Advertisement

Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 142–150 | Cite as

Effects of Recreational Soccer on Health Outcomes: A Narrative Review

  • Israel Castillo-Bellot
  • Jose Mora-Gonzalez
  • Luis Fradua
  • Francisco B. Ortega
  • Luis Gracia-MarcoEmail author
Review article

Abstract

Soccer is a very popular team sport that involves a variety of physical actions, such as sprints, accelerations, sudden decelerations, and jumps, among others. Research has placed recreational soccer in a good position as a strategy to increase physical activity levels and promote health across the lifespan. In this regard, recreational (non-competitive) soccer promotes social interaction and has the potential to increase long-term adherence to physical activity, even in those without prior experience in this sport. In this narrative review, we address the effects of recreational soccer on various health outcomes across the lifespan (i.e., from childhood to the elderly years) in both sexes. In addition, the beneficial effects of recreational soccer for people with prevalent pathologies, such as hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus, and cancer, are discussed.

Keywords

Physical fitness Physical activity Hypertension Diabetes Cancer Football 

Introduction

Soccer is a very popular team sport with more than 400 million active federated players around the world and with a great potential as a health promotion strategy for inactive and sedentary people [38, 40]. Most studies that have analyzed the effect of physical exercise on health, have traditionally focused on walking, running or cycling at intensities between 30% and 90% of the maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) [29]. However, few studies have analyzed the effects of a team sport such as soccer, in which frequent changes in intensity occur, on different health outcomes [23].

Soccer is characterised by a variety of physical actions including sprints, accelerations, sudden decelerations, jumps of maximum intensity and rapid and powerful kicks, among others. This combination of skills seems to improve cardiorespiratory and musculoskeletal physical fitness and therefore, decrease the risk of suffering from prevalent diseases [29]. The very nature of soccer places it as a high-intensity interval training exercise that has received a lot of attention in the last years due to its potential health benefits.

Within the context of sport and health, it is important to distinguish between competitive (especially elite) and recreational sport, because their characteristics and potential effects are different. The present narrative review focuses on recreational soccer, exclusively. Recreational soccer can be defined as the practice of soccer without the existence of a competitive objective within the framework of a federated competition or a license for its practice, encompassing only the practice of soccer in a free form and with recreational or health purposes.

Several intervention studies have been carried out in order to evaluate the effect of recreational soccer on various health outcomes in different populations, such as children and adolescents [15, 19, 27, 41, 46, 53, 54, 55, 56], adults [1, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 20, 24, 32, 33, 37, 41], elderly [4, 5, 17, 41, 45], premenopausal women [16, 26, 28], hypertensive [2, 3, 22, 30, 34], type II diabetics [14, 44], people in unfavourable social situations ("homeless") [42], and as an adjunct to treatment in cancer patients and cancer survivors [12, 13, 49, 50, 51, 52]. Importantly, recreational soccer also promotes social interaction, the creation of social capital and links between the people involved. It also seems to have the potential to promote long-term adherence to physical activity, even for men and women with no prior experience in this sport [13].

The number and diversity of studies focused on examining the potential benefits of recreational soccer is high, and therefore, a review and synthesis of the available evidence is required. This narrative review brings together previous reviews [7, 23, 25, 29], as well as original articles published later in both sexes. Therefore, the aim of this review is to study the beneficial effects of recreational soccer on health outcomes in untrained people of different ages, sex and socioeconomic status. This review also aims to compile the existing evidence about the beneficial effects of recreational soccer in people suffering from prevalent pathologies, such as hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus and cancer.

Soccer, Health and Men

Regular soccer training (i.e., 2 to 3 times a week) in small-sided games (3 vs. 3, 5 vs. 5), has been shown as an effective strategy for obtaining significant cardiovascular and muscular adaptations (Table 1). These physiological adaptations (i.e., muscle hypertrophy and increased strength levels) take place regardless of age, sex or soccer experience, and are therefore, of clinical importance [25]. Recent research has also shown that the practice of recreational soccer even for short periods of time (e.g., weeks) improves the musculoskeletal, metabolic and cardiovascular systems [29]. Particularly, an increase in VO2max, and a decrease in blood pressure and fat mass were observed over a relatively short period of recreational soccer practice (12 weeks). Interestingly, these improvements remained 1 year later despite the reduction in the number of sessions from 3 to 1 per week [23]. In another study, Krustrup et al. [29] compared the effects of a 12-week recreational soccer program vs. a continuous running program that followed the physical activity guidelines in adults (20–43 years old). The soccer group showed significant increments in the lower limbs lean mass, bone mass and fat oxidation capacity during training and a significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol compared to the continuous running group. These data suggest that the intermittent nature of an activity such as soccer, alternating maximum and submaximal exercise intensity periods, stimulates the musculoskeletal system and produces important cardiovascular adaptations after 12 weeks.
Table 1

Summary of soccer-related studies, main outcome variables and main findings in healthy populations of different ages, sex and socioeconomic status

Population

Age (years)

Duration (weeks)

Frequency (sessions/week)

Main outcome variables

Main findings/conclusions

Children and adolescents [15, 19, 27, 41, 46, 53, 54, 55, 56]

8–14

10–20

1–4

Weight, fat-free mass, % body fat, BMC, BMD, bone area, bone geometry, bone stiffness, osteocalcin, leptin, balance, blood pressure, resting heart rate, systolic function, diastolic function, cardiac structure, peripheral arterial function

Improvements in: bone mineral content, body composition, cardiac structure and function

Adults

20–63

    

 Women [1, 8, 9, 10, 16, 19, 26, 28, 30, 37, 41]

 

15–40

1–3

VO2max, capillary density, reflex response, osteocalcin, BMC, BMD, PINP, CTX-1, muscular pain, perceived exertion, muscle mass, muscle strength, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, blood pressure, BMI, % body fat, heart rate, diastolic function, cardiac structure

Improvements in: cardiorespiratory health, musculoskeletal health (through osteogenesis), muscular adaptations, falls and fractures, sensory-motor function

 Men [20, 23, 24, 32, 41]

 

12–52

1–3

Elderly population [4, 5, 17, 41, 43]

65–75

16–52

1–3

Cardiac structure, systolic function, diastolic function, blood pressure, VO2max, P1NP, CTX-1, osteocalcin, BMD, BMI, muscle mass, % body fat, capillary density, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HbA1c, plasma glucose, plasma insulin, muscle strength

Improvements in: cardiovascular health, osteogenesis, physical function and body composition

BMC bone mineral content, BMD bone mineral density, BMI body mass index, CTX-I type I collagen C-telopeptide, HbA1c glycated haemoglobin, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, P1NP aminoterminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen, VO2max maximal oxygen consumption

In youth, soccer training has been proven to be an effective method to improve performance in intermittent exercise, and improve coordination and VO2max [25]. In obese children, regular participation in a soccer program is at least as effective as a physical exercise program for improving fitness, health and self-esteem outcomes [25]. In addition, cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in male adolescent athletes (12–14 years old) have shown soccer to be a much more osteogenic sport compared with swimming and cycling at regions of clinical relevance, such as the hip and femoral neck [54, 55, 56]. These are key findings that soccer maximizing peak bone mass during growth reduces the risk of osteopenia and/or osteoporosis later in life [53].

The potential benefits of recreational soccer are also evident in unfavourable socio-economic circumstances as shown by the findings from the intervention carried out by Randers et al. [42] in adults (37 ± 10 years). The authors implemented a recreational soccer program to homeless people and found that 12 weeks of training, 3 times a week, improved participants’ VO2max (from 36.7 to 40.6 mL/min/kg), reduced their body fat by 1.6 kg and LDL cholesterol by 6%. In addition, their resistance and capacity to carry out intermittent exercises significantly improved, causing a marked impact on the cardiovascular health of this disadvantaged group in need of clinical care.

One of the reasons behind the positive findings in such diverse populations, may be the level of intensity reached as indicated by the elevated heart rate responses recorded, which can be achieved by just varying the number of players and/or the pitch size during the games [39]. These games, usually called small-sided games (4 vs. 4, 5 vs. 5, 6 vs. 6, 7 vs. 7), seem to have the potential to create physiological adaptations and improve performance following regular training [41]. In addition, factors such as the number of players or the size of the playing area may vary the cardiovascular demand, which is increased when the game takes place with fewer players. Therefore, the number of players stands as a primary factor when controlling the intensity of tasks and training in soccer [6].

The long-term benefits of soccer on health outcomes were examined by Schmidt et al. [43] in their study with 17 veteran football players (68.1 ± 2.1 years) who had played soccer in a federated, non-recreational way, and a control group of 26 healthy and active participants (68.2 ± 3.2 years) who had not participated in programs of structured physical exercise. In this study, the authors concluded that participation in soccer was associated with improved systolic function of the left ventricle, physical fitness, microvascular function and a healthy body composition. These findings are of great importance, since the cardiovascular function has been linked to a reduction in morbidity and mortality rates [43]. Sundstrup et al. [47] found that the ability to quickly develop muscle strength and postural stability was better in elderly people (69.6 ± 1.4 years) who had played soccer during their lifetime, which may counterbalance unexpected disturbances in postural balance, typical of this population group. The rate of force development and balance in the elderly players was so admirable that no deficits were found compared to a group of untrained young individuals (32.4 ± 0.9 years). Figure 1 shows some of the main health benefits.
Fig. 1

Health-related indicators, risk factors and diseases derived from lifestyle habits.

Adapted from Krustrup et al. [23]

Although the health benefits of recreational soccer practice are numerous as shown in this narrative review, it is important to mention that, as in any sport, there is a risk of injury. According to data from a study conducted in Spanish amateur soccer players, the frequency of getting injured is 0.11 per player per year, or 1 out of 10 players suffer an injury every year [18]. In professional soccer players from the Spanish First Division, the overall incidence of injuries is 5.6 per 1000 h of exposure, and the incidence is significantly higher during competition and training (43.5 vs. 3.5 per 1000 h of exposure, respectively) [35], a pattern that is also observed in players from the Spanish Second Division [36]. Both in recreational and professional soccer, injuries of lower extremity, especially of thigh, knees and ankles, predominate.

Soccer, Health and Women

Women's soccer is one of the fastest growing sport activities. In fact, there has been a 50% increase in the number of players worldwide during the last 8 years [28]. In recent years, the interest on the health effects of recreational soccer in untrained women have substantially grown [1, 8, 16, 28]. Randers et al. [38] compared the cardiovascular health profiles of three groups: a group of 27 elite soccer players (24.4 ± 4.0 years), a group of 8 untrained women (27.0 ± 6.5 years) who participated in a recreational soccer program during 16-week, and a control group of 28 untrained women (29.3 ± 5.7 years) who did not perform any intervention. The results showed that elite players had a better cardiovascular health profile, higher VO2max, lower percentage of body fat and better cardiac function than the control group. Interestingly, the results also showed that the cardiovascular health profile of the untrained women involved in the 16-week program significantly improved with respect to the control group, although no differences were observed in comparison with the elite players.

Jackman et al. [19] found in their study with 8 untrained women (27.0 ± 6.5 years, VO2max 33.8 ± 5.7 mL/min/kg) that took participation in a 16-week recreational soccer program produced positive adaptations in the musculoskeletal health profile, including an increase in lean mass, reduction in fat mass, improved postural balance and increased osteocalcin concentrations. Pedersen et al. [37] emphasized that recreational soccer for women (19–45 years old), as opposed to continuous running, was effective in improving the response to sudden overloads on the trunk, suggesting that soccer training has the potential to lower the risk of lower back injury, a well-known clinical and social issue nowadays.

In later stages of menopause, muscle dysfunction and reduced bone mineral density could predispose to the development of osteoporosis and sarcopenia later in life. Therefore, maintaining an active lifestyle during the pre-menopausal stage may preserve bone mass and delay the onset of osteoporosis and sarcopenia [33]. So far, some studies have been carried out for examining the effect of participating in recreational soccer in untrained pre-menopausal women. Krustrup et al. [28] compared the benefits of two intervention programs on health outcomes in untrained pre-menopausal women (36 ± 2 years); with a 16-week soccer training period vs. moderate intensity continuous running. After the 16-week intervention period, the soccer group decreased their blood pressure, fat mass and resting heart rate, while improvements in VO2max, lipid profile, muscle capillarization and arterial stiffness were found. Moreover, improvements in the systolic and diastolic function of the left ventricle were found, suggesting that the cardiac adaptations seem to be more consistent through participation in soccer than continuous running [1].

Similarly, Krustrup et al. [26] examined the long-term effects (16 months, two 1-h sessions per week) of recreational soccer training (40 ± 3 years) and continuous running (40 ± 2 years) in pre-menopausal women in comparison with a control group (38 ± 4 years). Specifically, the authors examined musculoskeletal and cardiac adaptations and reported a 24% increase in the left ventricular diameter after diastole in the soccer group, only a 5% increase in the continuous running group and no adaptations in the control group. Muscular function, reflex response, balance and bone mineral density improved in both intervention groups, but more significantly in the soccer group. In addition, the size of the cardiac chambers increased, as well as the left ventricular function (systolic and diastolic) and the right ventricular function (systolic).

Soccer and Prevalent Diseases

Research has shown soccer participation improves health outcomes also in people suffering from various pathologies such as hypertension, type II diabetes or cancer (Table 2).
Table 2

Summary of soccer-related studies, main outcome variables and main findings in unhealthy populations

Disease

Age (years)

Duration (weeks)

Frequency (sessions/week)

Main outcome variables

Main findings/conclusions

Hypertension [2, 3, 22, 30, 34]

30–55

12–24

1–3

Blood pressure, resting heart rate, heart rate variability, VO2max, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol total cholesterol, triglycerides, % body fat, peripheral arterial function, plasma glucose, plasma insulin, BMC, BMD, fat-free mass, cardiac structure, systolic function, diastolic function

Improvements in: cardiovascular profile (through blood pressure), metabolic profile, physical fitness (e.g. aerobic) and body composition

Diabetes mellitus type II [14, 44]

48–68

12–24

2–3

VO2max, BMD, fat-free mass, BMI, waist circumference, plasma glucose, HbA1c, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, plasma insulin, insulin resistance, cardiac structure, systolic function, diastolic function

Improvements in: cardiovascular profile (through triglycerides, blood pressure, VO2max, cardiac function and insulin sensitivity)

Prostate cancer [12, 13, 49, 50, 51, 52]

58–74

12–24

2–3

BMI, % body fat, BMC, BMD, fat-free mass, muscle strength, CTX-1, osteocalcin, P1NP, balance, VO2max

Improvements in: physical function and body composition (through muscle mass, muscle strength, and bone mass)

BMC bone mineral content, BMD bone mineral density, BMI body mass index, CTX-I type I collagen C-telopeptide, HbA1c glycated haemoglobin, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, P1NP aminoterminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen, VO2max maximal oxygen consumption

Hypertension

High blood pressure is associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and the likelihood of suffering from stroke, coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation and renal failure [2].

Currently, there is strong scientific evidence of the influence that aerobic activities have on reducing blood pressure. In addition, the practice of an intermittent sport such as recreational soccer has been associated with lower blood pressure [34]. In this regard, Krustrup et al. [30] managed to reduce blood pressure levels in a group of adults with moderate hypertension, with two 1-h soccer training sessions weekly over 6 months. The systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased from 151 ± 10 to 139 ± 10 mmHg and from 92 ± 7 to 84 ± 6 mmHg, respectively. However, the reduction was lower in a group that was asked to follow the physical activity guidelines for adults [31], lowering the systolic blood pressure from 153 ± 8 to 145 ± 8 mmHg and the diastolic blood pressure from 96 ± 6 to 93 ± 6 mmHg. Similar results were found in the study by Andersen et al. [3], with two intervention groups, one of them receiving recreational soccer training and the other one following the traditional medical physical activity recommendations. After 3 months, the soccer group had the systolic and diastolic blood pressure reduced by 12 ± 3 and 7 ± 1 mmHg, respectively, while no significant changes were observed in the group receiving the physical activity recommendations. In addition, parameters such as resting heart rate, VO2max and body fat improved to a greater extent in the soccer group with respect to the physical activity recommendations group. Knoepfli-Lenzin et al. [22] compared the effect of 12-week soccer practice or continuous running on blood pressure. Both groups performed the same training volume, 1 h per week, 2.4 sessions per week and managed to reduce blood pressure. However, this reduction was significantly greater in the soccer group than the continuous running group (− 9 ± 5 mmHg vs. − 4 ± 6 mmHg).

Despite the studies conducted in this field are recent, the findings support the potential of recreational football as a non-pharmacological complement for the treatment of mild and moderate hypertension in middle-aged men, without previous experience in this sport [3]. In this line, recreational soccer seems to have positive effects on various parameters of arterial health, such as a marked reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, as well as a lower resting heart rate, lower body fat content, higher levels of VO2max and healthier lipid profile [25].

Type II Diabetes

The prevalence of type II diabetes in adults worldwide is estimated to rise to 5.4% [21]. Physical exercise, due to its effectiveness in the control of the disease and few adverse effects [48], has been considered as one of the main pillars for diabetes’ treatment, along with diet and medication. Specifically, type II diabetes stands as a global health issue linked with obesity and a sedentary lifestyle and, increases the risk of mortality and morbidity [48]. In this context, Schmidt et al. [44] examined the effectiveness of a 24-week recreational soccer program (two 1-h sessions weekly) on various health outcomes in type II diabetic adults (50 years old). The findings showed that the soccer group improved cardiac structure and function, the capacity to perform physical exercise and cope with intermittent efforts, VO2max and blood pressure levels, compared to the control group. This study was the first to report an improved myocardial systolic function after a physical exercise program in patients with type II diabetes. These findings are of relevance since improvements in the cardiorespiratory system may reduce morbidity and mortality rates in this population. In addition, findings from an intervention study carried out in men and women between the ages of 48 and 68, showed soccer participation (40 min, 3 times a week for 12 weeks) together with diet program to be more effective in improving insulin sensitivity, VO2max and lipids profile than just undergoing a diet program [14].

Cancer

There seems to be a consensus in the key role of physical activity to improve physical capacity and quality of life in cancer patients [13]. Prostate cancer, the most frequent among men, is known to increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and osteoporosis [12]. In addition, prostate cancer is associated with adverse effects caused by androgen deprivation treatment, such as rapid loss of bone mass, decreased performance and physical function, and increased risk of fractures [51]. Several studies using recreational soccer interventions in patients with prostate cancer have been published [12, 13, 49, 50, 51, 52], and findings show improvements in body composition (i.e., increase in muscle mass and bone mineral density and decrease in adipose tissue), muscle strength, physical function, and quality of life.

In the study published by Uth et al. [50], patients (67.1 ± 7.1 years) under treatment for prostate cancer were assigned either to a soccer group (2–3 times per week, 45–60 min, during 32 weeks) or a control group (no intervention). The main findings showed the soccer group improved bone mineral density of the hip and femoral neck, and physical function during activities such as climbing stairs or jumps, in comparison with control group. In addition, improvements in the strength of the knee extensors and total lean mass were also observed in this soccer group [51].

It is important to underline that soccer has other benefits, such as those from a social and personal perspective. Soccer acts as a link among patients making them able to approach other patients with their same condition, with whom they share their intimacy and experiences related to the pathology and its treatment [13].

To sum up, the evidence regarding the effects of recreational soccer on health outcomes in people with prevalent diseases suggest that soccer practice can be a real form in the treatment of hypertension, but not for that of type II diabetes and cancer. While the benefits in hypertension relate to lowering blood pressure, for type II diabetes and cancer relate to general well-being and health risk. Of note, different pitch sizes imply different physiologic demands; however, since this information was not available in a number of the manuscripts used for this narrative review, we cannot draw conclusions at this respect.

Conclusions

Football stands as a form of physical exercise with important clinical implications for people with different socioeconomic status and physical fitness. The present narrative review describes how the practice of recreational soccer is associated with a series of physiological stimuli capable of improving numerous parameters related to cardiovascular, metabolic and musculoskeletal health, as well as psychological and social dimensions. Finally, the review describes the clinical utility of recreational soccer in health outcomes in people suffering from prevalent pathologies such as hypertension, type II diabetes and cancer.

Notes

Author Contributions

All authors have substantially contributed in writing and critically reviewing the manuscript.

Funding

F.B.O. Research activity is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness—MINECO/FEDER (DEP2016-79512-R); the University of Granada, Plan Propio de Investigación 2016, Excellence actions: Units of Excellence, Unit of Excellence on Exercise and Health (UCEES); the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 667302; the SAMID III network, RETICS, funded by the PN I + D + I 2017–2021 (Spain), L.G.M. is funded by Programa de Captación de Talento—UGR Fellows, from the University of Granada, Spain. J.M.G. is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport (FPU14/06837).

