Dynamics of microbial contaminants is driven by selection during ethanol production
Brazil is the second largest ethanol producer in the world and largest using sugarcane feedstock. Bacteria contamination is one of the most important issues faced by ethanol producers that seek to increase production efficiency. Each step of production is a selection event due to the environmental and biological changes that occur. Therefore, we evaluated the influence of the selection arising from the ethanol production process on diversity and composition of bacteria. Our objectives were to test two hypotheses, (1) that species richness will decrease during the production process and (2) that lactic acid bacteria will become dominant with the advance of ethanol production. Bacterial community assemblage was accessed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing from 19 sequential samples. Temperature is of great importance in shaping microbial communities. Species richness increased between the decanter and must steps of the process. Low Simpson index values were recorded at the fermentation step, indicating a high dominance of Lactobacillus. Interactions between Lactobacillus and yeast may be impairing the efficiency of industrial ethanol production.
KeywordsEthanolic fermentation Sugarcane Distillery Selection Microbial ecology
We would like to thank Bruno Spacek for critical reviews of the manuscript.
This work was granted by Instituto Federal de Minas Gerais, Edital de Pesquisa Aplicada no. 156/2013.
- 12.Bonatelli ML, Quecine MC, Silva MS, Labate CA (2017) Characterization of the contaminant bacterial communities in sugarcane first-generation industrial ethanol production. FEMS Microbiol Lett 364. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnx159
- 23.Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x Google Scholar
- 24.R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.Rproject.org/
- 27.Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, et al (2019) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5–5. https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=vegan
- 33.Fusco V, Quero GM, Cho GS et al (2015) The genus Weissella: taxonomy, ecology and biotechnological potential. Front Microbiol 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00155
- 40.Rogers PL, Lee KJ, Skotnicki ML, Tribe DE (1982) Ethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis. In: Microbial Reactions. Advances in Biochemical Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 37–84Google Scholar
- 43.Basso TO, Oliveira Lino FS de (2019) Clash of Kingdoms: How Do Bacterial Contaminants Thrive in and Interact with Yeasts during Ethanol Production? In: Fuel Ethanol Production from Sugarcane. In: Basso TP, Basso LC (ed) Fuel Ethanol Production from Sugarcane. 1st edn. IntechOpen, pp 3–21. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.78413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Narendranath NV, Power R (2005) Relationship between pH and medium dissolved solids in terms of growth and metabolism of lactobacilli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae during ethanol production. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:2239–2243. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.5.2239-2243.2005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar