Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Consumer-defined assortments: application of card-sorting to category management

Abstract

Category management theory and practice have traditionally overlooked the role of the consumer in defining category boundaries. Industry-based criteria do not necessarily overlap with the perceptual view of the assortment held, implicitly or explicitly, by consumers. This research aims to propose a methodological approach to derive a customer-oriented shelf layout from customer perceptions of product similarities and to empirically test if adopting such a consumer-oriented shelf layout significantly affects consumers’ in-store perceptions and reactions. In two studies, we show that consumer-based shelf layouts determine higher levels of store satisfaction because of the higher level of fit between product display on the shelves and consumers’ cognitive categorization of the assortment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alba, J. W., & Chattopadhyay, A. (1986). Salience effects in brand recall. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(4), 363–369.

  2. Bauer, J. C., Kotouc, A. J., & Rudolph, T. (2012). What constitutes a “good assortment”? A scale for measuring consumers’ perceptions of an assortment offered in a grocery category. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,19(1), 11–26.

  3. Belk, R. W. (1975). Situational variables and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research,2(3), 157–164.

  4. Blanchard, S. J., & Aloise, D. (2017). Extracting summary piles from sorting task data. Journal of Marketing Research,54(3), 398–414.

  5. Blanchard, S. J., Aloise, D., & DeSarbo, W. S. (2012a). The heterogeneous p-median problem for categorization based clustering. Psychometrika,77(4), 741–762.

  6. Blanchard, S. J., DeSarbo, W. S., Selin Atalay, A., & Harmancioglu, N. (2012b). Identifying consumer heterogeneity in unobserved categories. Marketing Letters,23(1), 177–194.

  7. Briesch, R. A., Chintagunta, P. K., & Fox, E. J. (2009). How does assortment affect grocery store choice? Journal of Marketing Research,46(2), 176–189.

  8. Chandon, P., Wesley Hutchinson, J., Bradlow, E. T., & Young, S. H. (2009). Does in-store marketing work? Effects of the number and position of shelf facings on brand attention and evaluation at the point of purchase. Journal of Marketing,73(6), 1–17.

  9. Cil, I. (2012). Consumption universes based supermarket layout through association rule mining and multidimensional scaling. Expert Systems with Applications,39(10), 8611–8625.

  10. Day, G. S., Shocker, A. D., & Srivastava, R. K. (1979). Customer-oriented approaches to identifying product-markets. Journal of Marketing,43(4), 8–19.

  11. Diehl, K., van Herpen, E., & Lamberton, C. (2015). Organizing products with complements versus substitutes: Effects on store preferences as a function of effort and assortment perceptions. Journal of Retailing,91(1), 1–18.

  12. Dreze, X., Hoch, S. J., & Purk, M. A. (1994). Shelf management and space elasticity. Journal of Retailing, 70(4), 301–326.

  13. Fincher, S., & Tenenberg, J. (2005). Making sense of card sorting data. Expert Systems,22(3), 89–93.

  14. Fitzsimons, G. J. (2000). Consumer response to stockouts. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 249–266.

  15. Garaus, M., Wagner, U., & Kummer, C. (2015). Cognitive fit, retail shopper confusion, and shopping value: Empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research,68(5), 1003–1011.

  16. Geuens, M., Brengman, M., & S’Jegers, R. (2003). Food retailing, now and in the future. A consumer perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,10(4), 241–251.

  17. Hamilton, R. W., Puntoni, S., & Tavassoli, N. T. (2010). Categorization by groups and individuals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112(1), 70–81.

  18. Hoch, S. J., Bradlow, E. T., & Wansink, B. (1999). The variety of an assortment. Marketing Science,18(4), 527–546.

  19. Huffman, C., & Kahn, B. E. (1998). Variety for sale: Mass customization or mass confusion? Journal of Retailing,74(4), 491–513.

  20. Huh, Y. E., Vosgerau, J., & Morewedge, C. K. (2016). More similar but less satisfying: Comparing preferences for and the efficacy of within-and cross-category substitutes for food. Psychological Science,27(6), 894–903.

  21. Inman, J. J., McAlister, L., & Hoyer, W. D. (1990). Promotion signal: Proxy for a price cut? Journal of Consumer Research,17(1), 74–81.

  22. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,79(6), 995–1006.

  23. Kahn, B. E., & Wansink, B. (2004). The influence of assortment structure on perceived variety and consumption quantities. Journal of Consumer Research,30(4), 519–533.

  24. Kim, Y. K., Lee, M. Y., & Park, S. H. (2014). Shopping value orientation: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Business Research,67(1), 2884–2890.

  25. Lamberton, C. P., & Diehl, K. (2013). Retail choice architecture: The effects of benefit-and attribute-based assortment organization on consumer perceptions and choice. Journal of Consumer Research,40(3), 393–411.

  26. Lockshin, L. S., & Innis, D. E. (1993). The role of performance expectations in consumer satisfaction, attitude, and store loyalty for two types of retail outlets. In W. Darden & R. Lusch (Eds.), The symposium on patronage behavior and retail strategic planning (pp. 203–214). Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University.

  27. Mantrala, M. K., Levy, M., Kahn, B. E., Fox, E. J., Gaidarev, P., Dankworth, B., et al. (2009). Why is assortment planning so difficult for retailers? A framework and research agenda. Journal of Retailing,85(1), 71–83.

  28. Mogilner, C., Rudnick, T., & Iyengar, S. S. (2008). The mere categorization effect: how the presence of categories increases choosers’ perceptions of assortment variety and outcome satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research,35(2), 202–215.

  29. Morales, A., Barbara, E. Kahn, McAlister, L., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (2005). Perceptions of assortment variety: The effects of congruency between consumers’ internal and retailers’ external organization. Journal of Retailing,81(2), 159–169.

  30. Needel, S. P. (1998). Understanding consumer response to category management through virtual reality. Journal of Advertising Research,38(4), 61–67.

  31. Piris, Y., & Guibert, N. (2015). Effects of intuitive judgments on consumer assortment evaluations. Journal of Consumer Marketing,32(3), 137–144.

  32. Pizzi, G., & Scarpi, D. (2016). The effect of shelf layout on satisfaction and perceived assortment size: An empirical assessment. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,28(January), 67–77.

  33. Porac, J. F., & Thomas, H. (1990). Taxonomic mental models in competitor definition. Academy of Management Review,15(2), 224–240.

  34. Poynor, C., & Wood, S. (2010). Smart subcategories: How assortment formats influence consumer learning and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research,37(1), 159–175.

  35. Ratneshwar, S., Pechmann, C., & Shocker, A. D. (1996). Goal-derived categories and the antecedents of across-category consideration. Journal of Consumer Research,23(3), 240–250.

  36. Reutskaja, E., Nagel, R., Camerer, C. F., & Rangel, A. (2011). Search dynamics in consumer choice under time pressure: An eye-tracking study. The American Economic Review,101(2), 900–926.

  37. Roggeveen, A. L., Nordfält, J., & Grewal, D. (2016). Do digital displays enhance sales? Role of retail format and message content. Journal of Retailing,92(1), 122–131.

  38. Ross, B. H., & Murphy, G. L. (1999). Food for thought: Cross-classification and category organization in a complex real-world domain. Cognitive Psychology,38(4), 495–553.

  39. Shocker, A. D., Zahorik, A. J., & Stewart, D. W. (1984). Competitive market structure analysis: A comment on problems. Journal of Consumer Research,11(3), 836–841.

  40. Stilley, K. M., Inman, J. J., & Wakefield, K. L. (2010). Planning to make unplanned purchases? The role of in-store slack in budget deviation. Journal of consumer research,37(2), 264–278.

  41. Townsend, C., & Kahn, B. E. (2014). The “visual preference heuristic”: The influence of visual versus verbal depiction on assortment processing, perceived variety, and choice overload. Journal of Consumer Research,40(5), 993–1015.

  42. Valenzuela, A., & Raghubir, P. (2009). Position-based beliefs: The center-stage effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology,19(2), 185–196.

  43. Valenzuela, A., Raghubir, P., & Mitakakis, C. (2013). Shelf space schemas: Myth or reality? Journal of Business Research,66(7), 881–888.

  44. Van Herpen, E., & Pieters, R. (2002). The variety of an assortment: An extension to the attribute-based approach. Marketing Science,21(3), 331–341.

  45. Van Nierop, E., Fok, D., & Franses, P. H. (2008). Interaction between shelf layout and marketing effectiveness and its impact on optimizing shelf arrangements. Marketing Science,27(6), 1065–1082.

  46. Vazquez, D., Bruce, M., & Studd, R. (2003). A case study exploring the packaging design management process within a UK food retailer. British Food Journal,105(9), 602–617.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Gabriele Pizzi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pizzi, G., Marzocchi, G.L. Consumer-defined assortments: application of card-sorting to category management. Ital. J. Mark. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-020-00005-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Card-sorting
  • Category management
  • Assortment
  • Store satisfaction