References

  1. 1.
    Andersen LJ, Hansen PR, Søgaard P, Madsen JK, Bech J, Krustrup P. Improvement of systolic and diastolic heart function after physical training in sedentary women. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(Suppl 1):50–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andersen LJ, Randers MB, Hansen PR, Hornstrup T, Schmidt JF, Dvorak J, Søgaard P, Krustrup P, Bangsbo J. Structural and functional cardiac adaptations to 6 months of football training in untrained hypertensive men. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(Suppl 1):27–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andersen LJ, Randers MB, Westh K, Martone D, Hansen PR, Junge A, Dvorak J, Bangsbo J, Krustrup P. Football as a treatment for hypertension in untrained 30- to 55-year-old men: a prospective randomized study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(Suppl 1):98–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andersen TR, Schmidt JF, Nielsen JJ, Randers MB, Sundstrup E, Jakobsen MD, Andersen LL, Suetta C, Aagaard P, Bangsbo J, Krustrup P. Effect of football or strength training on functional ability and physical performance in untrained old men. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(Suppl 1):76–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andersen TR, Schmidt JF, Pedersen MT, Krustrup P, Bangsbo J. The effects of 52 weeks of soccer or resistance training on body composition and muscle function in + 65-year-old healthy males—a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148236.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aslan A. Cardiovascular responses, perceived exertion and technical actions during small-sided recreational soccer: effects of pitch size and number of players. J Hum Kinet. 2013;38:95–105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bangsbo J, Hansen PR, Dvorak J, Krustrup P. Recreational football for disease prevention and treatment in untrained men: a narrative review examining cardiovascular health, lipid profile, body composition, muscle strength and functional capacity. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(9):568–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bangsbo J, Nielsen JJ, Mohr M, Randers MB, Krustrup BR, Brito J, Nybo L, Krustrup P. Performance enhancements and muscular adaptations of a 16-week recreational football intervention for untrained women. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(Suppl 1):24–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barene S, Holtermann A, Oseland H, Brekke O-L, Krustrup P. Effects on muscle strength, maximal jump height, flexibility and postural sway after soccer and Zumba exercise among female hospital employees: a 9-month randomised controlled trial. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(19):1849–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barene S, Krustrup P, Brekke OL, Holtermann A. Soccer and Zumba as health-promoting activities among female hospital employees: a 40-week cluster randomised intervention study. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(16):1539–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barene S, Krustrup P, Holtermann A. Effects of the workplace health promotion activities soccer and Zumba on muscle pain, work ability and perceived physical exertion among female hospital employees. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e115059.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bruun DM, Bjerre E, Krustrup P, Brasso K, Johansen C, Rørth M, Midtgaard J. Community-based recreational football: a novel approach to promote physical activity and quality of life in prostate cancer survivors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(6):5567–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bruun DM, Krustrup P, Hornstrup T, Uth J, Brasso K, Rørth M, Christensen JF, Midtgaard J. "All boys and men can play football": a qualitative investigation of recreational football in prostate cancer patients. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(Suppl 1):113–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Sousa MV, Fukui R, Krustrup P, Pereira RMR, Silva PRS, Rodrigues AC, de Andrade JL, Hernandez AJ, da Silva MER. Positive effects of football on fitness, lipid profile, and insulin resistance in Brazilian patients with type 2 diabetes. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(Suppl 1):57–655.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hansen PR, Andersen LJ, Rebelo AN, Brito J, Hornstrup T, Schmidt JF, Jackman SR, Mota J, Rêgo C, Oliveira J, Seabra A, Krustrup P. Cardiovascular effects of 3 months of football training in overweight children examined by comprehensive echocardiography: a pilot study. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(13):1432–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Helge EW, Aagaard P, Jakobsen MD, Sundstrup E, Randers MB, Karlsson MK, Krustrup P. Recreational football training decreases risk factors for bone fractures in untrained premenopausal women. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(Suppl 1):31–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Helge EW, Andersen TR, Schmidt JF, Jørgensen NR, Hornstrup T, Krustrup P, Bangsbo J. Recreational football improves bone mineral density and bone turnover marker profile in elderly men. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(Suppl 1):98–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herrero H, Salinero JJ, Del Coso J. Injuries among Spanish male amateur soccer players: a retrospective population study. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(1):78–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jackman SR, Scott S, Randers MB, Orntoft C, Blackwell J, Zar A, Helge EW, Mohr M, Krustrup P. Musculoskeletal health profile for elite female footballers vs untrained young women before and after 16 weeks of football training. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(13):1468–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jakobsen MD, Sundstrup E, Krustrup P, Aagaard P. The effect of recreational soccer training and running on postural balance in untrained men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(3):521–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. Global burden of diabetes, 1995–2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(9):1414–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Knoepfli-Lenzin C, Sennhauser C, Toigo M, Boutellier U, Bangsbo J, Krustrup P, Junge A, Dvorak J. Effects of a 12-week intervention period with football and running for habitually active men with mild hypertension. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(Suppl 1):72–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Krustrup P, Aagaard P, Nybo L, Petersen J, Mohr M, Bangsbo J. Recreational football as a health promoting activity: a topical review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(Suppl 1):1–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Krustrup P, Christensen JF, Randers MB, Pedersen H, Sundstrup E, Jakobsen MD, Krustrup BR, Nielsen JJ, Suetta C, Nybo L, Bangsbo J. Muscle adaptations and performance enhancements of soccer training for untrained men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;108(6):1247–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krustrup P, Dvorak J, Junge A, Bangsbo J. Executive summary: the health and fitness benefits of regular participation in small-sided football games. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(Suppl 1):132–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Krustrup P, Hansen PR, Andersen LJ, Jakobsen MD, Sundstrup E, Randers MB, Christiansen L, Helge EW, Pedersen MT, Søgaard P, Junge A, Dvorak J, Aagaard P, Bangsbo J. Long-term musculoskeletal and cardiac health effects of recreational football and running for premenopausal women. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(Suppl 1):58–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Krustrup P, Hansen PR, Nielsen CM, Larsen MN, Randers MB, Manniche V, Hansen L, Dvorak J, Bangsbo J. Structural and functional cardiac adaptations to a 10-week school-based football intervention for 9- to 10-year-old children. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(Suppl 1):4–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Krustrup P, Hansen PR, Randers MB, Nybo L, Martone D, Andersen LJ, Bune LT, Junge A, Bangsbo J. Beneficial effects of recreational football on the cardiovascular risk profile in untrained premenopausal women. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(Suppl 1):40–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krustrup P, Nielsen JJ, Krustrup BR, Christensen JF, Pedersen H, Randers MB, Aagaard P, Petersen AM, Nybo L, Bangsbo J. Recreational soccer is an effective health-promoting activity for untrained men. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(11):825–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Krustrup P, Randers MB, Andersen LJ, Jackman SR, Bangsbo J, Hansen PR. Soccer improves fitness and attenuates cardiovascular risk factors in hypertensive men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(3):553–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifkova R, Fagard R, Germano G, Grassi G, Heagerty AM, Kjeldsen SE, Laurent S, Narkiewicz K, Ruilope L, Rynkiewicz A, Schmieder RE, Struijker HAJ, Zanchetti A, Vahanian A, Camm J, De Caterina R, Dean V, Dickstein K, Filippatos G, Funck-Brentano C, Hellemans I, Kristensen SD, McGregor K, Sechtem U, Silber S, Tendera M, Widimsky P, Zamorano JL, Kjeldsen SE, Erdine S, Narkiewicz K, Kiowski W, Agabiti-Rosei E, Ambrosioni E, Cifkova R, Dominiczak A, Fagard R, Heagerty AM, Laurent S, Lindholm LH, Mancia G, Manolis A, Nilsson PM, Redon J, Viigimaa M, Filippatos G, Adamopoulos S, Agabiti-Rosei E, Ambrosioni E, Bertomeu V, Clement D, Erdine S, Farsang C, Gaita D, Kiowski W, Lip G, Mallion J-M, Manolis AJ, Nilsson PM, O'Brien E, Ponikowski P, Redon J, Ruschitzka F, Tamargo J, van Zwieten P, Viigimaa M, Waeber B, Williams B, Zamorano JL, The task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension, The task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology. 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2007;28(12):1462–536.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Milanović Z, Pantelić S, Sporiš G, Mohr M, Krustrup P. Health-related physical fitness in healthy untrained men: effects on VO2max, jump performance and flexibility of soccer and moderate-intensity continuous running. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0135319.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mohr M, Helge EW, Petersen LF, Lindenskov A, Weihe P, Mortensen J, Jørgensen NR, Krustrup P. Effects of soccer vs swim training on bone formation in sedentary middle-aged women. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015;115(12):2671–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mohr M, Lindenskov A, Holm PM, Nielsen HP, Mortensen J, Weihe P, Krustrup P. Football training improves cardiovascular health profile in sedentary, premenopausal hypertensive women. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(Suppl 1):36–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Noya Salces J, Gómez-Carmona PM, Gracia-Marco L, Moliner-Urdiales D, Sillero-Quintana M. Epidemiology of injuries in First Division Spanish football. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(13):1263–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Noya Salces J, Gomez-Carmona PM, Moliner-Urdiales D, Gracia-Marco L, Sillero-Quintana M. An examination of injuries in Spanish Professional Soccer League. J Sports Med Phys Fit. 2014;54(6):765–71.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pedersen MT, Randers MB, Skotte JH, Krustrup P. Recreational soccer can improve the reflex response to sudden trunk loading among untrained women. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(9):2621–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Randers MB, Andersen LJ, Orntoft C, Bendiksen M, Johansen L, Horton J, Hansen PR, Krustrup P. Cardiovascular health profile of elite female football players compared to untrained controls before and after short-term football training. J Sports Sci. 2013;31(13):1421–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Randers MB, Andersen TB, Rasmussen LS, Larsen MN, Krustrup P. Effect of game format on heart rate, activity profile, and player involvement in elite and recreational youth players. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(Suppl 1):17–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Randers MB, Nielsen JJ, Krustrup BR, Sundstrup E, Jakobsen MD, Nybo L, Dvorak J, Bangsbo J, Krustrup P. Positive performance and health effects of a football training program over 12 weeks can be maintained over a 1-year period with reduced training frequency. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(Suppl 1):80–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Randers MB, Nybo L, Petersen J, Nielsen JJ, Christiansen L, Bendiksen M, Brito J, Bangsbo J, Krustrup P. Activity profile and physiological response to football training for untrained males and females, elderly and youngsters: influence of the number of players. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(Suppl 1):14–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Randers MB, Petersen J, Andersen LJ, Krustrup BR, Hornstrup T, Nielsen JJ, Nordentoft M, Krustrup P. Short-term street soccer improves fitness and cardiovascular health status of homeless men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112(6):2097–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schmidt JF, Andersen TR, Andersen LJ, Randers MB, Hornstrup T, Hansen PR, Bangsbo J, Krustrup P. Cardiovascular function is better in veteran football players than age-matched untrained elderly healthy men. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(1):61–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schmidt JF, Andersen TR, Horton J, Brix J, Tarnow L, Krustrup P, Andersen LJ, Bangsbo J, Hansen PR. Soccer training improves cardiac function in men with type 2 diabetes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(12):2223–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schmidt JF, Hansen PR, Andersen TR, Andersen LJ, Hornstrup T, Krustrup P, Bangsbo J. Cardiovascular adaptations to 4 and 12 months of football or strength training in 65- to 75-year-old untrained men. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(Suppl 1):86–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Seabra AC, Seabra AF, Brito J, Krustrup P, Hansen PR, Mota J, Rebelo A, Rêgo C, Malina RM. Effects of a 5-month football program on perceived psychological status and body composition of overweight boys. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(Suppl 1):10–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sundstrup E, Jakobsen MD, Andersen JL, Randers MB, Petersen J, Suetta C, Aagaard P, Krustrup P. Muscle function and postural balance in lifelong trained male footballers compared with sedentary elderly men and youngsters. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(Suppl 1):90–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Thent ZC, Das S, Henry LJ. Role of exercise in the management of diabetes mellitus: the global scenario. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80436.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Uth J, Hornstrup T, Christensen JF, Christensen KB, Jørgensen NR, Helge EW, Schmidt JF, Brasso K, Helge JW, Jakobsen MD, Andersen LL, Rørth M, Midtgaard J, Krustrup P. Football training in men with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy: activity profile and short-term skeletal and postural balance adaptations. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(3):471–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Uth J, Hornstrup T, Christensen JF, Christensen KB, Jørgensen NR, Schmidt JF, Brasso K, Jakobsen MD, Sundstrup E, Andersen LL, Rørth M, Midtgaard J, Krustrup P, Helge EW. Efficacy of recreational football on bone health, body composition, and physical functioning in men with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy: 32-week follow-up of the FC prostate randomised controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27(4):1507–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Uth J, Hornstrup T, Schmidt JF, Christensen JF, Frandsen C, Christensen KB, Helge EW, Brasso K, Rørth M, Midtgaard J, Krustrup P. Football training improves lean body mass in men with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(Suppl 1):105–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Uth J, Schmidt JF, Christensen JF, Hornstrup T, Andersen LJ, Hansen PR, Christensen KB, Andersen LL, Helge EW, Brasso K, Rørth M, Krustrup P, Midtgaard J. Effects of recreational soccer in men with prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy: study protocol for the 'FC Prostate' randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2013;13(1):595.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Vicente-Rodriguez G, Jimenez-Ramirez J, Ara I, Serrano-Sanchez JA, Dorado C, JaL Calbet. Enhanced bone mass and physical fitness in prepubescent footballers. Bone. 2003;33(5):853–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Vlachopoulos D, Barker AR, Ubago-Guisado E, Fatouros IG, Knapp KM, Williams CA, Gracia-Marco L. Longitudinal adaptations of bone mass, geometry, and metabolism in adolescent male athletes: the PRO-BONE study. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(11):2269–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Vlachopoulos D, Barker AR, Ubago-Guisado E, Ortega FB, Krustrup P, Metcalf B, Castro Pinero J, Ruiz JR, Knapp KM, Williams CA, Moreno LA, Gracia-Marco L. The effect of 12-month participation in osteogenic and non-osteogenic sports on bone development in adolescent male athletes. The PRO-BONE study. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(4):404–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Vlachopoulos D, Barker AR, Williams CA, ArngríMsson SA, Knapp KM, Metcalf BS, Fatouros IG, Moreno LA, Gracia-Marco L. The impact of sport participation on bone mass and geometry in male adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(2):317–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Beijing Sport University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport SciencesUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  2. 2.PROmoting FITness and Health Through Physical Activity (PROFITH) Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport SciencesUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations