Advertisement

Preparation of pitch-based activated carbon with surface-treated fly ash for SO2 gas removal

  • Min Il Kim
  • Ji Sun ImEmail author
  • Sang Wan Seo
  • Jong Hoon Cho
  • Young-Seak LeeEmail author
  • Sangjin Kim
Original Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Fly ash consists of various metal oxides which can remove SO2 gas by the catalyst effect. When fly ash is added in the preparation process of pitch-based activated carbon, the pitch particles aggregate and fly ash is embedded in the activated carbon. To increase SO2 gas removal performance, activated carbon was prepared by surface-treated fly ash and petroleum-based pitch. Carboxyl groups were introduced into the fly ash by malic acid treatment. The introduced carboxyl groups acted as an activation agent to create micropore around the fly ash, and created micropores were exposed to the fly ash outside of the activated carbon. The exposed fly ash increased removal amount of SO2 gas by a catalytic effect of the metal oxides. The SO2 gas removal performance improved by 34% because of the catalyst effect of the exposed fly ash and improvement in the micropore structure in the activated carbon.

Keywords

Pitch Fly ash Activated carbon Surface treatment SO2 gas removal 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea (no. 20181110200070, Functional porous composite for mitigating air pollutant by using coal combustion products) and also supported by the Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KRICT) [no. KK1913-10, Fabrication of petroleum pitch-based carbon absorbent for removal of hazardous air pollutants (SOx/NOx)].

