Abstract
A remarkable but little studied aspect of current evolutionary theory is the use by many biologists and philosophers of theological arguments for evolution. These can be classed under two heads: imperfection arguments, in which some organic design is held to be inconsistent with God's perfection and wisdom, and homology arguments, in which some pattern of similarity is held to be inconsistent with God's freedom as an artificer. Evolutionists have long contended that the organic world falls short of what one might expect from an omnipotent and benevolent creator. Yet many of the same scientists who argue theologically for evolution are committed to the philosophical doctrine of methodological naturalism, which maintains that theology has no place in science. Furthermore, the arguments themselves are problematical, employing concepts that cannot perform the work required of them, or resting on unsupported conjectures about suboptimality. Evolutionary theorists should reconsider both the arguments and the influence of Darwinian theological metaphysics on their understanding of evolution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayala, F.: 1988, ‘Evolution, The Theory of’, Encyclopedia Britannica, 15th ed., Encyclopedia Britannica, Chicago.
Brady, R.H.: 1985, ‘On the Independence of Systematics’, Cladistics 1, 113–126.
Brooke, J.H.: 1985, ‘The Relations Between Darwin's Science and his Religion’, in J. Durant (ed.), Darwinism and Divinity, Basil Blackwell, London, pp. 40–75.
Burian, R.: 1986, ‘Why the Panda Provides no Comfort to the Creationist’, Philosopica 37, 11–26.
Cain, A.J.: 1964, ‘The Perfection of Animals’, in J.D. Carthy and C.L. Duddington (eds.), Viewpoints in Biology, Vol. 3, Butterworths, London, pp. 36–63.
Cornell, J.: 1987, ‘God's Magnificent Law: The Bad Influence of Theistic Metaphysics on Darwin's Estimation of Natural Selection’, Journal of the History of Biology 20, 381–412.
Darnbrough, C.: 1986, ‘Genes — Created but Evolving’, in E.H. Andrews, W. Gitt, and W.J. Ouweneel (eds.), Concepts in Creationism, Evangelical Press, Herts, England, pp. 241–266.
Darwin, C.: 1859 [1964], On the Origin of Species, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Darwin, C.: 1877 [1984], The Various Contrivances by Which Orchids Are Fertilized by Insects, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Dawkins, R.: 1986, The Blind Watchmaker, W.W. Norton, New York.
Eldredge, N. and J. Cracraft.: 1980, Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.
Frair, W. and Davis, P.: 1983, A Case for Creation, Moody Press, Chicago.
Futuyma, D.: 1983, Science on Trial, Pantheon, New York.
Futuyma, D.: 1985, ‘Evolution as Fact and Theory’, Bios 56, 3–13.
Ghiselin, M.: 1984, The Triumph of the Darwinian Method, 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Gilkey, L.: 1985, Creationism on Trial, Winston Press, Minneapolis.
Gillespie, N.: 1979, Charles Darwin and the Problem of Creation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Gould, S.J.: 1977, Ever Since Darwin, W.W. Norton, New York.
Gould, S.J.: 1980, The Panda's Thumb, W.W. Norton, New York.
Gould, S.J.: 1983, Hen's Teeth and Horse's Toes, W.W. Norton, New York.
Gould, S.J.: 1986, ‘Evolution and the Triump of Homology, or Why History Matters’, American Scientist 74, 60–69.
Gould, S.J.: 1989, Wonderful Life, W.W. Norton, New York.
Gould, S.J.: 1991, Bully for Brontosaurus, W.W. Norton, New York.
Haeckel, E.: 1876, The History of Creation, D. Appleton, New York.
Hick, J.: 1967, ‘Evil, The Problem of,’ in P. Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Hoffman, A.: 1989, Arguments on Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Holton, G.: 1993, Science and Anti-Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Jacob, F.: 1982, The Possible and the Actual, Pantheon, New York.
Jukes, T. and Osawa, S.: 1991, ‘Recent Evidence for Evolution of the Genetic Code’, in S. Osawa and T. Honjo (eds.), Evolution of Life, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 79–95.
Junker, R. and Scherer, S.: 1988, Entstehung und Geschichte der Lebewesen, Weyel Lehrmittelverlag, Giessen.
Kohn, D.: 1989, ‘Darwin's Ambiguity: The Secularization of Biological Meaning’, British Journal for the History of Science 22, 215–239.
Kolakowski, L.: 1982, Religion, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kitcher, P.: 1985, ‘Darwin's Achievement’, in N. Rescher (ed.), Reason and Rationality in Natural Science, University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland, pp. 127–189.
Landgren, P.: 1993, ‘On the Origin of “Species”: Ideological Roots of the Species Concept’, in S. Scherer (ed.), Typen des Lebens, Pascal Verlag, Berlin, pp. 47–64.
Leibniz, G.W.: [1710] 1985, Theodicy, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois.
Lewontin, R.C.: 1984, ‘Adaptation’, in E. Sober (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 234–251.
Lewontin, R.C.: 1987, ‘The Shape of Optimality’, in J. Dupre (ed.), The Latest on the Best, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 151–159.
Løvtrup, S.: 1987, Darwinism: The Refutation of a Myth, Croom Helm, London.
Maynard Smith, J.: 1978, ‘Optimization Theory in Evolution’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9, 31–56.
Mayr, E.: 1964, Introduction to the facsimile reprint of On the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Mayr, E.: 1983, ‘Darwin, Intellectual Revolutionary’, in D.S. Bendall (ed.), Evolution from Molecules to Men, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 23–41.
Mayr, E.: 1991, One Long Argument, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Murris, H.: 1986, ‘The Concept of the Species and its Formation’, in E.H. Andrews, W. Gitt and W.J. Ouweneel (eds.), Concepts in Creationism, Evangelical Press, Herts, England, pp. 175–207.
Naylor, B.G.: 1982, ‘Vestigial Organs are Evidence of Evolution’, Evolutionary Theory 6, 91–96.
Ospovat, D.: 1980, ‘God and Natural Selection: The Darwinian Idea of Design’, Journal of the History of Biology, 13, 169–194.
Owen, R.: 1849, On the Nature of Limbs, John Van Voorst, London.
Ridley, M.: 1985, The Problems of Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Ridley, M.: 1986, Evolution and Classification, Longman, London.
Rieppel, O.: 1988, Fundamentals of Comparative Biology, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel.
Russell, E.S.: [1916] 1982, Form and Function, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Scadding, S.: 1981, ‘Do ‘Vestigial Organs’ Provide Evidence for Evolution?’, Evolutionary Theory 5, 173–176.
Scadding, S.: 1982,‘Vestigial Organs do not Provide Scientific Evidence for Evolution’, Evolutionary Theory 6, 171–173.
Schaller, G., Jinchu, H., Wenshi, P., and Jing, Z.: 1986, The Giant Pandas of Wolong, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Scherer, S.: 1993, ‘Basic Types of Life’, in S. Scherer (ed.), Typen des Lebens, Pascal Verlag, Berlin, pp. 11–30.
Sober, E.: 1984, The Nature of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Sober, E.: 1993, Philosophy of Biology, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.
Williams, G.C.: 1992, Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, and Challenges, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nelson, P.A. The role of theology in current evolutionary reasoning. Biol Philos 11, 493–517 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138329
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138329