Advertisement

Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 229–243 | Cite as

Retirement decisions in a discrete choice model and implications for the government budget The case of Belgium

  • G. Pepermans
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the determinants of the retirement decision of the elderly in Belgium. The model used is an extension of the participation model. It offers three choices: full-time work, part-time work and retirement. A CES-utility function is maximised over this opportunity set. Estimation was done on two separate samples for men and women. Using the estimation results, the financial consequences of some policy changes in the social security system are calculated.

Keywords

Social Security Estimation Result Policy Change Choice Model Security System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashworth JS, Ulph DT (1981) Household models. In: Brown CV (ed) Taxation and labour supply. Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Boskin MJ (1977) Social security and retirement decisions. Econ Inquiry 15:1–25Google Scholar
  3. Boskin MJ, Hurd DH (1978) The effect of social security on early retirement. J Public Econ 10:361–378Google Scholar
  4. Burtless F, Hausman JA (1978) The effect of taxation on labor supply: Evaluating the Gary negative income tax experiment. J Polit Econ 86:1103–1130Google Scholar
  5. Burtless F, Moffitt RA (1984) The effect of social security benefits of the labor supply of the aged. In: Aaron HJ, Burtless F (eds) Retirement and economic behavior. Studies in Social Economics Series. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, pp 135–171Google Scholar
  6. Haveman R, Wolfe B, Warlick J (1988) Labor market behavior of older men. Estimates from a trichotomous choice model. J Public Econ 36:153–175Google Scholar
  7. Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47:153–161Google Scholar
  8. Lazear EP (1986) Retirement from the labor force. In: Ashenfelter O, Layard R (eds) Handbook of labor economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 305–355Google Scholar
  9. Maddala GS (1983) Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Pencavel J (1986) Labor supply of men: A survey. In: Ashenfelter O, Layard R (eds) Handbook of labor economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 3–102Google Scholar
  11. Wales TJ, Woodland AD (1979) Labour supply and progressive taxes. Rev Econ Stud 46:89–95Google Scholar
  12. Zabalza A, Piachaud D (1981) Social security and the elderly: a simulation of policy changes. J Public Econ 16:145–169Google Scholar
  13. Zabalza A, Pissarides C, Barton M (1980) Special security and the choice between full-time work, part-time work and retirement. J Public Econ 14:245–276Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Pepermans
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Economic StudiesCatholic University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations