Skip to main content
Log in

A novel acid proteinase relased by hybridoma cells

  • Original Research Papers
  • Published:
Cytotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An acid proteinase has been detected in culture supernate of the 9.2.27 murine hybridoma. This enzyme extensively degrades albumin and transferrin during short incubations at pH 3 and below. Limited proteolysis of the 9.2.27 IgG2a appears to occur in the culture supernate. Proteolysis is enhanced at low pH in the presence of urea or 1 M acetic acid. The proteinase activity accumulates in continuous perfusion, total cell recycle cultures, beginning during exponential growth of the hybridoma. It is destroyed by boiling and blocked by pepstatin, but not by inhibitors of cysteine or serine proteinases or by EDTA. The low pH optimum may distinguish this enzyme from the known rat and mouse aspartic acid proteinases including cathepsin D and cathepsin E.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrett AJ (1977) Cathepsin D and other carboxyl proteinases. Proteinases in Mammalian Cells and Tissues (Barrett AJ. ed.), pp. 209–248, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bowers WE, Beyer CF and Yago N (1977) Cathepsin D of mouse leukemia L1210 cells, unusual intracellular localization and biochemical properties. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 497: 272–279.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Erickson AH (1989) Biosynthesis of lysosomal endopeptidases J. Cell. Biochem. 40: 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fehr K, Lospalluto J and Ziff M (1970) Degradation of immunoglobulin G by lysosomal acid proteases J. Immunol. 105: 973–983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fehr K and Lospalluto J (1971) Exposure of hidden antigenic determinants in human IgG by digestion with spleen proteases. J. Immunol. 107: 814–821.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fehr K, Velvart M, Rauber M, Knopfel M, Baici A, Salgam P and Böni A (1981) Production of agglutinators and rheumatoid factors in plasma cells of rheumatoid and non-rheumatoid synovial tissues. Arth. Rheum. 24: 510–519.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Flickinger MC, Goebel NK and Bohn MA (1989) Determination of specific monoclonal antibody secretion rate during very slow hybridoma growth. Bioprocess Eng. (In press).

  8. Ghetie V and Mihaescu S (1973) The hydrolysis of rabbit immunoglobulin G with purified cathepsins D and E. Immunochemistry 10: 251–255.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kruse PF and Patterson MK (1973) Tissue Culture: Methods and Applications, pp. 406–408. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lapresle C and Webb T (1962) The purification and properties of a proteolytic enzyme, rabbit cathepsin E, and further studies on rabbit cathepsin D. Biochem. J. 84: 455–462.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee SM Gustafson ME, Pickle DJ, Flickinger MC, Muschik GM and Morgran AC (1986) Large scale purification of a murine antimelanoma monoclonal antibody. J. Biotechnol. 4: 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morgan AC, Galloway DR and Reisfeld RA (1981) Production and characterization of monoclonal antibody to a melanoma specific glycoprotein. Hybridoma 1: 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rudge J, Desai MA, Shojaosadaty SA and Lyddiatt A (1987) Continuous culture of murine hybridomas with integrated recovery of monoclonal antibodies. Modern Approaches to Animal Cell Technology, R.E.Spier, J.B.Griffiths (eds.) pp. 556–574. Butterworths, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schlaeger EJ, Eggimann B and Gast A (1987) Proteolytic activity in the culture supernatants of mouse hybridoma cells. Develop. Biol. Standard. 66: 403–408.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sears DW, Kazin AR, Mohrer J, Friedman F and Beychok S (1977) Acquisition of the covalent quaternary structure of an immunoglobulin G molecule. Reoxidative assembly in vitro. Biochemistry 16: 2016–2025.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Seaver SS, Rudolph JL and Gabriels JE (1984) A rapid HPLC technique for monitoring amino acid utilization in animal cell culture. Biotechniques 254–260.

  17. Spiegelberg HL and Weigle WO (1965) The catabolism of homologous and heterologous 7 S gamma globulin fragments. J. Exp. Med. 121: 323–238.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spier RE and Griffiths JB (1988) Animal Cell Biotechnology, Vol. 3, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stefanovic J, Webb T and Lapresle C (1962) Etude des cathepsines D et E dans des preparations de polynucleaires, de macrophages, et de lymphocytes de lapin. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 103: 276–284.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Takahashi T and Tang J (1981) Cathepsin D from porcine and bovine spleen. Meth. Enzymol. 80: 565–567.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Talbot BG, Maclein SJ and Gibson DM (1985) Monoclonal hybridoma screening by analysis of immunoglobulin light chains. J. Immunol. Meth. 79: 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yago N and Bowers WE (1975) Unique cathepsin D-type proteases in rat thoracic duct lymphocytes and in rat lymphoid tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 250: 4749–4754.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yamamoto K, Katsuda N and Kato K (1978) Affinity purification and properties of cathepsin-E-like acid proteinase from rat spleen. Eur. J. Biochem. 92: 499–508.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yonezawa S, Tanaka T and Miyauchi T (1987) Cathepsin E from rat neutrophils: its properties and possible relations to cathepsin D-like and cathepsin E-like acid proteinases, Arch. Bioch. Biophys. 256: 499–508.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A preliminary report of these findings was presented at the 196th National Meeting, American Chemical Society, Los Angeles, September 25–30, 1988; paper #140, Division of Microbial and Biochemical Technology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karl, D.W., Donovan, M. & Flickinger, M.C. A novel acid proteinase relased by hybridoma cells. Cytotechnology 3, 157–169 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143678

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143678

Key words

Navigation