Advertisement

Tropical Ecology

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 271–280 | Cite as

Contribution of root-associated microbial communities on soil quality of Oak and Pine forests in the Himalayan ecosystem

  • Ashish Dhyani
  • Rahul Jain
  • Anita PandeyEmail author
Research Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Microorganisms, the fundamental components of all the ecosystems, play significant role in various biological processes such as biodegradation, mineralization and nutrient mobilization. The role of rhizosphere associated microbial interactions with reference to their contribution in enzymatic activities in two dominant forest tree species of Indian Himalaya, namely Oak (Quercus leucotrichophora) and Pine (Pinus roxburghii), is focused in the present study. Rhizosphere soil and root samples were collected in active and dormant seasons for two consecutive years from three selected sites. Root samples were studied for colonization by fungal associates as indicator of their ecological functions. Soil samples were analyzed for physico-chemical characteristics and enzymatic activities as a measure of soil health. Dark Septate Endophytes (DSE) and fungal colonization were observed in roots of both the tree species. Microscopic observations revealed high percentage of DSE and fungal hyphae (76–96 and 32–78%) in Oak while in Pine roots this percentage was 8–10 and 48–86%, respectively. Most of the soil physico-chemical parameters were found higher in Oak soil except total phosphorus content. Further, activity of acid phosphatase and dehydrogenase was recorded higher in Oak soil as compared to Pine soil. Pine soil samples showed high alkaline phosphatase and β-glucosidase activities. The study concludes that microbial associations and their activities in Oak and Pine soils appeared to define the specific properties of both forest types in terms of slow biodegradation in Pine and higher carbon sequestration in Oak.

Keywords

Fungal associates Indian Himalaya Oak-Pine Plant-microbe interactions Rhizosphere Soil enzymes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors gratefully acknowledge the Director and Scientific Advisory Committee of G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable Development, Almora, for supporting this study.

Funding

This study was funded by Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. Govt. of India.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

42965_2019_31_MOESM1_ESM.docx (20 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

References

  1. Ahmed A (2012) Analysis of forest vegetation in Ranikhet, Kumaon Himalayas, Uttarakhand, India. Indian J Funda Appl Life Sci 2(4):16–23Google Scholar
  2. Bahram M, Polme S, Koljalg U, Zarre S, Tedersoo L (2012) Regional and local patterns of ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity and community structure along an altitudinal gradient in the Hyrcanian forests of northern Iran. New Phytol 193:465–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandick AK, Dick RP (1999) Field management effects on soil enzyme activities. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1471–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonfante P, Genre A (2010) Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant–fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nat Commun 1:48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brzostek ER, Greco A, Drake JE, Finzi AC (2013) Root carbon inputs to the rhizosphere stimulate extracellular enzyme activity and increase nitrogen availability in temperate forest soils. Biogeochemistry 115:65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casida LE, Klein DA, Santoro T (1964) Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci 98:371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaurasia B, Pandey P, Palni LMS (2004) Occurrence of arbuscular mycorrhizae in the rhizosphere of Himalayan Yew (Taxus baccata L. subsp. wallichiana (Zucc.) Pilger)—a case study. In: Podila GK, Varma AK (eds) Basic research and applications of Mycorrhizae. IK, New Delhi, pp 26–35Google Scholar
  8. Chaurasia B, Pandey A, Palni LMS (2005) Distribution, colonization and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in rhododendrons of central Himalayan region of India. Forest Ecol Manag 207(3):315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chavez-Barcenas AT, Lua-Aldama J, Salmeron-Santiago IA, Silva-Adame MB, Garcia-Saucedo PA, Olalde-Portugal V (2013) A modified staining technique for the anatomical observation of mycorrhizal roots of woody trees. Afr J Microbiol Res 7(28):3589–3596Google Scholar
  10. Chen W, Koide RT, Adams TS, DeForest JL, Cheng L, Eissenstat DM (2016) Root morphology and mycorrhizal symbioses together shape nutrient foraging strategies of temperate trees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(31):8741–8746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dick RP, Breakwell DP, Turco RF (1996) Soil enzyme activities and biodiversity measurements as integrative microbiological indicators. In: Doran JW, Jones AJ (eds) USA: methods for assessing soil quality. Soil Science Society A special publication N° 49, Madison, pp 247–272Google Scholar
  12. Dinkelaker B, Marschner H (1992) In vivo demonstration of acid phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere of soil-grown plants. Plant Soil 144:199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duo A, Bruggmann R, Zoller S, Bernt M, Grunig C (2012) Mitochondrial genome evolution in species belonging to the Phialocephala fortinii s. l. Acephala applanata species complex. BMC Genom 13:166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garcia I, Mendoza R, Pomar MC (2012) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and dark septate endophytes under contrasting grazing modes in the Magellanic steppe of Tierra del Fuego. Agric Ecosyst Environ 155:194–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamilton CE, Bauerle TL (2012) A new currency for mutualism? Fungal endophytes alter antioxidant activity in hosts responding to drought. Fung Divers.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-012-0156 Google Scholar
  16. Huang W, Liu J, Zhou G, Zhang D, Deng Q (2011) Effects of precipitation on soil acid phosphatase activity in three successional forests in southern China. Biogeosciences 8:1901–1910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jain R, Pandey A (2016) Soil enzymes and microbial endophytes as indicators of climate variation along an altitudinal gradient with respect to wheat rhizosphere under mountain ecosystem. Rhizosphere 2:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Joshi G, Negi GCS (2015) Physico-chemical properties along soil profiles of two dominant forest types in Western Himalaya. Curr Sci 109(4):798–803Google Scholar
  19. Jumpponen A (2001) Dark septate endophytes—are they mycorrhizal? Mycorrhiza 11:207–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jumpponen A, Jones KL, Mattox JD, Yaege C (2010) Massively parallel 454-sequencing of fungal communities in Quercus spp. ectomycorrhizas indicates seasonal dynamics in urban and rural sites. Mol Ecol 19(1):41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaushik D, Kaushik P, Kumar A, Rana AC, Sharma C, Aneja KR (2013) GC-MS analysis and antimicrobial activity of essential oil of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. From Northern India. J Essent Oil Bear Pl 16:563–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim S, Li G, Han SH, Kim HJ, Kim C, Lee ST, Son Y (2018) Thinning affects microbial biomass without changing enzyme activity in the soil of Pinus densiflora Sieb. et Zucc. forests after 7 years. Ann Forest Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-018-0690-1 Google Scholar
  23. Knapp DG, Kovács GM (2016) Interspecific metabolic diversity of root-colonizing endophytic fungi revealed by enzyme activity tests. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 92(12):190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumar A, Singh S, Pandey A (2009) General microflora, arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization and occurrence of endophytes in rhizosphere of two age groups of Ginkgo biloba L. of Indian central Himalaya. Indian J Microbiol 49:134–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li Z, Yony-liang C, Ting-zhen Y (2000) Ecological distribution and seasonal change of soil microorganisms in pure and mixed plantations. J For Res 11(2):106–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li X, He X, Hou L, Ren Y, Wang S, Su F (2018) Dark septate endophytes isolated from a xerophyte plant promote the growth of Ammopiptanthus mongolicus under drought condition. Sci Rep 8(1):7896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lukešová T, Kohout P, Větrovský T, Vohník M (2015) The potential of dark septate endophytes to form root symbioses with ectomycorrhizal and ericoid mycorrhizal middle European Forest Plants. PLoS One.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124752 Google Scholar
  28. Makoi JHJR, Ndakidemi PA (2008) Selected soil enzymes: examples of their potential roles in the ecosystem. Afr J Biotechnol 7(3):181–191Google Scholar
  29. Mandyam K, Jumpponen A (2005) Seeking the elusive function of the root-colonising dark septate endophytic fungi. Stud Mycol 53:173–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Myers RT, Zak DR, White DC, Peacock A (2001) Landscape-level patterns of microbial community composition and substrate use in upland forest ecosystems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nadiaye EL, Sandeno JM, McGrath D, Dick RP (2000) Integrative biological indicators for detecting change in soil quality. Am J Alt Agric 15:26–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Newsham KK (2011) A meta-analysis of plant responses to dark septate root endophytes. New Phytol 190:783–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Olsen SR, Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of Soil Analysis: chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 403–430Google Scholar
  34. Pan Y, McCullough K, Hollinger DY (2018) Forest biodiversity, relationships to structural and functional attributes, and stability in New England forests. For Ecosyst.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-017-0089-8 Google Scholar
  35. Pandey A (2019) Are dark septate endophytes bioindicators of climate in mountain ecosystems? Rhizosphere.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2019.01.001 Google Scholar
  36. Pandey A, Palni LMS (2007) The rhizosphere effect in trees of the Indian Central Himalaya with special reference to altitude. Appl Ecol Env Res 5(1):93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pandey A, Dhakar K, Jain R, Pandey N, Gupta VK, Kooliyottil R, Dhyani A, Malviya MK, Adhikari P (2018) Cold adapted fungi from Indian Himalaya: untapped source for bioprospecting. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci 22:22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-018-1002-0 Google Scholar
  38. Parkinson JA, Allen SE (1975) A wet digestion procedure suitable for the determination of nitrogen and mineral nutrients in biological material. Commun Soil Sci Plan 6:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paudel S, Sah JP (2003) Physico-chemical characters of soil in tropical sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn.) forests in eastern Nepal. Himalayan J Sci 1(2):107–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Quilchano C, Maranon T (2002) Dehydrogenase activity in Mediterranean forest soils. Biol Fert Soils 35:102–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Quiza L, St-Arnaud M, Yergeau E (2015) Harnessing phytomicrobiome signaling for rhizosphere microbiome engineering. Front Plant Sci 6:507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rathod D, Dar M, Gade A, Shrivastava RB, Rai M, Varma A (2013) Microbial endophytes: progress and challenges. In: Chandra S, Lata H, Varma A (eds) Biotechnology for medicinal plants. Springer, Berlin, pp 101–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rodriguez R, White JF Jr, Arnold AE, Redman RS (2009) Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytol 182:314–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schouteden N, De Waele D, Panis B, Vos CM (2015) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for the biocontrol of plant-parasitic nematodes: a review of the mechanisms involved. Front Microbiol 6:1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sebastiana M, Vieira B, Lino-Neto T, Monteiro F, Figueiredo A, Sousa L, Pais MS, Tavares R, Paulo OS (2014) Oak root response to Ectomycorrhizal symbiosis establishment: RNA-Seq derived transcript identification and expression profiling. PLoS One 9(5):e98376.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sharma JC, Sharma Y (2004) Effect of forest ecosystem on the soil property—a review. Agric Rev 25(1):6–28Google Scholar
  47. Simard SW, Perry DA, Jones MD, Myrold DD, Durall DM, Molina R (1997) Net transfer of carbon between ectomycorrhizal tree species in the field. Nature 388:579–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Singh G, Padalia H, Rai ID, Bharti RR, Rawat GS (2016) Spatial extent and conservation status of Banj oak (Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus) forests in Uttarakhand, Western Himalaya. Trop Ecol 57(2):255–262Google Scholar
  49. Smith SE, Read DJ (2008) The symbionts forming arbuscular mycorrhizas. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis 2:13–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM (1969) Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem 1:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tarafdar JC, Marschner H (1994) Efficiency of VAM hyphae in utilisation of organic phosphorus by wheat plants. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 40(4):593–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tiwari SP, Kumar P, Yadav D, Chauhan DK (2013) Comparative morphological, epidermal, and anatomical studies of Pinus roxburghii needles at different altitudes in the North-West Indian Himalayas. Turk J Bot 37(1):65–73Google Scholar
  53. Van der Heijden MGA, Martin M, Selosse MA, Sanders IR (2015) Mycorrhizal ecology and evolution: the past, the present, and the future. New Phytol 205:1406–1423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Veresoglou SD, Rillig MC (2012) Suppression of fungal and nematode plant pathogens through arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Biol Lett 8(2):214–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Waldrop MP, Zak DR, Sinnsabaugh RL, Gallo M, Lauber C (2004) Nitrogen deposition modifies soil carbon storage through changes in microbial enzymatic activity. Ecol App 14(4):1172–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic soil titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wu B, Maruyama H, Teramoto M, Hougetsu T (2012) Structural and functional interactions between extraradical mycelia of ectomycorrhizal Pisolithus isolates. New Phytol 194:1070–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wu Q-S, Li Y, Zou Y-N, He X-H (2015) Arbuscular mycorrhiza mediates glomalin-related soil protein production and soil enzyme activities in the rhizosphere of trifoliate orange grown under different P levels. Mycorrhiza 25:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Tropical Ecology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Environmental Assessment and Climate ChangeG.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable DevelopmentAlmoraIndia
  2. 2.Biotechnology DivisionCSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource TechnologyPalampurIndia

Personalised recommendations