Skip to main content
Log in

Sugar-beet seed steep treatments to improve germination under cold, wet conditions

  • Published:
Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modifying the present commercial sugar-beet steep treatment (12h in 0.2% thiram suspension, 25°C) to include an initial 2h steep in 0.3M hydrochloric acid, decreased fruit weight and cortex density and improved the performance of the inherently slower part of the population under cold, wet conditions. Adding gibberellins (GA4/7) or an N-substituted phthalimide (AC 94377) to the thiram steep was also beneficial whereas kinetin of N6-benzyladenine gave no improvement. Germination was even more rapid and better synchronised following a 4-day seed advancement sequence, particularly when this started with the acid steep. Overall, it was possible to increase the proportion of seeds which gave a root or produced hypocotyls at least 2cm tall by 9% and 14% respectively; the thermal time needed for the 90th seed to germinate was reduced from 73 to 30 day degrees and synchrony could be improved at least two-fold.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akeson WR, Freytag AH and Henson MA (1981) Improvement of sugar beet seed emergence with dilute acid and growth regulator treatments. Crop Sci 21, 307–312

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akeson WR, Henson MA, Freytag AH and Westfall DG (1980) Sugarbeet fruit germination and emergence under moisture and temperature stress. Crop Sci 20, 735–739

    Google Scholar 

  3. Durrant MJ and Gummerson RJ (1990) Factors associated with germination of sugar-beet seed in the standard test and establishment in the field. Seed Sci & Technol 18, 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Durrant MJ and Jaggard KW (1988) Sugar-beet seed advancement to increase establishment and decrease bolting. J agric Sci Camb 110, 367–374

    Google Scholar 

  5. Durrant MJ and Loads AH (1987) Experiments to determine the optimum advancement of sugar-beet seed. Seed Sci & Technol 15, 185–196

    Google Scholar 

  6. Durrant MJ and Mash SJ (1989) Simulation of sugar-beet hypocotyl extension with potassium nitrate. Ann appl Biol 115, 367–374

    Google Scholar 

  7. Durrant MJ and Mash SJ (1990) The use of a specific gravity table or an aspirator in sugar-beet seed processing. II. To increase vigour and synchrony of germination. Seed Sci & Technol 18, 171–177

    Google Scholar 

  8. Durrant MJ, Payne PA and McLaren JS (1983) The use of water and some inorganic salt solutions to advance sugar-beet seed. Ann appl Biol 103, 507–526

    Google Scholar 

  9. Durrant MJ, Payne PA, Prince JWF and Fletcher R (1988) Thiram steep seed treatment to control Phoma betae and improve the establishment of the sugar-beet plant stand. Crop Protection 7, 319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gott KA and Thomas TH (1986) Comparative effects of gibberellins and an N- substituted phthalimide on seed germination and extension growth of celery (Apium graveolens L.). Plant Growth Regulation 4, 273–279

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gummerson RJ (1986) The effect of constant temperature and osmotic potentials on the germination of sugar beet. J Exp Bot 37, 729–741

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hibbert D and Woodwark W (1969) Germinating testing of sugar-beet seed on different types of paper substrate. J int Inst Sugar Beet Res 4, 169–174

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kimber D and McCullagh S (1988) Report of the 1987 NIAB Variety trials. Br Sugar Beet Rev 56(2), 5–8

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maude RB, Vizor AS and Shuring CG (1969) The control of fungal seed-borne diseases by means of a thiram seed soak. Ann appl Biol 64, 245–257

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nelson JM, Jenkins A and Sharples GC (1984) Soaking and other seed pretreatment effects on germination and emergence of sugarbeets at high temperature. J Seed Technol 9, 79–86

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nelson JM and Sharples GC (1980) Stimulation of tomato, pepper and sugarbeet germination at low temperatures by growth regulators. J Seed Technol 5, 62–68

    Google Scholar 

  17. Peto FH (1964) Methods of loosening tight seed caps in monogerm seed to improve germination. J Amer Soc Sugar Beet Technol 13, 279–286

    Google Scholar 

  18. Santos DSB and Pereira MFA (1989) Restrictions of the tegument to the germination of Beta vulgaris L. seeds. Seed Sci & Technol 17, 601–611

    Google Scholar 

  19. Scott RK, Wood DW and Harper F (1972) Plant growth regulators as a pretreatment for sugar-beet seeds. Proc Br Weed Control Conf 2, 752–759

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Durrant, M.J., Mash, S.J. Sugar-beet seed steep treatments to improve germination under cold, wet conditions. Plant Growth Regul 10, 45–55 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035130

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035130

Key words

Navigation