Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in developmental plasticity and growth rate among drought-resistant and susceptible cultivars of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding how growth and development of durum wheat cultivars respond to drought could provide a basis to develop crop improvement programmes in drought-affected tropical and subtropical countries. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to study the responses of five durum wheat cultivars to moisture stress at different developmental phases. Phenology, total dry matter (TDM), relative growth rate (RGR), leaf area ratio (LAR), net assimilation rate (NAR), leaf weight ratio (LWR), specific leaf area (SLA) and shoot:root ratio were compared. Pre-anthesis moisture stress delayed phenological development, whereas post-anthesis moisture stress accelerated it. TDM accumulation rate was different between drought-resistant and susceptible cultivars. RGR and its components changed with age and moisture availability. Drought-resistant cultivars had a high RGR in favourable periods of the growing season and a low RGR during moisture stress. In contrast, the drought-susceptible cultivar (Po) showed an opposite trend. LAR explained the differences in RGR (r=0.788) best, whereas the relationship between NAR and RGR was not significant. Even though both LWR and SLA were important factors determining the potential growth rate, LWR was of major importance to describe cultivar differences in LAR, and consequently in RGR. The drought-resistant cultivars Omrabi-5 and Boohai showed vigorous root development and/or a low shoot:root ratio. It is concluded that biomass allocation is the major factor explaining variation in RGR among the investigated durum wheat cultivars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angus, J F and Moncur, M W 1977 Water stress and phenology in wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 28, 177–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A, Ramaiah, S, Kanemasu, E T and Paulsen, G M 1990. Wheat recovery from drought stress at the tillering stage of development. Field Crops Res. 24, 67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, F S 1980 The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Sys. 11, 233–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, P and Lambers, H 1989 A physiological analysis of genetic variation in relative growth within Plantago major L. Funct. Ecol. 3, 577–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donatelli, M, Hammer, G L and Vanderlip, R L 1992 Genotype and water limitation effects on phenology, growth and transpiration efficiency in grain sorghum. Crop Sci. 32, 781–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R A and Maurer, R 1978 Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 29, 897–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt R 1982 Plant Growth Curves. The Functional Approach to Growth Analysis. Edward Arnold London. 248 p.

  • Karimi, M and Siddique, H M 1991 Crop growth and relative growth rates of old and modern wheat cultivars. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 42, 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konings, H 1989 Physiological and morphological differences between plants with high NAR or high LAR as related to environmental conditions. In Causes and Consequences of Variation in Growth Rate and Productivity of higher Plants. Eds. HLambers, M LCambridge, HKonings and T LPons. pp 101–123. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambers, H and Dijkstra, P 1987 A physiological analysis of genotypic variation in relative growth rate: can growth rate confer ecological advantage? In Disturbance in Grasslands. Eds. JvanAndel et al., pp 237–252. Junk, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambers, H, Freijsen, N, Poorter, H, Hirose, T and Van derWerf, A 1989 Analysis of growth based on net assimilation rate and nitrogen productivity. Their physiological back-ground. In Causes and Consequences of Variation in Growth Rate and Productivity of higher Plants. Eds. HLambers, M LCambridge, HKonings and T LPons, pp 1–17. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passioura, J B 1977 Grain yield, harvest index and water use of wheat. J. Aust. Inst. of Agric. Sci. 43, 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorter, H 1989 Interspecific variation in relative growth rate: on ecological causes and physiological consequences. In Causes and Consequences of Variation in Growth Rate and Productivity of higher Plants. Eds. HLambers, M LCambridge, HKonings and T LPons, pp 45–68. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorter, H and Lambers, H 1986 Growth and competitive ability of a higher plastic and marginally plastic genotype of Plantago major L. in fluctuating environment. Physiol. Plant. 67, 217–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poorter, H and Remkes, C 1990 Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Oecologia 83, 553–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simane B and Struik P C 1993 Agroclimatic analysis: a tool for planning sustainable durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var. durum) production in Ethiopia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. (In press).

  • VanAndel, J and Jager, J C 1981 Analysis of growth and nutrition of six plant species of woodland clearings. J. Ecol. 69, 871–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D J 1952. The physiological basis of variation in yield. Adv. Agron. Vol. IV, 101–145.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simane, B., Peacock, J.M. & Struik, P.C. Differences in developmental plasticity and growth rate among drought-resistant and susceptible cultivars of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum). Plant Soil 157, 155–166 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011044

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011044

Key words

Navigation