Transfer learning for pavement performance prediction
- 3 Downloads
Accurate pavement performance prediction models are essential to ensure optimal allocation of resources in maintenance management. These models are developed using inventory and monitoring data regarding pavement structure, climate, traffic, and condition.
However, numerous road agencies have limited pavement data. Due to the inexistence of historical data, data collection frequency, and/or quality issues, the amount of data available for the development of performance models is reduced. As a result, the resource allocati on process is significantly undermined.
This paper proposes a transfer learning approach to develop pavement performance prediction models in limited data contexts. The proposed transfer learning approach is based on a boosting algorithm. In particular, a modified version of the popular TrAdaBoost learning algorithm was used.
To test the proposed transfer learning approach, a case study was developed using data from the Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) database and from the Portuguese road administration database.
The results of this work show that it is possible to develop accurate performance prediction models in limited data contexts when a transfer learning approach is applied. All the models resulting from this approach outperformed baseline models, especially in what regards long-term forecasts. The results also showed that the transfer learning models perform consistently over different time frames, with minor performance losses from one-step to multi-step forecasts.
The findings of this study should be of interest to road agencies facing limited data contexts and aiming to develop accurate prediction models that can improve their pavement management practice.
KeywordsTransfer learning Pavement performance models International Roughness Index (IRI) Machine learning Pavement Management Systems (PMS) Predictive maintenance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) [grant number SFRH/BD/129907/2017].
- S. Gowda, S. Jain, K. S. Patil, K. P. Biligiri, B. E. Prabhakar, Development of a Budget-Prioritized Pavement Management System based on Engineering Criteria, Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 8 (3) (2015) 206–220. https://doi.org/10.6135/ijprt.org.tw/2015.8(3).206 Google Scholar
- T.A. Dawson, Evaluation of pavement management data and analysis of treatment effectiveness using multi-level treatment transition matrices, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA, 2012.Google Scholar
- G. Y. Baladi, S. W. Haider, K. Chatti, L. Galehouse, T. A. Dawson, C. M. Dean, R. Muscott, N. Tecca, M. McClosky, Optimization of and Maximizing the Benefits from Pavement Management Data Collection, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C, USA, 2009.Google Scholar
- L.M. Pierce, G. McGovern, K.A. Zimmerman, Practical guide for quality management of pavement condition data collection, US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C, USA, 2013.Google Scholar
- R.L. Schmitt, S. Owusu-Ababio, K.D. Denn, Database Development for an HMA Pavement Performance Analysis System.No. MRUTC 07-11. Midwest Regional University Transportation Center, College of Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 2008.Google Scholar
- A. Ayed, Development of Empirical and Mechanistic Empirical performance Models at Project and Network Levels, (PhD Thesis), University of Waterloo, Canada, 2016.Google Scholar
- H.C. Shin, H.R. Roth, M. Gao, L. Lu, Z. Xu, I. Nogues, J. Yao, D. Mollura, R.M. Summers. Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: CNN architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning, In IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 35 (5) (2016) 1285–1298. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2016.2528162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- K. Gopalakrishnan, S.K. Khaitan, A. Choudhary, A. Agrawal. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks with transfer learning for computer vision-based data-driven pavement distress detection, Construction and Building Materials 157 (2017) 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- K. Zhang, H.D. Cheng, B. Zhang B. Unified approach to pavement crack and sealed crack detection using preclassification based on transfer learning, J. Comput. Civil Eng. 32 (2) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000736
- K. Gopalakrishnan, H. Gholami, A. Vidyadharan, A. Choudhary, A. Agrawal, Crack damage detection in unmanned aerial vehicle images of civil infrastructure using pre-trained deep learning model, Int. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 8 (1) (2018) 1–4. https://doi.org/10.7708/ijtte.2018.8(1).01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- H. Drucker, Improving regressors using boosting techniques, In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning, Nashville, USA, 1997, pp. 107–115.Google Scholar
- D. Pardoe, P. Stone, Boosting for regression transfer, In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning, Haifa, Israel, 2010, pp. 863–870.Google Scholar
- A. Blum, T. Mitchell, Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training, In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, Madison, USA, 1998, pp. 92–100.Google Scholar
- M. Belkin, P. Niyogi, V. Sindhwani, Manifold regularization: A geometric framework for learning from labeled and unlabeled examples. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7 (Nov) (2006) 2399–434.Google Scholar
- X. Zhu, Z. Ghahramani, Learning from labeled and unlabeled data with label propagation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, 2002.Google Scholar
- M.W. Sayers, S.M. Karamihas, The Little Book of Profiling, University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 1998.Google Scholar
- K. Golabi, P. Pereira, Innovative pavement management and planning system for road network of Portugal. J. Infrastructure Syst. 9 (2) (2003) 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2003)9:2(75) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- L. Picado-Santos, A. Ferreira, Development and implementation of a new pavement management system. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Pavements and Technological Control, Iowa City, USA, 2007, pp. 433–438.Google Scholar
- L. Picado-Santos, A. Ferreira, Contributions to the development of the Portuguese road administration's pavement management system, In Proceedings of the 3rd European Pavement and Asset Management Conference 1138, Coimbra, Portugal, 2008, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
- A. Luz, L.G. Picado-Santos, Contribution to the quality index model in the Description of the national road network, Universidade de Lisboa, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal, 2011.Google Scholar
- P. Marcelino, M. L. Antunes, E. Fortunato, Current international practices on pavement condition assessment, In Pavement and Asset Management: Proceedings of the World Conference on Pavement and Asset Management (WCPAM 2017), Milan, Italy, 2017.Google Scholar
- S. Nassiri, M. H. Shafiee, A. Bayat, Development of roughness prediction models using Alberta transportation's pavement management system, Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 6 (6) (2013) 714–720. https://doi.org/10.6135/ijprt.org.tw/2013.6(6).714 Google Scholar
- Federal Highway Administration, National Performance Management Measures, Federal Register 80 (2), Washington, D.C, USA, 2015, pp. 326–393.Google Scholar
- J. Osborne, Notes on the use of data transformations. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 8(1) (2002) 42–50.Google Scholar
- R.W. Perera, S.D. Kohn, Issues in pavement smoothness, National Research Council, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C., USA, 2002.Google Scholar