Advertisement

Effective Antarctic krill oil extraction using switchable hydrophilicity solvents

  • Weiwei Sun
  • Wencan Huang
  • Bowen Shi
  • Changhu Xue
  • Xiaoming JiangEmail author
Research Paper
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Antarctic krill has been widely studied because of its abundant biomass, rich nutritional value, and great production potential. Notably, krill oil (KO) is rich in phospholipids (PLs), polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), and astaxanthin. A method based on a green switchable hydrophilicity solvent N,N-dimethylcyclohexylamine (DMCHA), which can reversibly change from oil soluble to water soluble in the presence of CO2 was used to extract KO from frozen Antarctic krill as it consumes less energy than traditional methods. We showed that DMCHA destroyed the surface structure of Antarctic krill and accelerated the dissolution of KO. In addition, this method enabled the PL extraction to reach up to 80.2% of total PLs, among which PC accounted for the highest proportion, up to 90.91% in PL. In fact, the astaxanthin extraction reached up to 81.44% of total astaxanthin while the fatty acid (FA) extraction up to 84.35%. The KO extracted through DMCHA was rich in PUFA, up to 47.74%, and the content of EPA + DHA reached 42.16% of total FA content. Furthermore, the amount of residual solvent in the lipid phase was just 0.23% of the DMCHA used for the extraction and the recovery rate of solvent was up to 93.2%. Our results demonstrated the high efficiency of oil extraction and the environmental friendliness of this method.

Keywords

Krill oil Switchable hydrophilicity solvents N,N-dimethylcyclohexylamine Phospholipids Polyunsaturated fatty acids Astaxanthin 

Introduction

Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) is considered to be one of the richest biomasses in the world (Auerswald et al. 2015) and is known as a potential alternative source of protein, lipids, as well as chitin (Grantham 1977). Among them, KO has attracted increasing attention because of its unique composition and positive impact on human health. It contains abundant LC-ω-3 PUFAs, such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) (Haider et al. 2017) as well as powerful, naturally-occurring antioxidants, such as astaxanthin (Tou et al. 2007). The PUFAs in KO are easily absorbed into target organs as they are composed of both PLs and triglycerides (TGs), while the EPA and DHA in other supplements like fish oil are mainly in the form of TGs (Schuchardt et al. 2011). Moreover, astaxanthin, has effective antioxidant properties that can easily maintain the stability of PUFAs from oxidative damage (Lee et al. 2015). In addition, as an anti-inflammatory component, astaxanthin has been shown to play an active role in preventing diabetes, cancer, and supporting the immune system (Costanzo et al. 2016).

Supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) and organic solvents are commonly used to extract KO (Bruheim et al. 2015). Though the properties of components in KO, separated via the SC-CO2 method, can be improved in certain cases, high capital costs for improving batch extraction and engineering technology should be considered (Friedrich and Pryde 1984; Gigliotti et al. 2011). By contrast, organic solvents could be used to extract KO containing PLs more simply and economically, without expensive instrumentation (Xie et al. 2017). Acetone, ethanol, isopropanol, ethyl acetate, isohexane, and n-hexane are the traditional organic solvents used for KO extraction. However, these volatile solvents are ineffective to Antarctic krill with high water contents (Cooney et al. 2009) so an air drying step is required for Antarctic krill to obtain the final KO, which consumes energy (Jessop et al. 2010). Moreover, solvent recovery is not easy, and environmental pollution arises due to solvent evaporation and high energy consumption (Boyd et al. 2012a). Therefore, energy-efficient techniques must be developed to extract oil from frozen Antarctic krill.

Switchable solvents are liquids with hydrophilicity or polarity that can be reversibly switched from one form to another in the presence of CO2 (Jessop et al. 2005). This includes switchable hydrophilicity solvents (SHSs) (Jessop et al. 2010, 2011), and switchable polarity solvents (SPSs). Both are non-volatile and non-flammable, preventing volatilization or distillation during solvent recovery. However, SHSs are more attractive than SPSs, or even conventional solvents, as extraction solvents for KO because the SHS system works in the presence of water. Thus, the krill does not require drying prior to extraction, preventing the unwanted formation of the bicarbonate salt of 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0] undec-7-ene (DBU), which is formed when using SPSs (Boyd et al. 2012b). In addition, SHSs are less expensive and more stable. Lastly, SHS-water miscibility is fully reversible because after CO2 is gently removed (i.e., with low heat, bubbling with an inert gas), they return to their original hydrophobic state (Samorì et al. 2017).

In this paper, DMCHA was chosen for its low volatility, intermediate polarity, low toxicity, and relatively low water solubility (18 g·L−1) (Vanderveen et al. 2014). DMCHA was used to extract the KO from the Antarctic krill, a type of shrimp. The KO was separated by bubbling CO2 into the system in the presence of water at normal pressure then the solvent was recovered after the release of CO2. Subsequently, the effects of the extraction conditions, including extraction time, temperature, and shrimp/solvent ratio, were investigated to better understand the extraction system. The content of PL, astaxanthin, as well as the unsaturated fatty acid (UFA) and EPA + DHA ratio of FA in extracted KO, were measured. The DMCHA ratio remaining in the lipid layer was also determined.

Results and discussion

Extraction efficiency of PL, astaxanthin, FA by DMCHA

The oil extracted by DMCHA was analyzed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Astaxanthin, PL, and TG were all found in KO (Fig. 1). The high level of PL is the main characteristic of KO (Kolakowska 1991).
Fig. 1

a TLC plates of neutral developing agent; b TLC plates of polar developing agent

Figure 2a shows that the effect of different shrimp/solvent ratios on the PL extraction efficiency increased with reaction time. The total content of PL was extracted by the Folch method. The extraction efficiency of PL extracted by DMCHA gradually increased with an additional volume of DMCHA. In addition, the DMCHA extraction efficiency continued to increase until 12 h, reaching a maximum efficiency. After 12 h with a shrimp/solvent ratio of 1:20, 80.2% of total PL was extracted from the krill. The extraction efficiency of PL decreased slightly after 12 h due to the PL oxidation, as PL oxidation gradually increased with longer extraction times (Reis and Spickett 2012).
Fig. 2

a Effect of different solvent ratios and reaction times (h) on PL extraction efficiency (%). b Effect of different temperatures (°C) and reaction times (h) on PL extraction efficiency (%). c Comparison of phosphatidylcholine (PC)/phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) ratio. d Nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of PC and PE in KO

The effect of temperature on the PL extraction efficiency as the reaction time increased is shown in Fig. 2b. The PL yield increased as the temperature increased. The extraction efficiency increased as the reaction time increased, reaching a maximum of 76.2% at 45 °C after 12 h then decreasing slightly after the optimum reaction time, similar to the results presented in Fig. 2a.

Phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) were the two main types of PL detected in all KO samples. The relative proportions of PC and PE at different extraction temperatures are shown in Fig. 2c. In general, as the temperature increased, the percentage of PC in PL decreased from 90.91% to 82.35% as temperature had a negative effect on the selective extraction of PC (Teberikler et al. 2001). Our results also showed that PC was the most abundant PL in KO, rendering KO a good source of naturally-occurring PC.

Figure 3a shows that the extraction efficiency of astaxanthin increased when the shrimp/solvent ratio decreased. In addition, astaxanthin yield improved when the reaction time increased until equilibrium was attained. A reaction time of 12 h was the optimum reaction time to obtain a yield of 73.19%, as no significant changes occurred after 12 h. As shown in Fig. 3b, the extraction efficiency of astaxanthin increased with increasing temperature, as a higher temperature can promote mass transfer, leading to a higher astaxanthin yield. In addition, the extraction efficiency improved when the reaction time was increased from 1 to 24 h. From 1 to 6 h, the extraction efficiency increased the most quickly. After 6 h, the extraction rate was stable, finally reaching a maximum yield of 81.44%.
Fig. 3

a Effect of different solvent ratios and reaction times (h) on astaxanthin extraction efficiency (%). b Effect of different temperatures (°C) and reaction times (h) on astaxanthin extraction efficiency (%). Different letters at the top of data bars indicate significant differences (Tukey’s test, P < 0.05) between mean values (± SD, n = 3). c HPLC–DAD chromatography of astaxanthin and astaxanthin esters in krill oil extracted by the Folch method. d HPLC–DAD chromatography of astaxanthin and astaxanthin esters in krill oil extracted by DMCHA method. e Effect of different solvent ratios and reaction times (h) on FA extraction efficiency (%). f Effect of different temperatures (°C) and reaction times (h) on FA extraction efficiency (%)

Figure 3c, d show the comparison of the astaxanthin esters in KO extracted by the Folch method and that by the DMCHA method. Unlike the astaxanthin esters extracted from Haematococcus pluvialis, the content of the astaxanthin diester is more than that of the astaxanthin monoester in the oil extracted from Antarctic krill (Maoka et al. 1985). The free astaxanthin accounted for a small part both in Fig. 3c, d. The astaxanthin diester extracted by the Folch method was significantly more than the astaxanthin monoester. This trend was also seen when the KO was extracted by DMCHA (Fig. 3d).

Figure 3e shows the effect of the shrimp/solvent ratio on the extraction efficiency of FA. The extraction efficiency of FA increased when the solvent volume was increased. Specifically, the solvent ratio played a small role in the extraction of FAs when the ratios ranged from 1:15 to 1:20. On the other hand, the FA yield increased gradually with increasing reaction time and was almost saturated after 12 h extraction with DMCHA. After that, the yield did not significantly increase, and an FA yield of up to 80.81% could be achieved. Figure 3f illustrates the effect of temperature on the FA extraction efficiency. In the process, an increase in temperature enhanced the mass transfer process; hence, increasing the FA yield. In addition, the FA yield further increased with longer reaction times, becoming saturated after a 12 h treatment with DMCHA. An FA yield of up to 84.35% could be achieved at a temperature of 45 °C.

As the advantages of EPA and DHA in the form of PL gain increasing attention (Awada et al. 2013; Rossmeisl et al. 2012), KO is also attracting commercial interest as a new PUFA source that meets the demand for EPA and DHA in the health and nutrition markets (Zeng et al. 2016). Table 1 shows the effect of temperature on the FA composition of KO. The ratio of unsaturated fatty acids (UFA)/TFA in KO was higher than saturated fatty acid (SFA)/TFA, accounting for 59.60%–68.93%. The ratio of PUFA/TFA was between 40.10% and 47.74%. Among them, the EPA + DHA/TFA was up to 42.16% of TFA content, higher than that in KO extracted through the Folch method (36.67%). These results are consistent with the research of Bustos et al. (2003) and Xie et al. (2018) demonstrating that the extraction efficiency of DMCHA for UFA is higher than that of SFA. Meanwhile, as temperature increased, the ratio of PUFA/TFA decreased while SFA increased. Table 1 shows that from 25 to 35 °C, the absolute content of n-3 PUFA increased, while the ratio of n-3 PUFA/TFA decreased due to the greater increase of total fatty acid content. From 35 to 45 °C, the n-3 PUFA content decreased as well as the relative content as n-3 PUFA is sensitive to temperature and can be easily oxidized (Dooremalen et al. 2009).
Table 1

The FA compositions of KO extracted at different temperatures

Fatty acids

DMCHA 25 °C

DMCHA 35 °C

DMCHA 45 °C

Folch

C12:0 (µg)

19.37

22.96

26.28

22.20

C13:0 (µg)

10.81

12.94

14.24

10.81

C14:0 (µg)

894.08

1034.78

1218.18

1404.09

C14:1 (µg)

22.44

25.14

21.08

28.54

C15:0 (µg)

34.51

37.92

47.14

45.93

C15:1 (µg)

14.01

15.34

13.17

17.86

C16:0 (µg)

820.55

831.06

1157.94

1112.18

C16:1 (µg)

837.81

920.83

810.75

1319.73

C17:0 (µg)

33.48

35.78

46.09

41.59

C17:1 (µg)

22.00

24.02

21.63

26.83

C18:0 (µg)

206.22

202.77

299.91

231.44

C18:1N9C (µg)

367.23

367.71

379.19

467.92

C18:1N9T (µg)

23.34

27.94

22.00

19.04

C18:2N6C (µg)

100.14

114.75

97.62

116.52

C18:3N3 (µg)

127.73

130.18

121.93

179.67

C18:3N6 (µg)

28.78

33.60

27.93

38.59

C20:1 (µg)

56.93

59.95

53.11

81.51

C20:2 (µg)

28.77

31.71

25.81

25.36

C20:3N3 (µg)

21.40

27.62

20.59

0

C20:4N6 (µg)

68.39

56.10

63.99

55.05

C20:5N3 (µg)

2811.19

2859.49

2499.86

3103.34

C21:0 (µg)

22.61

27.55

29.60

17.04

C22:0 (µg)

45.72

53.84

60.47

38.21

C22:1N9 (µg)

44.66

48.99

46.51

54.74

C22:6N3 (µg)

21.34

27.36

20.98

17.10

C24:1 (µg)

35.20

37.87

32.30

35.16

∑TFA (µg)

6718.71

7068.20

7178.30

8510.45

∑SFA (%)

31.07

31.97

40.40

34.35

∑UFA (%)

68.93

68.03

59.60

65.65

∑PUFA (%)

47.74

46.42

40.10

41.54

∑EPA + DHA (%)

42.16

40.84

35.12

36.67

TFA total fatty acid, SFA saturated fatty acids, UFA unsaturated fatty acids

DMCHA breaks the surface structure of shrimp powder

The surface morphology of shrimp powders before and after oil extraction was observed by SEM. Figure 4a demonstrates that before extraction, the shrimp powder had a smooth surface and was covered with oily substances with no obvious drops. After extraction, as shown in Fig. 4b, there were many voids on the surface of shrimp powder with many muscle fibers exposed. The surface oily substance was dissolved in DMCHA, creating drops to expose the internal lipids, suggesting that DMCHA destroyed the outer structure of shrimp powder, thus increasing the dissolution of krill oil.
Fig. 4

SEM images of krill powders before (a) and after (b) extraction

Recovery rate and the amount of residual solvent

After the aqueous and amine layers were completely separated and the volume of amine layer was measured, the recovery rate was 93.2%. What’s more, as shown in Fig. 5a, 19.861 mg of the DMCHA was present in the lipid layer dissolved in D-14 hexane, corresponding to a 0.23% of remaining solvent when the DMCHA was used for the extraction.
Fig. 5

a1H NMR of lipid phase in D-14 hexane with dimethylterephthalate as the internal standard. a: The hydrogen peak on the benzene ring of dimethylterephthalate, b: the characteristic methyl hydrogen peak of dimethylterephthalate, c: the characteristic methyl hydrogen peak of DMCHA, and D-14 the solvent (D-14 hexane) characteristic peak. b Scheme of Antarctic krill extraction based on DMCHA

Mechanism of SHS-based extraction

SHSs are a second class of switchable solvents specifically designed for wet samples (Boyd et al. 2012a). Amidine and tertiary amine SHSs have been identified as switching between the two forms by the addition or removal of CO2 from the system. CO2 is preferred to initiate the switching process because it is non-toxic, benign, inexpensive, and easily removed (Jessop et al. 2010).

The overall process comprises an acid–base reaction with hydrated CO2. The native hydrophobic form of the DMCHA is shown in Fig. 5b. The DMCHA forms a bicarbonate salt that is water soluble. The DMCHA can be mixed with water samples and is easily separated from the aqueous phase by removing CO2 from solution by bubbling another gas. Alternatively, the hydrophilicity switch can be also triggered by altering the charge of the SHSs by pH shift, which is especially useful in the context of microextraction because it reduces the potential losses by evaporation or splashing during the CO2 removal process.

This behavior has been exploited as a method for removing solvent from products such as soybean oil (Jessop et al. 2010), algae oil (Samorì et al. 2013), and bitumen (Holland et al. 2012), astaxanthin (Huang et al. 2018) and high density polystyrene powder (Jessop et al. 2011). For the first time, we were able to extract lipids from Antarctic krill without any treatment for cell disruption while avoiding the use of volatile organic solvents and their associated evaporation energy costs for lipid recovery.

Conclusions

This study proved that DMCHA can be used to extract lipids from Antarctic krill in an environmentally friendly way. The extraction efficiency of PL, astaxanthin, and FA in the extracted KO is comparable to that of the chloroform/methanol extraction method. Furthermore, the solvent waste in the lipid layer is only 0.23% of the DMCHA used for the extraction. This research established an efficient technique for extracting lipids from Antarctic krill using green solvents with low operational costs and energy consumption. Thus, this technique will contribute to the cost-effective utilization of highly abundant Antarctic krill.

Materials and methods

Materials

Antarctic krill was harvested from the Antarctic area by China National Fisheries Co., Ltd., frozen, then transported back to Qingdao cold storage. The sample we used in this study was obtained after microwave thawing, heating at 95 °C for 5 min, and centrifugation.

DMCHA (industrial grade > 99%), triphenylphosphate, methylphenidate, methanol hydrochloride, n-hexane, n-hexadecanoic acid methyl ester, chloroform, dimethylterephthalate, dichloromethane, methyl tert-butyl ether, methanol, petroleum ether, ether, acetic acid, deuterated chloroform, and ethanol were purchased from Shanghai Beihe Chemical Co. Ltd (China). D-14 hexane was purchased from Omega (America).

Total lipid content

The total lipid content of Antarctic krill was measured by the Folch method after the Antarctic krill cells were thoroughly homogenized (Folch et al. 1957). Briefly, 1 g of freeze-dried Antarctic krill meal was weighed, and the lipids were extracted using 20 mL of a 2:1 chloroform/methanol (v/v) mixture.

Lipid extraction through DMCHA

To determine the effect of the shrimp/solvent ratio on the lipid extraction, three shrimp/solvent volume ratios, 1:20, 1:15, and 1:4, were established. Then, 1 g of Antarctic krill (water content of 70%) was weighed and the lipids extracted using DMCHA at room temperature. The filtrate was collected after extracting for 1, 6, 12, and 24 h, and an equal volume of water was added. The filtrate/water biphasic mixture was subjected to CO2 bubbling using a gas dispersion tube until the amine and water layers combined, leaving the lipid layer floating on the surface. After centrifugation, the oil was collected in a glass vessel for analysis.

To compare the effect of temperature, lipids were extracted at three temperatures, 25 °C, 35 °C, 45 °C. After extracting for 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h with a 1:15 shrimp/solvent ratio at each temperature, lipids were extracted into a glass vessel for analysis.

Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) for lipid class separation (Akanbi and Barrow 2017)

An aliquot of 10 mg of KO was suspended in 200 μL of dichloromethane and spotted onto TLC plates (20 cm × 20 cm) (Merck). Spots were visualized under ultraviolet light and lipid classes identified using standards to determine the type of lipid.

Surface structure changes of shrimp powders

The morphology of the Antarctic krill powders before and after DMCHA extraction was characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Hitachi S-4800, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. The powders were sprinkled onto double-backed cellophane tape attached to an aluminum stub before coating with gold palladium in an argon atmosphere (Hondoh et al. 2016).

Determination of PLs in extracted KO by NMR

The phospholipid contents and compositions were determined by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), as previously described by Li (2014) with slight modifications. All NMR experiments were conducted with a Bruker Avance Spectrometer 500 (Bruker, Germany) operating at 243 MHz and 25 °C. KO (5 mg) dissolved in 900 µL of CDCl3 and 100 µL of triphenylphosphate (TPP, 100 mmol/L) as an internal standard were added to the NMR tubes. The relative integrated intensity of each peak was applied to calculate the concentration and composition of the lipids. The PL yields were calculated according to the peak area ratios relative to that of the TPP reference.

Determination of astaxanthin in extracted KO by HPLC

A high-performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC, LC-20AT, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an ultraviolet detector (SPD-20A, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and YMC-Carotenoid-C30 (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) (Japan YMC Co., Ltd.) were used to analyze astaxanthin based on the method described by Rao et al. (2013) with slight modifications. Briefly, the extracted KO was dissolved in 3 mL of dichloromethane. After filtration with a 0.22-µm filter, 0.5 mL of the product was placed into liquid vials. The resulting product was analyzed by HPLC. The resulting product (free astaxanthin, astaxanthin monoester, and astaxanthin diester) was analyzed by HPLC. LC conditions were optimized to analyze astaxanthin within 40 min at 30 °C, using mobile phases consisting of (A) methanol and (B) methylphenidate. Using a flow rate of 1 mL/min, the gradient consisted of a ramp from 100% A to 90% A over 10 min, then 10–20 min from 90% A to 60% A, followed by a hold at 60% A for 10 min, then from 60% A back to 90% A at 30–35 min, ending with a hold at 90% A for 5 min. The injection volume was 60 μL. The astaxanthin was detected at a wavelength of 476 nm, and the measured amount was based on the peak area of the standard astaxanthin.

Lipid transesterification and FAMES analysis by GC–MS

Variable amounts of extracted lipids (30–50 mg) from shrimp were converted into fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) through transesterification (Chiappe et al. 2016). Briefly, the extracted lipids were dissolved in 25 mL of ethanol, taking 5 mL into the centrifuge tube. Next, 2 mL of methanol hydrochloride was added then 3 mL of a chloroform/methanol (v/v 1:1) mixture was added. Methyl nonadecanoate was added as an internal standard before starting transesterification at 85 °C for 1 h. After cooling to room temperature, n-hexane was used to dilute the upper organic layer after centrifugation for 5 min at 10,000 r/min, which was then used for analysis.

The FAMEs that were recovered were analyzed with a Thermo Fisher Trace 1310 ISQ GC/MS equipped with a TG-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm; coating thickness 0.25 μm). The FAME samples were finally identified by comparing the retention times of the mixture of FAME standards with those of the sample peaks. The FA contents are expressed as weight (µg) of every type of fatty acid (Yin et al. 2015).

Content of the residual solvent in the lipid layer

The water/DMCHA mixture was separated by bubbling with N2, with the mixture heated until the aqueous and amine layers were completely separated (Samorì et al. 2013). To determine the loss of DMCHA into the lipid phase, after switching DMCHA (5 mL) into DMCHAH + HCO3− using CO2 and H2O (5 mL), 1 mL of D-14 hexane was added to dissolve the lipid layer for analysis. In addition, dimethyllterephthalate was used as an internal standard to perform 1H NMR quantitative analysis. Spectra were recorded in D-14 hexane using a 5-mm probe on a VARIAN Mercury 400 spectrometer.

Statistical analysis

The oil extraction experiments were performed in triplicate (n = 3). For each triplicate, at least three measurements were performed. Statistical analysis was conducted using the statistical software SPSS version 20.0. The results were statistically evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Tukey’s test. Significant differences between means were assessed at P < 0.05.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U606403): Marine Drugs and Biological Products was appreciated.

Author contributions

XJ, WH and CX designed this review. WS wrote the article. BS joined the experiment. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance and ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Animal and human rights statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Akanbi TO, Barrow CJ (2017) Compositional information useful for authentication of Krill oil and the detection of adulterants. Food Anal Methods 11:1–10Google Scholar
  2. Auerswald L, Meyer B, Teschke M, Hagen W, Kawaguchi S (2015) Physiological response of adult Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba, to long-term starvation. Polar Biol 38:763–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Awada M, Meynier A, Soulage CO, Hadji L, Géloën A, Viau M, Ribourg L, Benoit B, Debard C, Guichatdant M, Lagarde M, Genot C, Lagarde M (2013) n-3 PUFA added to high-fat diets affect differently adiposity and inflammation when carried by phospholipids or triacylglycerols in mice. Nutr Metab 10(1):23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd AR, Champagne P, McGinn PJ, MacDougall KM, Melanson JE, Jessop PG (2012) Switchable hydrophilicity solvents for lipid extraction from microalgae for biofuel production. Bioresour Technol 118:628–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruheim I, Griinari, M, Tilseth S, Banni S, Cohn JS, Mancinelli D (2015) U.S. Patent No. 9,034,388. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Bustos R, Romo L, Yanez K, Diaz G, Romo C (2003) Oxidative stability of carotenoid pigments and polyunsaturated fatty acids in microparticulate diets containing krill oil for nutrition of marine fish larvae. J Food Eng 56:289–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiappe C, Mezzetta A, Pomelli CS, Iaquaniello G, Gentile A, Masciocchi B (2016) Development of cost-effective biodiesel from microalgae using protic ionic liquids. Green Chem 18(18):4982–4989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooney M, Young G, Nagle N (2009) Extraction of bio-oils from microalgae. Sep Purif Methods 38:291–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costanzo M, Cesi V, Prete E, Negroni A, Palone F, Cucchiara S, Oliva S, Leter B, Stronati L (2016) Krill oil reduces intestinal inflammation by improving epithelial integrity and impairing adherent-invasive Escherichia coli pathogenicity. Dig Liver Dis 48:34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dooremalen CV, Pel R, Ellers J (2009) Maximized PUFA measurements improve insight in changes in fatty acid composition in response to temperature. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 72:88–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Folch JML, Lees MP, Stanley GHAS (1957) A sample method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissue. J Biol Chem 226:497–509PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedrich JP, Pryde EH (1984) Supercritical CO2 extraction of lipid-bearing materials and characterization of the products. J Am Oil Chem Soc 61:223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gigliotti JC, Davenport MP, Beamer SK, Tou JC, Jaczynski J (2011) Extraction and characterisation of lipids from Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba). Food Chem 125:1028–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grantham GJ (1977) The Southern Ocean: the utilization of krill. FAO Southern ocean Fisheries Survey Programme. GLO/SO/77/3, 1–61.Google Scholar
  15. Haider J, Majeed H, Williams PA, Safdar W, Zhong F (2017) Formation of chitosan nanoparticles to encapsulate krill oil (Euphausia superba) for application as a dietary supplement. Food Hydrocoll 63:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holland A, Wechsler D, Patel A, Molloy BM, Boyd AR, Jessop PG (2012) Separation of bitumen from oil sands using a switchable hydrophilicity. Can J Chem 90:805–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hondoh H, Yamasaki K, Ikutake M, Ueno S (2016) Visualization of oil migration in chocolate using scanning electron microscopy–energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Food Struct 8:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang WC, Liu H, Sun W, Xue C, Mao X (2018) Effective astaxanthin extraction from wet Haematococcus pluvialis using switchable hydrophilicity solvents. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:1560–1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jessop PG, Heldebrant DJ, Li X, Eckert CA, Liotta CL (2005) Green chemistry: reversible nonpolar-to-polar solvent. Nature 436:1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jessop PG, Phan LN, Carrier AJ, Resendes R, Wechsler D (2010) A solvent having switchable hydrophilicity. Green Chem 12:809–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jessop PG, Kozycz L, Rahami ZG, Schoenmakers D, Boyd AR, Wechsler D, Holland AM (2011) Tertiary amine solvents having switchable hydrophilicity. Green Chem 13:619–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kolakowska A (1991) The influence of sex and maturity stage of krill (Euphausia superba Dana) upon the content and composition of its lipids. Angew Chem Int Ed 47:8650–8653Google Scholar
  23. Lee MF, Lai CS, Cheng AC, Hou JS, Badmaev V, Ho CT, Pan MH (2015) Krill oil and xanthigen separately inhibit high fat diet induced obesity and hepatic triacylglycerol accumulation in mice. J Funct Foods 19:913–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li J (2014) Validation of one-phase 31P NMR method for quantification of phospholipids in waste gums and their refined products. In: Euro fed lipid congress “fats, oils and lipids: new challenges in technology, quality control and health”Google Scholar
  25. Maoka T, Katsuyama M, Kaneko N, Matsuno T (1985) Stereochemical investigation of carotenoids in the antarctic krill Euphausia superba. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 51:1671–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rao AR, Baskaran V, Sarada R, Ravishankar GA (2013) In vivo bioavailability and antioxidant activity of carotenoids from microalgal biomass—a repeated dose study. Food Res Int 54:711–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reis A, Spickett CM (2012) Chemistry of phospholipid oxidation. BBA Biomembranes 1818:2374–2387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rossmeisl M, Jilkova ZM, Kuda O, Jelenik T, Medrikova D, Stankova B, Kristinsson B, Haraldsson G, Svensen H, Stoknes I, Sjovall P, Magnusson Y, Balvers M, Verhoeckx G, Tvrzicka E, Bryhn M, Kopecky J (2012) Metabolic effects of n-3 PUFA as phospholipids are superior to triglycerides in mice fed a high-fat diet: possible role of endocannabinoids. PloS ONE 7(6):e38834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Samorì C, Barreiro DL, Vet R, Pezzolesi L, Brilman DWF, Galletti P, Tagliavini E (2013) Effective lipid extraction from algae cultures using switchable solvents. Green Chem 15:353–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Samorì C, Cespi D, Blair P, Galletti P, Malferrari D, Passarini F, Vassura I, Tagliavini E (2017) Application of switchable hydrophilicity solvents for recycling multilayer packaging materials. Green Chem 19:1714–1720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schuchardt JP, Schneider I, Meyer H, Neubronner J, Schacky CV, Hahn A (2011) Incorporation of EPA and DHA into plasma phospholipids in response to different omega-3 fatty acid formulations—a comparative bioavailability study of fish oil vs. krill oil. Lipids Health Dis 10:145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Teberikler L, Koseoglu S, Akgerman A (2001) Selective extraction of phosphatidylcholine from lecithin by supercritical carbon dioxide/ethanol mixture. J Am Oil Chem Soc 78:115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tou JC, Jaczynski J, Chen YC (2007) Krill for human consumption: nutritional value and potential health benefits. Nutr Rev 65:63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vanderveen J, Durelle J, Jessop P (2014) Design and evaluation of switchable-hydrophilicity solvents. Green Chem 16:1187–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xie D, Jin J, Sun J, Liang L, Wang X, Zhang W, Wang X, Jin Q (2017) Comparison of solvents for extraction of krill oil from krill meal: lipid yield, phospholipids content, fatty acids composition and minor components. Food Chem 233:434–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xie D, Mu H, Tang T, Wang X, Wei W, Jin J, Wang X, Jin Q (2018) Production of three types of krill oils from krill meal by a three-step solvent extraction procedure. Food Chem 248:279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yin FW, Liu XY, Fan XR, Zhou DY, Xu WS, Zhu BW, Murata YY (2015) Extrusion of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) meal and its effect on oil extraction. Int J Food Sci Technol 50:633–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zeng SJ, Tao CD, Parnas R, Jiang W, Liang B, Liu YY, Lu HF (2016) Jatropha curcas L. oil extracted by switchable solvent N,N-dimethylcyclohexylamine for biodiesel production. Chin J Chem Eng 24:1640–1646CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ocean University of China 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Weiwei Sun
    • 1
  • Wencan Huang
    • 1
  • Bowen Shi
    • 1
  • Changhu Xue
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xiaoming Jiang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Food Science and EngineeringOcean University of ChinaQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Laboratory for Marine Drugs and Bioproducts of Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations