Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of alachlor and two metabolites in groundwater using solid phase and a new micro-liquid-liquid extraction method

  • Original Papers
  • Environmental Analysis
  • Published:
Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two different extraction procedures to determine alachlor (2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-methoxymethyl-acetanilide) and its metabolites 2,6-diethylaniline (DEA) and 2-chloro-2′,6′-diethylacetanilide (CDEA) at very low concentration levels in groundwater are compared. Both methods were performed during a field leaching study and laboratory soil column experiments. Solid phase extraction (SPE) is characterized by the enrichment of 11 water samples at 1 g RP-C18 material, while micro liquid/liquid extraction (MLLE) means that 400 ml water samples saturated with sodium chloride were extracted once with 500 μl of toluene. Both methods differ in their concentration factors, i.e. 5000 for SPE and 800 for MLLE. The determination limits for alachlor determined as the lowest spiked concentration analyzed are 10 ng/l with SPE and 25 ng/l with MLLE. Even though the determination limits of the two methods are similar, the volatile metabolite 2,6-diethylaniline was not sufficiently recovered by SPE. Furthermore, SPE is more expensive and time consuming than MLLE. The latter is simple in use, rapidly performed and needs no evaporation step and clean-up before GC analysis. This is of special advantage for the analysis of 2,6-diethylaniline. The determination limits of the metabolites CDEA and DEA analyzed by MLLE are 25 ng/l. The extracts from both methods were directly analyzed by gas chromatography using electron capture and nitrogen-phosphorus detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heyer R, Stan HJ Intern J (1995) Environ Anal Chem (in press)

  2. Junk GA, Richard JJ (1988) Anal Chem 60:451–455

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks MW, Jenkins J, Jimenez M, Quinn T, Clark JM (1989) Analyst 114:405–406

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schütte SA, Smith RG, Holden LR, Graham JA (1990) Anal Chim Acta 236:141–144

    Google Scholar 

  5. Murray DA (1979) J Chromatogr 177:135–140

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blanchet PF (1979) J Chromatogr 179:123–129

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thielen DR, Olsen G, Davis A (1987) J Chromatogr Sci 25:12–16

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pereira WE, Rostad CE, Leiker TJ (1990) Anal Chim Acta 228:69–75

    Google Scholar 

  9. Potter TL, Carpenter T, Putnam R, Reddy K, Clark JM (1991) J Agric Food Chem 39:2184–2187

    Google Scholar 

  10. EEC Drinking Water Guideline, 80/779/EEC, EEC No. L229/11–29, Brussels, August 30, 1980

  11. Butz S, Heberer T, Stan HJ (1994) J Chromatogr 677:63–74

    Google Scholar 

  12. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (1991) Rückstandsanalytik von Pflanzenschutzmitteln 9. Lieferung. Kap. XI-A, XI-B. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  13. Linkerhägner M, Thesis (unpublished results)

  14. Zapf A, Heyer R, Stan HJ (1995) J Chromatogr (in press)

  15. Heyer R, Stan HJ, in preparation

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heyer, R., Zapf, A. & Stan, H.J. Determination of alachlor and two metabolites in groundwater using solid phase and a new micro-liquid-liquid extraction method. Fresenius J Anal Chem 351, 752–757 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323631

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323631

Keywords

Navigation