Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 493–517 | Cite as

The role of theology in current evolutionary reasoning

  • Paul A. Nelson
Article

Abstract

A remarkable but little studied aspect of current evolutionary theory is the use by many biologists and philosophers of theological arguments for evolution. These can be classed under two heads: imperfection arguments, in which some organic design is held to be inconsistent with God's perfection and wisdom, and homology arguments, in which some pattern of similarity is held to be inconsistent with God's freedom as an artificer. Evolutionists have long contended that the organic world falls short of what one might expect from an omnipotent and benevolent creator. Yet many of the same scientists who argue theologically for evolution are committed to the philosophical doctrine of methodological naturalism, which maintains that theology has no place in science. Furthermore, the arguments themselves are problematical, employing concepts that cannot perform the work required of them, or resting on unsupported conjectures about suboptimality. Evolutionary theorists should reconsider both the arguments and the influence of Darwinian theological metaphysics on their understanding of evolution.

Key words

natural theology imperfection suboptimality homology methodological naturalism creationism panda's thumb pentadactyl limb Stephen Jay Gould Darwin's theology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayala, F.: 1988, ‘Evolution, The Theory of’, Encyclopedia Britannica, 15th ed., Encyclopedia Britannica, Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Brady, R.H.: 1985, ‘On the Independence of Systematics’, Cladistics 1, 113–126.Google Scholar
  3. Brooke, J.H.: 1985, ‘The Relations Between Darwin's Science and his Religion’, in J. Durant (ed.), Darwinism and Divinity, Basil Blackwell, London, pp. 40–75.Google Scholar
  4. Burian, R.: 1986, ‘Why the Panda Provides no Comfort to the Creationist’, Philosopica 37, 11–26.Google Scholar
  5. Cain, A.J.: 1964, ‘The Perfection of Animals’, in J.D. Carthy and C.L. Duddington (eds.), Viewpoints in Biology, Vol. 3, Butterworths, London, pp. 36–63.Google Scholar
  6. Cornell, J.: 1987, ‘God's Magnificent Law: The Bad Influence of Theistic Metaphysics on Darwin's Estimation of Natural Selection’, Journal of the History of Biology 20, 381–412.Google Scholar
  7. Darnbrough, C.: 1986, ‘Genes — Created but Evolving’, in E.H. Andrews, W. Gitt, and W.J. Ouweneel (eds.), Concepts in Creationism, Evangelical Press, Herts, England, pp. 241–266.Google Scholar
  8. Darwin, C.: 1859 [1964], On the Origin of Species, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  9. Darwin, C.: 1877 [1984], The Various Contrivances by Which Orchids Are Fertilized by Insects, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Dawkins, R.: 1986, The Blind Watchmaker, W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Eldredge, N. and J. Cracraft.: 1980, Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Frair, W. and Davis, P.: 1983, A Case for Creation, Moody Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Futuyma, D.: 1983, Science on Trial, Pantheon, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Futuyma, D.: 1985, ‘Evolution as Fact and Theory’, Bios 56, 3–13.Google Scholar
  15. Ghiselin, M.: 1984, The Triumph of the Darwinian Method, 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Gilkey, L.: 1985, Creationism on Trial, Winston Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  17. Gillespie, N.: 1979, Charles Darwin and the Problem of Creation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  18. Gould, S.J.: 1977, Ever Since Darwin, W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Gould, S.J.: 1980, The Panda's Thumb, W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Gould, S.J.: 1983, Hen's Teeth and Horse's Toes, W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Gould, S.J.: 1986, ‘Evolution and the Triump of Homology, or Why History Matters’, American Scientist 74, 60–69.Google Scholar
  22. Gould, S.J.: 1989, Wonderful Life, W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Gould, S.J.: 1991, Bully for Brontosaurus, W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Haeckel, E.: 1876, The History of Creation, D. Appleton, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Hick, J.: 1967, ‘Evil, The Problem of,’ in P. Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  26. Hoffman, A.: 1989, Arguments on Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  27. Holton, G.: 1993, Science and Anti-Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  28. Jacob, F.: 1982, The Possible and the Actual, Pantheon, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Jukes, T. and Osawa, S.: 1991, ‘Recent Evidence for Evolution of the Genetic Code’, in S. Osawa and T. Honjo (eds.), Evolution of Life, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 79–95.Google Scholar
  30. Junker, R. and Scherer, S.: 1988, Entstehung und Geschichte der Lebewesen, Weyel Lehrmittelverlag, Giessen.Google Scholar
  31. Kohn, D.: 1989, ‘Darwin's Ambiguity: The Secularization of Biological Meaning’, British Journal for the History of Science 22, 215–239.Google Scholar
  32. Kolakowski, L.: 1982, Religion, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  33. Kitcher, P.: 1985, ‘Darwin's Achievement’, in N. Rescher (ed.), Reason and Rationality in Natural Science, University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland, pp. 127–189.Google Scholar
  34. Landgren, P.: 1993, ‘On the Origin of “Species”: Ideological Roots of the Species Concept’, in S. Scherer (ed.), Typen des Lebens, Pascal Verlag, Berlin, pp. 47–64.Google Scholar
  35. Leibniz, G.W.: [1710] 1985, Theodicy, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois.Google Scholar
  36. Lewontin, R.C.: 1984, ‘Adaptation’, in E. Sober (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 234–251.Google Scholar
  37. Lewontin, R.C.: 1987, ‘The Shape of Optimality’, in J. Dupre (ed.), The Latest on the Best, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 151–159.Google Scholar
  38. Løvtrup, S.: 1987, Darwinism: The Refutation of a Myth, Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  39. Maynard Smith, J.: 1978, ‘Optimization Theory in Evolution’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9, 31–56.Google Scholar
  40. Mayr, E.: 1964, Introduction to the facsimile reprint of On the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  41. Mayr, E.: 1983, ‘Darwin, Intellectual Revolutionary’, in D.S. Bendall (ed.), Evolution from Molecules to Men, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 23–41.Google Scholar
  42. Mayr, E.: 1991, One Long Argument, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  43. Murris, H.: 1986, ‘The Concept of the Species and its Formation’, in E.H. Andrews, W. Gitt and W.J. Ouweneel (eds.), Concepts in Creationism, Evangelical Press, Herts, England, pp. 175–207.Google Scholar
  44. Naylor, B.G.: 1982, ‘Vestigial Organs are Evidence of Evolution’, Evolutionary Theory 6, 91–96.Google Scholar
  45. Ospovat, D.: 1980, ‘God and Natural Selection: The Darwinian Idea of Design’, Journal of the History of Biology, 13, 169–194.Google Scholar
  46. Owen, R.: 1849, On the Nature of Limbs, John Van Voorst, London.Google Scholar
  47. Ridley, M.: 1985, The Problems of Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  48. Ridley, M.: 1986, Evolution and Classification, Longman, London.Google Scholar
  49. Rieppel, O.: 1988, Fundamentals of Comparative Biology, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel.Google Scholar
  50. Russell, E.S.: [1916] 1982, Form and Function, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  51. Scadding, S.: 1981, ‘Do ‘Vestigial Organs’ Provide Evidence for Evolution?’, Evolutionary Theory 5, 173–176.Google Scholar
  52. Scadding, S.: 1982,‘Vestigial Organs do not Provide Scientific Evidence for Evolution’, Evolutionary Theory 6, 171–173.Google Scholar
  53. Schaller, G., Jinchu, H., Wenshi, P., and Jing, Z.: 1986, The Giant Pandas of Wolong, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  54. Scherer, S.: 1993, ‘Basic Types of Life’, in S. Scherer (ed.), Typen des Lebens, Pascal Verlag, Berlin, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar
  55. Sober, E.: 1984, The Nature of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  56. Sober, E.: 1993, Philosophy of Biology, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  57. Williams, G.C.: 1992, Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, and Challenges, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul A. Nelson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of ChicagoChicagoU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations