Abstract
This study examines on United Kingdom budget data the sensitivity of policy and welfare conclusions to the introduction of quantity constraint on Housing demand within a utility consistent framework. The paper proposes a rationed demographic demand system, based on extension of the idea of virtual price, and presents evidence that such a model could prove useful in the precise estimation of equivalence scales on budget data with limited price variation. The demand parameter estimates and their welfare implications are quite sensitive to the introduction of rationed demand. Unlike in previous studies, the rationed demand system fails to reject linear preferences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson AB (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory 2:244–263
Batten AP (1964) Family composition, prices and expenditure patterns. In: Hart PE, Mills G, Whittaker JK (eds) Econometric analysis for national economic planning. Butterworth, London, pp 277–292
Blundell RW, Ray R (1984) Testing for linear Engel curves and additively separable preferences using a new flexible demand system. Econ J 94:800–811
Economic Trends (1986) Annual supplement. Central Statistical Office, London
Hendry DF (1984) Econometric modelling of house prices in the UK: a study in econometric methodology. In: Hendry DF, Wallis KF (eds) Econometrics and quantitative economics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 237–260
Howard DH (1977) Rationing, quantity constraints and consumption theory. Econometrica 45:399–412
Irvine I, McCarthy C (1980) Further evidence on inflation and redistribution in the United Kingdom. Econ J 90:907–911
Iyengar NS, Bhattacharya N (1965) On the effect of differentials in consumer price index on measures of inequality. Sankhya (Series B) 27:47–56
Jorgenson DW, Slesnick DT (1987) Aggregate consumer behaviour and household equivalence scales. J Business Econ Statist 5(2):219–231
Kooreman P, Kapteyn A (1986) Estimation of rationed and unrationed household labour supply functions using flexible functional forms. Econ J 96:398–412
McClements LD (1977) Equivalence scales for children. J Public Econ 8:191–210
Muellbauer J (1974) Prices and inequality: the U.K. experience. Econ J 84:32–55
Neary JP, Roberts KWS (1980) The theory of household behaviour under rationing. Eur Econ Rev 13:25–42
Pollak RA (1969) Conditional demand functions and consumption theory. Q J Econ 83:60–78
Pollak RA, and Wales TJ (1981) Demographic variables in demand analysis. Econometrica 49:1533–1552
Prais SJ, Houthakker HS (1971) The analysis of family budgets, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ray R (1983) Measuring the costs of children: an alternative approach. J Public Econ 22:89–102
Ray R (1985a) Specification and time series estimation of dynamic Gorman polar form demand systems. Eur Econ Rev 27:357–374
Ray R (1985b) Prices, children and inequality: further evidence for the UK, 1965–1982. Econ J 95:1069–1077
Ray R (1986) Demographic variables and equivalence scales in a flexible demand system: the case of AIDS. Appl Econ 18(3):265–278
Rothbarth E (1941) The measurement of change in real income under conditions of rationing. Rev Econ Studies 8:100–107
Sah RK (1987) Queues, rations, and market: comparisons of outcomes for the poor and the rich. Am Econ Rev 77(1):69–77
Tobin J (1952) A survey of the theory of rationing. Econometrica 20:512–553
Tobin J, Houthakker HS (1951) The effects of rationing on demand elasticities. Rev Econ Studies 18:140–153
United Kingdom Family Expenditure Surveys (1968–1985) Department of Employment, H.M.S.O., London
Weitzman ML (1977) Is the price system or rationing more effective in getting a commodity to those who need it most? Bell J Econ 8:517–524
Wymer CR (1973) ‘ASIMUL’. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I am grateful to Arie Kapteyn and an anonymous referee for helpful written comments on an earlier version. I also thank seminar participants at the Second Annual Congress of the European Society of Population Economics at the University of Mannheim, West Germany in June 1988, at the University of NSW and Melbourne in Australia, and Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand for useful discussions. I retain responsibility for all errors that remain.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ray, R. The behavioural and welfare implications of housing demand under rationing. J Popul Econ 2, 211–224 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177324
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177324