References

  1. 1.
    Ma X, Li J, Rankin MA, Croll LM, Dahn JR (2017) Highly porous MnOx prepared from Mn(C2O4)·3H2O as an adsorbent for the removal of SO2 and NH3. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 244:192–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.10.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barpaga D, LeVan MD (2016) Functionalization of carbon silica composites with active metal sites for NH3 and SO2 adsorption. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 221:197–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.09.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vo HT, Cho SH, Lee U, Jae J, Kim H, Lee H (2019) Reversible absorption of SO2 with alkyl-anilines: the effects of alkyl group on aniline and water. J Ind Eng Chem 69:338–344.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.09.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu Z, Qiu J, Liu H, Tan Z, Yan Z, Zhang M, Zeng H, Yang H (2012) Effects of SO2 and NO on removal of VOCs from simulated flue gas by using activated carbon fibers at low temperatures. J Fuel Chem Technol 40:93–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5813(12)60008-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou X, Yi H, Tang X, Deng H, Liu H (2012) Thermodynamics for the adsorption of SO2, NO and CO2 from flue gas on activated carbon fiber. Chem Eng J 200–202:399–404.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boualem T, Debab A, Martínez de Yuso A, Izquierdo MT (2014) Activated carbons obtained from sewage sludge by chemical activation: gas-phase environmental applications. J Environ Manag 140:145–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.03.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim D, Cheon J, Kim J, Hwang D, Hong I, Kwon OH, Park WH, Cho D (2017) Extraction and characterization of lignin from black liquor and preparation of biomass-based activated carbon therefrom. Carbon Lett 22:81–88.  https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2017.22.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Islam MS, Ang BC, Gharehkhani S, Afifi ABM (2016) Adsorption capability of activated carbon synthesized from coconut shell. Carbon Lett 20:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2016.20.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim JG, Kim JH, Im JS, Lee YS, Bae TS (2018) Empirical study of petroleum-based pitch production via pressure- and temperature-controlled thermal reactions. J Ind Eng Chem 62:176–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.12.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seo SW, Choi YJ, Kim JH, Cho JH, Lee YS, Im JS (2019) Micropore-structured activated carbon prepared by waste PET/petroleum-based pitch. Carbon Lett 29:385–392.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-019-00028-w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim JG, Kim JH, Song BJ, Jeon YP, Lee CW, Lee WS, Im JS (2016) Characterization of pitch derived from pyrolyzed fuel oil using TLC-FID and MALDI-TOF. Fuel 167:25–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.11.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Calzada LA, Castellanos R, García LA, Klimova TE (2019) TiO2, SnO2 and ZnO catalysts supported on mesoporous SBA-15 versus unsupported nanopowders in photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 285:247–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.05.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duan H, Yang Y, Patel J, Burke N, Zhai Y, Webley PA, Chen D, Long M (2018) The effect of the modification methods on the catalytic performance of activated carbon supported CuO–ZnO catalysts. Carbon Lett 25:33–42.  https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2018.25.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blissett RS, Rowson NA (2012) A review of the multi-component utilisation of coal fly ash. Fuel 97:1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.03.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Behin J, Bukhari SS, Kazemian H, Rohani S (2016) Developing a zero liquid discharge process for zeolitization of coal fly ash to synthetic NaP zeolite. Fuel 171:195–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.12.073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aldahri T, Behin J, Kazemian H, Rohani S (2017) Effect of microwave irradiation on crystal growth of zeolitized coal fly ash with different solid/liquid ratios. Adv Powder Technol 28:2865–2874.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2017.08.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Davini P (2003) Behaviour of activated carbons obtained from mixtures of oil-fired fly ash and oil refining pitch. Carbon 41:1559–1565.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00104-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hamzehlouyan T, Sampara CS, Li J, Kumar A, Epling WS (2016) Kinetic study of adsorption and desorption of SO2 over γ-Al2O3 and Pt/γ-Al2O3. Appl Catal B-Environ 181:587–598.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim JG, Kim JH, Song BJ, Lee CW, Im JS (2016) Synthesis and its characterization of pitch from pyrolyzed fuel oil (PFO). J Ind Eng Chem 36:293–297.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.02.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ghafoor S, Ata S (2017) Synthesis of carboxyl-modified Fe3O4@SiO2 nanoparticles and their utilization for the remediation of cadmium and nickel from aqueous solution. J Chil Chem Soc 62:3588–3592.  https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-97072017000303588 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bai BC, Lee HU, Lee CW, Lee YS, Im JS (2016) N2 plasma treatment on activated carbon fibers for toxic gas removal: mechanism study by electrochemical investigation. Chem Eng J 306:260–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.07.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Deng S, Shu Y, Li S, Tian G, Huang J, Zhang F (2016) Chemical forms of the fluorine, chlorine, oxygen and carbon in coal fly ash and their correlations with mercury retention. J Hazard Mater 301:400–406.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.09.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xue X, Liu YL, Dai JG, Poon CS, Zhang WD, Zhang P (2018) Inhibiting efflorescence formation on fly ash-based geopolymer via silane surface modification. Cem Concr Compos 94:43–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.08.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Asl SMH, Ghadi A, Baei MS, Javadian H, Maghsudi M, Kazemian H (2018) Porous catalysts fabricated from coal fly ash as cost-effective alternatives for industrial applications: a review. Fuel 217:320–342.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee JM, Kim SJ, Kim JW, Kang PH, Nho YC, Lee YS (2009) A high resolution XPS study of sidewall functionalized MWCNTs by fluorination. J Ind Eng Chem 15:66–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2008.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Atzei D, Fantauzzi M, Rossi A, Fermo P, Piazzalunga A, Valli G, Vecchi R (2014) Surface chemical characterization of PM10samples by XPS. Appl Surf Sci 307:120–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.03.178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wal RLV, Bryg VM, Hays MD (2011) XPS analysis of combustion aerosols for chemical composition, surface chemistry, and carbon chemical state. Anal Chem 83:1924–1930.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac102365s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li X, Qiu Y (2012) The effect of plasma pre-treatment on NaHCO3 desizing of blended sizes on cotton fabrics. Appl Surf Sci 258:4939–4944.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.01.124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pale-Grosdemange C, Simon ES, Prime KL, Whitesides GM (1991) Formation of self-assembled monolayers by chemisorption of derivatives of oligo(ethylene glycol) of structure HS(CH2)11(OCH2CH2)mOH on gold. J Am Chem Soc 113:12–20.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00001a002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Uvdal K, Bodӧ P, Liedberg B (1991) l-Cysteine adsorbed on gold and copper: an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study. J Colloid Interface Sci 149:162–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(92)90401-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Qiao W, Ling L, Zha Q, Liu L (1997) Preparation of a pitch-based activated carbon with a high specific surface area. J Mater Sci 32:4447–4453.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018600729419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhu Y, Miao Y, Li H (2019) Enhancement effect of ordered hierarchical pore configuration on SO2 adsorption and desorption process. Process 7(3):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7030173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Serna-Guerrero R, Sayari A (2010) Modeling adsorption of CO2 on amine-functionalized mesoporous silica. 2: kinetics and breakthrough curves. Chem Eng J 161:182–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.04.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Aksu Z, Gönen F (2004) Biosorption of phenol by immobilized activated sludge in a continuous packed bed: prediction of breakthrough curves. Process Biochem 39:599–613.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00132-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Corro G, Velasco A, Montiel R (2001) SO2 reactions over γ-Al2O3, Pt/γ-Al2O3, Sn/γ-Al2O3 and Pt-Sn/γ-Al2O3. Catal Commun 2:369–374.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1566-7367(01)00062-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Huang Y, Yang Y, Hu H, Xu M, Liu H, Li X, Wang X, Yao H (2019) A deep insight into arsenic adsorption over γ-Al2O3 in the presence of SO2/NO. Proc Combust Inst 37:2951–2957.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Carbon Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Carbon Industry Frontier Research CenterKorea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KRICT)DaejeonRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Advanced Materials and Chemical EngineeringUniversity of Science and Technology (UST)DaejeonRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied ChemistryChungnam National UniversityDaejeonRepublic of Korea
  4. 4.Gyeongbuk Science and Technology Promotion CenterGumi Electronics and Information Technology Research Institute (GERI)GumiRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations