Summary
Thee groups consisting of 332, 243 and 280 barley breeding lines (entries) of known selection history were evaluated in 10, 9 and 8 environments, respectively, to determine the relationship between grain yield in low yielding (LYE) or high yielding (HYE) environment, and selection history and type of germplasm. One cycle of selection in LYE produced on average five times more entries outyielding the best check in LYE than selection in HYE. A retrospective analysis indicated that the highest yielding lines in LYE were lower yielding (15%–28%) in HYE when compared with the best check, and by 20% and 38% compared with the best entries in HYE. In contrast, the highest yielding lines in HYE were lower yielding (4%–33%) in LYE when compared with the best check, and by 33% and 40% when compared with the best entries in LYE. The highest yielding lines in LYE did not differ consistently from the highest yielding lines in HYE for a number of morphological and developmental traits including days to heading. This suggests there are many paths to high yield in LYE and that analytical breeding based on individual traits may not be appropriate for variable environments. Only 0.07% of the highest yielding entries in LYE was selected for high yield in HYE conditions confirming previous results indicating that selection for high yield in HYE is an inefficient strategy for improving yield in low yielding conditions. This frequency is 28 times lower than the frequency of high yielding entries in LYE selected from landraces or crosses with landraces in low yielding conditions. The results imply that the most cost-effective strategy for barley breeding in low yielding conditions is to select repeatedly in low yielding conditions and to include adapted germplasm (landraces) in the breeding material.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acevedo, E., P.Q., Craufurd, R.B., Austin & P., Perez-Marco, 1991. Traits associated with high yield in barley in low-rainfall environments. J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 116: 23–36.
Allen, F.L., R.E., Comstock & D.C., Rasmusson, 1978. Optimal environment for yield testing. Crop Sci. 18: 747–751.
Atlin, G.N. & K.J., Frey, 1989a. Predicting the relative effectiveness of direct versus indirect selection for oat yield in three types of stress environments. Euphytica 44: 137–142.
Atlin, G.N. & K.J., Frey, 1989b. Breeding crop varieties for low-input agriculture. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 4: 53–58.
Atlin, G.N. & K.J., Frey, 1990. Selecting oat lines for yield in low-productivity environments. Crop Sci. 30: 556–561.
Bidinger, F.R., V., Mahalakshmi & G.D.P., Rao, 1987a. Assessment of drought resistance in Pearl Millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke). I. Factors affecting yields under stress. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 38: 37–48.
Bidinger, F.R., V., Mahalakshmi & G.D.P., Rao, 1987b. Assessment of drought resistance in Pearl Millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke). II. Estimation of genotype response to stress. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 38: 49–59.
Blum, A., 1988. Plant breeding for stress environments. CRC Press, Inc., Florida.
Ceccarelli, S., 1989. Wide adaptation: How wide? Euphytica 40: 197–205.
Ceccarelli, S., S., Grando & J.A.G., van, Leur, 1987a. Genetic diversity in barley landraces from Syria and Jordan. Euphytica 36: 389–405.
Ceccarelli, S., M., Nachit, G.O., Ferrara, M.S., Mekni, M., Tahir, J.A.G., van, Leur & J.P., Srivastava, 1987b. Breeding strategies for improving cereal yield and stability under drought. In: J.P., Srivastava, E., Porceddu, E., Acevedo & S., Varma (Eds). ‘Drought tolerance in winter cereals’. pp. 101–114. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Ceccarelli, S. & S., Grando, 1989. Efficiency of empirical selection under stress conditions in barley. J. Genet. and Breed. 43: 25–31.
Ceccarelli, S., E., Acevedo & S., Grando, 1991. Breeding for yield stability in unpredictable environments: single traits, interaction between traits, and architecture of genotypes. Euphytica 56: 169–185.
Cochran, W.G., 1964. Quoted by G.W. Snedecor & W.G. Cochran, 1967. Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press.
Cooper, P.J.M., P.J., Gregory, D., Tully & H.C., Harris, 1987. Improving water use efficiency of annual crops in the rainfed farming systems of West Asia and North Africa. Expl. Agriculture 23: 113–158.
Falconer, D.S., 1960. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Ronald Press, New York.
Falconer, D.S., 1990. Selection in different environments: effects on environmental sensitivity (reaction norm) and on mean performance. Genet. Res. Camb. 56: 57–70.
Fisher, R.A. & J.R., Wood, 1979. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. III. Yield associations with morpho-physiological traits. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 30: 1001–1020.
Hsiao, T.C., 1982. The soil-plant-atmosphere continuum in relation to drought and crop production. In: ‘Drought Resistance in Crops with Emphasis on Rice’. IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines, pp. 39–52.
Hurd, E.A., 1971. Can we breed for drought resistance? In: Larson, K.L. & Eastin, J.D. (Eds). ‘Drought injury and resistance in crops’ Spec. Publ. N. 2, Crop Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 77–88.
Lawn, R.J., 1988. Breeding for improved plant performance in drought-prone environments. In: F.R., Bidinger & C., Johansen (Eds). ‘Drought Research Priorities for the Dryland Tropics’ ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, pp. 213–219.
Lin, C.S. & G., Poushinsky, 1983. A modified augmented design for an early stage of plant selection involving a large number of test lines without replications. Biometrics 39: 553–561.
Keim, D.L. & W.E., Kronstad, 1979. Drought resistance and dryland adaptation in winter wheat. Crop Sci. 19: 574–576.
Nageswara Rao, R.C., J.H., Williams, & Murari, Singh, 1989. Genotypic sensitivity to drought and yield potential of Peanut. Agron. J. 81: 887–893.
Rosielle, A.A. & J., Hamblin, 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Sci. 21: 943–946.
Simmonds, N.W., 1984. Decentralized selection. Sugar Cane 6: 8–10.
Snedecor, G.W. & W.G. Cochran, 1967. Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press.
Whitehead, W.L. & F.L., Allen, 1990. High-vs. low-stress yield test environments for selecting superior soybean lines. Crop Sci. 30: 912–918.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ceccarelli, S., Grando, S. Environment of selection and type of germplasm in barley breeding for low-yielding conditions. Euphytica 57, 207–219 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039667
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039667