol. Oceanogr. 13, 315–321 (1968).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by B. Battaglia, Padua
A contribution under the Association Contract CNEN-EURATOM. Contribution No. 668 of the Euratom Biology Division.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernhard, M., Möller, F., Nassogne, A. et al. Influence of pore size of plankton nets and towing speed on the sampling performance of two high-speed samplers (Delfino I and II) and its consequences for the assessment of plankton populations. Marine Biology 20, 109–136 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351450
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351450