Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 78, Issue 2, pp 183–188 | Cite as

An assessment of biological interactions in an epilithic stream community using time-lapse cinematography

  • Michael J. Wiley
  • Steven L. Kohler
Article

Abstract

In situ time-lapse cinematography was used to record and enumerate behavioral interactions between members of an epilithic insect community in a small Michigan (U.S.A.)trout stream. 145 interactions were observed during 78 hours of filming. Most of these (98%) involved simuliid larvae. Interactions between simuliid larvae occurred at about the same frequency as interactions between simuliids and other taxa. However, interactions between simuliid larvae were less likely to lead to emigration than were interactions between blackflies and other groups. Significant short-term fluctuations of faunal density on filmed surfaces were also observed. The causes of these fluctuations appeared varied. The results of a preliminary assessment of interactions and the usefulness of this technique are discussed.

Keywords

behavioral interactions new technique time-lapse cinematography Simuliidae stream fauna standing crop competition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brinkhurst, R. O. 1974. The benthos of lakes. St. Marin's Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cantrell, M. A. & McLachlan, A J. 1977. Competition and chironomid distribution patterns in a newly flooded lake, Oikos 29: 429–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Colbo, M. H. 1979. Distribution of winter-developing Simuliidae (Diptera) in Eastern Newfoundland. Can. J. Zool. 57: 2143–2152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Curry, L. V. L. 1954 Notes on the ecology of the midge fauna (Diptera: Tendipedidae) of Hunt Creek, Montmorency County, Michigan. Ecology 35: 541–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elliott, J. M. 1968. The daily activity patterns of mayfly nymphs (Ephemeroptera). J. Zool. 155: 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elliott, J. M. 1971. Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates. Scient. Publ. Freshwater Biol. Assoc., No. 25.Google Scholar
  7. Gersabeck, Jr., E. F. & Merritt, R. W. 1979. The effect of physical factors on the colonization and relocation behavior of immature blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae). Environ. Entomol. 8: 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hynes, H. B. N. & Williams, W. D. 1965. Experiments on competition between two Asellus species (Isopoda, Crustacea).Google Scholar
  9. Hynes, H. B. N. & Williams, W. D. 1965. Experiments on competition between tow Asellus species (Isopoda, Crustacea). Hydrobiologia 26: 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kovalak, W. P. 1978. On the feeding habits of Phasganophora capitata (Plecoptera: Perlidae). Great Lakes Entomol. 11: 45–49.Google Scholar
  11. MacArthur, R. H. 1968. The theory of the niche. Pages 159–176 in: R. C. Lewontin (Ed.), Population biology and evolution. Syracuse Univ. Press, Syracuse, N.Y.Google Scholar
  12. McFadden, J., Alexander, G. Shetter, D. 1967. Numerical changes and population regulation in brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 24 (7): 1425–1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McLay, C. L. 1968. A study of drift in the Kahanin River, New Zealand. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 19: 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mokry, J. E. 1975. Studies on the ecology and biology of blackfly larvae utilizing an in situ benthos observatory. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 19: 1546–1549.Google Scholar
  15. Mozley, S. C. 1968. The integrative roles of the chironomid (Diptera: Chironomidae) larvae in the trophic web of a shallow five hectare lake in the Piedmont region of Georgia. Ph. D. Diss., Emory University, Atlanta, 109 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Needham, P. R. & Usinger, R. L. 1956. Variability in the macrofauna of a single riffle in Prosser Creek, California, as indicated by the Surber sampler. Hilgardia 24: 383–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Peckarsky, B. L. 1979. Biological interactions as determinants of distributions of benthic invertebrates within the substrate of stony streams. Limnol. Oceanogr. 24: 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Resh, V. H. 1979. Sampling variability and life history features: basic considerations in the design of aquatic insect studies. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 36: 290–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shapas, T. J. & Hilsenhoff, W. L. 1976. Feeding habits of Wisconsin's predominant lotic Plecoptera, Ephemeroptera, and Trichoptera. Great Lakes Entomol. 9: 175–188.Google Scholar
  20. Stout, J. & Vandermeer, J. 1975. Comparison of species richness for stream inhabiting insects in tropical and mid-latitude streams. Am. Nat. 109: 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Townsend, C. R. & Hildrew, A. G. 1976. Field experiments on the drifting, colonization, and continuous redistribution of stream benthos. J. Anim. Ecol. 45: 759–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Walton, Jr., O. E., Reice, S. R. & Andrews, R. W. 1977. The effects of density, sediment particle size and velocity on drift of Acroneuria abnormis (Plecoptera). Oikos 28: 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wiley, M. J. 1978. The biology of some Michigan trout stream chironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae). Mich. Acad. 11(2): 193–209.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. W. Junk b. v. Publishers 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Wiley
    • 1
  • Steven L. Kohler
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Natural ResourcesUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations