Solid Waste Management: Planning and Implementation of a Cultural Design

  • Carla Morello Hayashi
  • Thomas Anatol da Rocha Woelz
  • Camila Muchon de MeloEmail author
Original Paper


The field of behavior analysis has long been known for its advances in strategies to intervene on individual behavior; however, many behavior analysts have also been developing strategies to arrange contingencies for cultural practices. The cultural practices of interest are those that represent good prospects for the survival of humankind. Solid waste management, for example, has been an important target of interventions. Interventions can be designed to change behaviors related to the inappropriate disposal of waste, which otherwise generates public health problems. The current study describes a case of planning and applying a cultural design to foster behaviors that make up an adequate cultural practice of solid waste management with children who attended a nongovernmental organization. The cultural design emphasized maintaining the practice for the long term. Two studies were conducted. The 1st study consisted of planning a cultural design, supported by a guide developed by Carrara et al. (“Desenvolvimento de guia e fluxograma como suporte para delineamentos culturais [Guide and Flow-Chart Development as Support for Cultural Designs],” Acta Comportamentalia, 21[1], 99–119, 2013). Researchers surveyed the demands related to natural resources management in the community. Then, they investigated the cultural practice of inadequate solid waste management, which was identified as the most urgent practice to be modified. Based on the data and analysis, interventions were planned to modify the target practice. The interventions included changes in the environment, instructions and instruction-related activities, an educational game, and a practical activity (composting) focused on maintaining the practice without the need for arbitrary reinforcers. The previously planned interventions were then implemented in the 2nd study. The results suggest that the strategies employed were effective in establishing the target practices, and the follow-up data indicated that the behaviors were maintained.


applied behavior analysis cultural design cultural planning cultural practice solid waste management sustainability 


Author Note

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and Dr. Traci Cihon for the careful editing of the manuscript.


This research did not receive any funding.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This research was submitted and approved by the Ethics Committee on Research involving Human Beings from Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Brazil, under the certificate number (CAAE) 5315 3515.6.0000.5231.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

The informed consent form was sent to parents or guardians, informing them about the study and requesting permission for their children’s participation


  1. Andery, M. A. P. A., Micheletto, N., & Sério, T. M. A. P. (2005). A análise de fenômenos sociais: Esboçando uma proposta para a identificação de contingências entrelaçadas e metacontingências [Analysis of social phenomena: Identifying interlocking contingencies and metacontingencies]. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento, 1(2), 149–165. Scholar
  2. Austin, J., Hatfield, D. B., Grindle, A. C., & Bailey, J. S. (1993). Increasing recycling in office environments: The effects of specific, informative cues. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26(2), 247–253. Scholar
  3. Ayres, M., Ayres Jr., M., Ayres, D. L., & dos Santos, A. A. (2007). BioEstat (5.0) [Software]. Tefé, Amazonas: Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá.Google Scholar
  4. Bacon-Prue, A., Blount, R., Pickering, D., & Drabman, R. (1980). An evaluation of three litter control procedures—trash receptacles, paid workers, and the marked item technique. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13(1), 165–170. Scholar
  5. Brothers, K. J., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1994). Office paper recycling: A function of container proximity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(1), 153–160. Scholar
  6. Burgess, R. L., Clark, R. N., & Hendee, J. C. (1971). An experimental analysis of anti-litter procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4(2), 71–75. Scholar
  7. Burn, S. M., & Oskamp, S. (1986). Increasing community recycling with persuasive communication and public commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 29–41. Scholar
  8. Carrara, K. (2008). Entre a utopia e o cotidiano: Uma análise de estratégias viáveis nos delineamentos culturais [Between utopia and everyday life: An analysis of viable strategies in cultural designs]. Revista Psicolog, 1(1), 42–54 Retrieved from Scholar
  9. Carrara, K., de Souza, V. B., Oliveira, D. R., Orti, N. P., Lourencetti, L. A., & Lopes, F. R. (2013). Desenvolvimento de guia e fluxograma como suporte para delineamentos culturais [Guide and flow-chart development as support for cultural designs]. Acta Comportamentalia, 21(1), 99–119 Retrieved from Scholar
  10. Carrara, K., & Zilio, D. (2015). Análise comportamental da cultural: Contingência ou metacontingência como unidade de análise? [Behavioral analysis culture: Contingency or metacontingency as the unit of analysis?]. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento, 11(2), 135–146. Scholar
  11. Chapman, C., & Risley, T. R. (1974). Anti-litter procedures in an urban high-density area. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7(3), 377–383. Scholar
  12. Clark, R. N., Burgess, R. L., & Hendee, J. C. (1972). The development of anti-litter behavior in a forest campground. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5(1), 1–51. Scholar
  13. da Silva, F. B., & Carrara, K. (2015). Implicações de estratégias molares/moleculares na análise comportamental da cultura [Implications of molar/molecular strategies for behavioral analysis of culture]. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, 67(3), 4–16 Retrieved from Scholar
  14. de Abreu, J. L. C. (1990). Controle dos resíduos sólidos com envolvimento de população de baixa renda [The involvement of low-income population in the control of solid waste]. Revista de Saúde Pública, 24(5), 398–406. Scholar
  15. DeLeon, I. G., & Fuqua, R. W. (1995). The effects of public commitment and group feedback on curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27(2), 233–250. Scholar
  16. Dittrich, A. (2008). Sobrevivência ou colapso? B. F. Skinner, J. M. Diamond e o destino das culturas [Survival or collapse? B. F. Skinner, J. M. Diamond and the fate of cultures]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 21(2), 252–260. Scholar
  17. Dittrich, A. (2013). B. F. Skinner sobre previsão e controle no planejamento cultural: Uma análise crítica de Oliveira, Brito, Abe, Reis e Leite (2012) [B. F. Skinner on prediction and control in cultural design: A critical analysis of Oliveira, Brito, Abe, Reis and Leite (2012)]. Estudos de Religião, 27(2), 72–93. Scholar
  18. Dorigon, L. T., & Andery, M. A. P. A. (2015). Estímulos reforçadores automáticos, naturais e arbitrários: Uma proposta de sistematização [Automatic, natural and contrived stimulus reinforcers: A proposal for systematization]. Acta Comportamentalia, 23(3), 307–321 Retrieved from Scholar
  19. Dwyer, W. O., Leeming, F. C., Cobern, M. K., Porter, B. E., & Jackson, J. M. (1993). Critical review of behavioral interventions to preserve the environment: Research since 1980. Environment and Behavior, 25(5), 485–505. Scholar
  20. Fagundes, A. J. F. M. (2015). Descrição, definição e registro de comportamento [Description, definition and record of behavior] (17th ed.). São Paulo, SP: Edicon.Google Scholar
  21. Geller, E. S., Winett, R. A., & Everett, P. B. (1982). Environmental preservation: New strategies for behavior change. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Geller, E. S., Witmer, J. F., & Orebaugh, A. L. (1976). Instructions as a determinant of paper-disposal behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 8(3), 417–438. Scholar
  23. Glenn, S. S. (1986). Metacontingencies in Walden Two. Behavior Analysis and Social Action, 5, 2–8 Retrieved from Scholar
  24. Glenn, S. S., & Malott, M. E. (2004). Complexity and selection: Implications for organizational change. Behavior and Social Issues, 13(2), 89–106. Scholar
  25. Glenn, S. S., Malott, M. E., Andery, M. A. P. A., Benvenuti, M., Houmanfar, R. A., Sandaker, I., et al. (2016). Toward consistent terminology in a behaviorist approach to cultural analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 11–27. Scholar
  26. Hayes, S. C., & Cone, J. D. (1981). Reduction of residential consumption of electricity through simple monthly feedback. Journal of Applied Analysis of Behavior, 14(1), 81–88. Scholar
  27. Hayes, S. C., Johnson, V. S., & Cone, J. D. (1975). The marked item technique: A practical procedure for litter control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8(4), 381–386. Scholar
  28. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. (2012). Diagnóstico dos resíduos sólidos urbanos: Relatório de pesquisa [Diagnosis of urban solid waste: Research report]. Brasília, Brazil: Author. Retrieved from
  29. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. (2015). Atlas da vulnerabilidade social nos municípios brasileiros [Social vulnerability atlas in Brazilian cities]. Brasília, Brazil: Author. Retrieved from
  30. Keller, J. J. (1991). The recycling solution: How I increased recycling on Dilworth Road. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(4), 617–619. Scholar
  31. Kohlenberg, R., & Phillips, T. (1973). Reinforcement and rate of litter depositing. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6(3), 391–396. Scholar
  32. Larson, M. E., Houlihan, D., & Goernert, P. N. (1995). Effects of informational feedback on aluminum can recycling. Behavioral Interventions, 10(2), 111–117. Scholar
  33. Lehman, P. K., & Geller, E. S. (2004). Behavior analysis and environmental protection: Accomplishments and potential for more. Behavior and Social Issues, 13(1), 13–32. Scholar
  34. Ludwig, T. D., Gray, T. W., & Rowell, A. (1998). Increasing recycling in academic buildings: A systematic replication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(4), 683–686. Scholar
  35. Malott, M. E., & Glenn, S. S. (2006). Targets of intervention in cultural and behavioral change. Behavior and Social Issues, 15(1), 31–56. Scholar
  36. Melo, C. M., Castro, M.S.L.B, & de Rose, J. C. C. (2015). Some relations between culture, ethics and technology in B. F. Skinner. Behavior and Social Issues, 24, 39–55.
  37. Melo, C. M., & de Rose, J. C. C. (2012). Sobrevivência das culturas em Skinner: Um diálogo com o materialismo cultural de Harris [Skinner’s survival concept of cultures: A dialogue with Harris’s cultural materialism]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 28(1), 119–128. Scholar
  38. Miller, N. D., Meindl, J. N., & Caradine, M. (2016). The effects of bin proximity and visual prompts on recycling in a university building. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 4–10. Scholar
  39. Panosso, M. G., Souza, S. R., & Haydu, V. B. (2015). Características atribuídas a jogos educativos: Uma interpretação analítico-comportamental [Characteristics attributed to educational games: A behavior analytic interpretation]. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 19(2), 233–242. Scholar
  40. Powers, R. B., Osborne, J. G., & Anderson, E. G. (1973). Positive reinforcement of litter removal in the natural environment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6(4), 579–586. Scholar
  41. Rodrigues, E. (2014). Ligados na pilha: Compostagem em escolas [Energized: Composting in schools]. Retrieved from
  42. Siero, F. W., Bakker, A. B., Dekker, G. B., & Van den Burg, M. T. C. (1996). Changing organizational energy consumption behaviour through comparative feedback. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 235–246. Scholar
  43. Skinner, B. F. (1965). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Free Press (Original work published 1953).Google Scholar
  44. Skinner, B. F. (2002). Beyond freedom and dignity. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company (Original work published 1971).Google Scholar
  45. Skinner, B. F. (2005). Walden two. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company (Original work published 1948).Google Scholar
  46. Souza, V. B., & Carrara, K. (2013). Delineamentos culturais: Transferência de controle de reforçadores arbitrários a naturais e de imediatos a atrasados [Cultural designs: Transfer of control from arbitrary to natural and from immediate to delayed reinforcers]. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 25(1), 83–98 Retrieved from Scholar
  47. Werner, C. M., Rhodes, M. U., & Partain, K. K. (1998). Designing effective instructional signs with schema theory: Case studies of polystyrene recycling. Environment and Behavior, 30(5), 709–735. Scholar
  48. Winett, R. A., Hatcher, J. W., Fort, T. R., Lecklitter, I. N., Love, S. Q., Riley, A. W., & Fishback, J. A. (1982). The effects of videotape modeling and daily feedback on residential electricity conservation, home temperature and humidity, perceived comfort, and clothing worn: Summer and winter. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15(3), 381–402. Scholar
  49. Witmer, J. F., & Geller, E. S. (1976). Facilitating paper recycling: Effects of prompts, raffles, and contests. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9(3), 315–322. Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Psicologia Geral e Análise do ComportamentoUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaLondrinaBrazil
  2. 2.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations