Abstract
The efficiency of the van Veen and Foerst ‘Petersen’ grabs used in sampling the bottom fauna near the Cochin Harbour area has been compared in two selected stations having different hydrographic and substratic conditions. The results indicate that the heavier grab is generally more efficient than a lighter one, especially when the substratum is sandy. An examination of the quantity of the sediment and the total number of species brought by the two grabs showed that the design of the van Veen is superior to the ‘Petersen’ type grab used in the present study. However, due to the highly patchy distribution of the organisms the superiority of the van Veen was less evident when a comparison was made of the total number of animals sampled by the two grabs. When the distribution is ‘bunched’ it is suggested that samples are drawn, as far as possible, from the same sampling position. The grabs should also be of the same weight and biting area.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Birkett, L.: A basis for comparing grabs. J. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer. 23, 202–207 (1958).
Desai, B. N., and M. Krishnan Kutty: Studies on the benthic fauna of the Cochin backwater. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 1966 (in press).
Desai, B. N., and M. Krishnan Kutty: A comparison of the marine and estuarine benthic fauna of the nearshore regions of the Arabian Sea. Read at the NISI/INCOR symposium on ‘Indian Ocean’, March 1967. Proc. natn. Inst. Sci. India 1967 (in press).
Ellis, D. V.: Marine infaunal benthos in Arctic North America. Arctic Inst. North America, Tech. paper No. 5, 53 pp. (1960).
Gallardo, V. A.: Observations on the biting profiles of three 0.1 m2 bottom samplers. Ophelia 2, 319–322 (1965).
Holme, N. A.: The biomass of the bottom fauna in the English Channel off Plymouth. J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K. 32, 1–49 (1953).
Hopkins, T. L.: A survey of marine bottom samplers. In: Progress in oceanography. 2, 213–254. Ed. by E. M. Sears. New York: Pergamon Press 1964.
Smith, W., and A. D. McIntyre: A spring-loaded bottom sampler J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K. 33, 257–264 (1954).
Thamdrup, H. M.: Der van Veen-Bodengreifer. Vergleichsversuche über die Leistungsfähigkeit des van Veen- und des Petersen-Bodengreifers. J. Cons. int. Explor. Mer. 13, 206–212 (1938).
Ubsin, E.: Efficiency of marine bottom samplers of the van Veen and Petersen types. Medd. Danm. Fisk.-og Havunders (Ser. 1) 7, 8 (1954).
—: Efficiency of marine bottom samplers with special reference to the Knudsen sampler. Medd. Danm. Fisk.-og Havunders (Ser. 1) 14, 6 (1956).
Welch, P. S.: Limnological methods. p. 381. Philadelphia: Blakiston 1948.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by N. K. Panikkar, New Delhi
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krishnan Kutty, M., Desai, B.N. A comparison of the efficiency of the bottom samplers used in benthic studies off Cochin. Marine Biol. 1, 168–171 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347106
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347106