Robust Performance Rate Control to Enhance MANET Networks Routing Issue

  • Ali GaraaghajiEmail author
  • Alireza Alfi
Original Article


Wireless mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) technology is defined as a group of wireless mobile hosts forming a network without any infrastructure or centralized administration. This paper addresses robust performance control on routing problem in the MANET based on path calculation function. A novel routing algorithm is proposed in terms of rate control and path calculation function for enhancing packet delivery fraction and end-to-end delay. The key idea is to construct a control algorithm for reducing the number of route reconstruction in the network. Using the proposed control algorithm, the multiple routes are efficiently selected, resulting in higher packet delivery ratio, lower routing packets, and lower end-to-end delay. Results show the capability of the proposed algorithm.


Route control Packet delivery fraction Mobile ad-hoc network End-to-end delay 

List of Symbols


Number of links


Current node position


Destination node in routing protocol


Order of time calculation function


Real parameters of the time calculation function


Destination of routing


Founded routing path


New destination


Prediction function



  1. 1.
    Mohapatra P, Krishnamurthy S (2005) Ad-Hoc networks technology and protocols. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–58Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li L, Liu R (2010) Securing cluster-based Ad-Hoc networks with. Ieee Trans Wirel Commun 9(10):75–93Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang Z, Karande S, Sadjadpour H, Garcia-Luna-Aceves JJ (2011) On the multicast capacity of wireless Ad-Hoc networks. J Commun Netw 13(5):123–131Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weixia Z, Hui L, Ye W (2017) A new hierarchical beam search algorithm for wireless ad hoc networks in multipath channel scenario. Ad Hoc Netw 58:105–111Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yu YT, Tandiono C, Li X, Lu Y, Sanadidi MY, Gerla M (2014) ICAN: information-centric context-aware ad-hoc network. In: proceedings of international conference on computing, networking and communications, pp. 578–582Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jhaveri RH, Patel NM (2015) Mobile Ad-hoc networking with AODV: a review. Int J Next Generat Comput 6(3):165–191Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perkins C, Belding-Royer E, Das S (2010) Ad hoc On-demand distance vector (AODV) routing. Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-aodv-13.txt, Mobile Ad Hoc Networking Working Group, pp 6–18Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grassi G, Pesavento D, Pau G, uyyuru R, Wakikawa R, Zhang L (2014) VANET via named data networking. In: IEEE conference on computer communication workshops, pp. 410–415Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kumar YA, Sachin T (2016) A tree based multicast routing protocol using reliable neighbor node for wireless mobile ad-hoc networks. In: 4th international conference on frontiers in intelligent computing: theory and applications, pp. 455–465Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jiang D, Xu Z, Li W, Chen Z (2015) Network coding-based energy-efficient multicast routing algorithm for multi-hop wireless networks. J Syst Softw 104:152–165Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Das SK, Tripathi S (2015) Energy efficient routing protocol for manet based on vague set measurement technique. Procedia Comput Sci 58:348–355Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang X, Song X (2015) New clustering routing method based on PECE for WSN. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw 1:1–13Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tahir A, Abid SA, Shah N (2017) Logical clusters in a DHT-paradigm for scalable routing in MANETs. Comput Netw 128:142–153Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang T, Zhang J (2018) A kind of effective data aggregating method based on compressive sensing for wireless sensor network. URASIP J Wirel Commun Netw 159:1–15Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang T (2018) Novel optimized link state routing protocol based on quantum genetic strategy for mobile learning. J Netw Comput Appl 122:37–49Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang X (2012) Design and implementation of embedded uninterruptible power supply system (EUPSS) for web-based mobile application. Enterp Inf Syst 6(4):473–489Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhou S (2018) A low duty cycle efficient MAC protocol based on self-adaption and predictive strategy. Mob Netw Appl 23(4):828–839Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang X, Song X (2014) A novel approach to mapped correlation of ID for RFID anticollision. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 7(4):741–748MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang D, Zhang T, Chen C, Cui YY (2018) New method of energy efficient subcarrier allocation based on evolutionary game theory. Mob Netw Appl. Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu S (2018) Novel dynamic source routing protocol (DSR) based on genetic algorithm bacterial foraging optimization (GA-BFO). Int J Commun Syst 31(18):1–20Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz E, Nabrdalik F (2017) Secure low energy AODV protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: 27th international telecommunication networks and applications conferenceGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kishore G, Beniwal NS, Mishra S (2014) Study of compensation of variable delay in communication link using communication disturbance observer (CDOB) and network disturbance (ND). Int J Sci Res Dev 2:143–154Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Muchtar F, Abdullah A, Hassan S, Masud F (2018) Energy conservation strategies in Host Centric Networking based MANET: A review. J Netw Comput Appl 111:77–98Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Farkhana M, Hanan A, Suhaidi H, Tajudin K, Zuhairi Z (2019) Energy conservation of content routing through wireless broadcast control in NDN based MANET: a review. J Netw Comput Appl 131:109–132Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Song XD, Wang X (2015) Extended AODV routing method based on distributed minimum transmission (DMT) for WSN. Int J Electron Commun 69(1):371–381Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang D, Li G, Zheng K (2014) An energy-balanced routing method based on forward aware factor for wireless sensor network. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 10(1):766–773Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zheng K, Zhang T (2015) A novel multicast routing method with minimum transmission for WSN of cloud computing service. Soft Comput 19:1817–1827Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu S, Zhang T (2017) Novel unequal clustering routing protocol considering energy balancing based on network partition and distance for mobile education. J Netw Comput Appl 88(15):1–9Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kanellopoulos D (2018) Congestion control for MANETs: an overview. ICT Express. Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tahir A, Abid SA, Shah N (2017) Logical clusters in a DHT-Paradigm for scalable routing in MANETs. Comput Netw 128:142–153Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Niu HL, Liu S (2017) Novel PEECR-based clustering routing approach. Soft Comput 21(24):7313–7323Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tang Y (2019) Novel reliable routing method for engineering of internet of vehicles based on graph theory. Eng Comput 36(1):226–247Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang D, Zhang T, Liu X (2018) Novel self adaptive routing service algorithm for application of VANET. Appl Intell 49(5):1866–1879Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang D, Ge H (2018) New multi-hop clustering algorithm for vehicular Ad Hoc networks. IEEE Trans Intell Trans Syst 7:1–14Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Liu S (2019) Dynamic analysis for the average shortest path length of mobile Ad Hoc networks under random failure scenarios. IEEE Access 7:21343–21358Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gao J (2019) Novel approach of distributed and adaptive trust metrics for MANET. Wirel Netw 1:1–17Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang D (2012) A new approach and system for attentive mobile learning based on seamless migration. Appl Intell 36(1):75–89Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zheng K, Zhao D (2016) Novel quick start (QS) method for optimization of TCP. Wirel Netw 22(1):211–222Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhao C (2012) A new medium access control protocol based on perceived data reliability and spatial correlation in wireless sensor network. Comput Electr Eng 38(3):694–702Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lu L, Zou Y, Niu Y (2016) Event-driven robust output feedback control for constrained linear systems via model predictive control method. Circ Syst Signal Process 1:1–16zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kang D (2016) Orgma source code. Accessed Feb 2018

Copyright information

© The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical and Robotic EngineeringShahrood University of TechnologyShahroodIran

Personalised recommendations