Abstract
Understanding how growth and development of durum wheat cultivars respond to drought could provide a basis to develop crop improvement programmes in drought-affected tropical and subtropical countries. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to study the responses of five durum wheat cultivars to moisture stress at different developmental phases. Phenology, total dry matter (TDM), relative growth rate (RGR), leaf area ratio (LAR), net assimilation rate (NAR), leaf weight ratio (LWR), specific leaf area (SLA) and shoot:root ratio were compared. Pre-anthesis moisture stress delayed phenological development, whereas post-anthesis moisture stress accelerated it. TDM accumulation rate was different between drought-resistant and susceptible cultivars. RGR and its components changed with age and moisture availability. Drought-resistant cultivars had a high RGR in favourable periods of the growing season and a low RGR during moisture stress. In contrast, the drought-susceptible cultivar (Po) showed an opposite trend. LAR explained the differences in RGR (r=0.788) best, whereas the relationship between NAR and RGR was not significant. Even though both LWR and SLA were important factors determining the potential growth rate, LWR was of major importance to describe cultivar differences in LAR, and consequently in RGR. The drought-resistant cultivars Omrabi-5 and Boohai showed vigorous root development and/or a low shoot:root ratio. It is concluded that biomass allocation is the major factor explaining variation in RGR among the investigated durum wheat cultivars.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angus, J F and Moncur, M W 1977 Water stress and phenology in wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 28, 177–181.
Blum, A, Ramaiah, S, Kanemasu, E T and Paulsen, G M 1990. Wheat recovery from drought stress at the tillering stage of development. Field Crops Res. 24, 67–85.
Chapin, F S 1980 The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 11, 233–260.
Dijkstra, P and Lambers, H 1989 A physiological analysis of genetic variation in relative growth within Plantago major L. Funct. Ecol. 3, 577–587.
Donatelli, M, Hammer, G L and Vanderlip, R L 1992 Genotype and water limitation effects on phenology, growth and transpiration efficiency in grain sorghum. Crop Sci. 32, 781–786.
Fischer, R A and Maurer, R 1978 Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 29, 897–912.
Hunt R 1982 Plant Growth Curves. The Functional Approach to Growth Analysis. Edward Arnold London. 248 p.
Karimi, M and Siddique, H M 1991 Crop growth and relative growth rates of old and modern wheat cultivars. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 42, 13–20.
Konings, H 1989 Physiological and morphological differences between plants with high NAR or high LAR as related to environmental conditions. In Causes and Consequences of Variation in Growth Rate and Productivity of higher Plants. Eds. HLambers, M LCambridge, HKonings and T LPons. pp 101–123. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.
Lambers, H and Dijkstra, P 1987 A physiological analysis of genotypic variation in relative growth rate: can growth rate confer ecological advantage? In Disturbance in Grasslands. Eds. JvanAndel et al., pp 237–252. Junk, Dordrecht.
Lambers, H, Freijsen, N, Poorter, H, Hirose, T and Van derWerf, A 1989 Analysis of growth based on net assimilation rate and nitrogen productivity. Their physiological back-ground. In Causes and Consequences of Variation in Growth Rate and Productivity of higher Plants. Eds. HLambers, M LCambridge, HKonings and T LPons, pp 1–17. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.
Passioura, J B 1977 Grain yield, harvest index and water use of wheat. J. Aust. Inst. of Agric. Sci. 43, 117–120.
Poorter, H 1989 Interspecific variation in relative growth rate: on ecological causes and physiological consequences. In Causes and Consequences of Variation in Growth Rate and Productivity of higher Plants. Eds. HLambers, M LCambridge, HKonings and T LPons, pp 45–68. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.
Poorter, H and Lambers, H 1986 Growth and competitive ability of a higher plastic and marginally plastic genotype of Plantago major L. in fluctuating environment. Physiol. Plant. 67, 217–222.
Poorter, H and Remkes, C 1990 Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Oecologia 83, 553–559.
Simane B and Struik P C 1993 Agroclimatic analysis: a tool for planning sustainable durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var. durum) production in Ethiopia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. (In press).
VanAndel, J and Jager, J C 1981 Analysis of growth and nutrition of six plant species of woodland clearings. J. Ecol. 69, 871–882.
Watson, D J 1952. The physiological basis of variation in yield. Adv. Agron. Vol. IV, 101–145.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simane, B., Peacock, J.M. & Struik, P.C. Differences in developmental plasticity and growth rate among drought-resistant and susceptible cultivars of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum). Plant Soil 157, 155–166 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011044
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011044