Advertisement

Brazilian Journal of Microbiology

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 165–173 | Cite as

Assessing the impact of Medical Microbiology classes using active strategies on short- and long-term retention on medical students: an innovative study

  • Maria-Manuel AzevedoEmail author
  • Sofia Costa-de-Oliveira
  • Rita Teixeira-Santos
  • Ana P. Silva
  • Isabel M. Miranda
  • Carmen Lisboa
  • Cidália Pina-Vaz
  • Acácio G. Rodrigues
Education in Microbiology - Research Paper
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

One of teachers’ concerns, with students in general and medical students in particular, is to ensure as much as possible that information goes from students’ short-term memories to their long-term memories. The present study focuses on knowledge retention in Medical Microbiology and assesses the effectiveness of some strategies implemented for short- and long-term retention. A pre- and post-test was used to assess student’s learning. This study involved students of Porto University (test group). Test group participants were all attending the third year of the Medicine Degree Program. The results of post-test 1 were considered very positive and support the importance of these applied active activities and/or methodologies in Medical Microbiology for short-term retention. However, the results obtained in post-test 2 showed that knowledge retention after 9 months, despite substantial, decreases.

Keywords

Teachers Medical students Microbiology 

Notes

Supplementary material

42770_2018_31_MOESM1_ESM.docx (21 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 21 kb)
42770_2018_31_MOESM2_ESM.docx (21 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 21 kb)
42770_2018_31_MOESM3_ESM.docx (14 kb)
ESM 3 (DOCX 13 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Swanson HL (1994) Short-term memory and working memory: do both contribute to our understanding of academic achievement in children and adults with learning disabilities? J Learn Disabil 27:34–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Custers E (2010) Long-term retention of basic science knowledge: a review study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 15(1):109–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Custers E, Cate OT (2011) Very long-term retention of basic science knowledge in doctors after graduation. Med Educ 45(4):422–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barrows H, Peters M (1984) How to begin reforming the medical curriculum. Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nemati A (2013) Vocabulary learning strategies: a short way to long term retention. Linguistics and Literature Studies 1(1):8–14Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tosteson DC (1990) New pathways in general medical education. N Engl J Med 322:234–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rohrer D, Pashler H (2007) Increasing retention without increasing study time. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 16(4):183–186Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pasher H (2006) How we learn. APS Obs 19:24–26Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rush BR, White BJ, Allbaugh RA, Jones ML, Klocke EE, Miesner M, Towle-Millard HA, Roush JK (2013) Investigation into the impact of audience response devices on short- and long-term content retention. J Vet Med Educ 40(2):171–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roediger HL III, Karpicke JD (2015) Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Phychol Sci 17:3Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mayer R (2004) Should there be a tree-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? Am Psychol 59(1):14–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hammett C (2010) The effects of physical movement during story time on vocabulary acquisition of primary students in grades k-1: an exploratory investigation in one school location. Diss Abstr Int Section A:70Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kvam PH (1998) The effect of active learning on student retention in engineering statistics. Techical Report, Industrial and Systems Engineering Georgia Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Azevedo MM, Pinheiro C, Miranda I, Baltazar F (2014) How to decipher a microbial puzzle on microbial control: hands on. International Educational E-Journal IV(May Special Issue):476–490Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H, Wenderoth MP (2014) Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:8410–8415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weiman CE (2014) Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Early Edition 111:8319–8320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    MacDougall CA (2017) Novel teaching tool combined with active-learning to teach antimicrobial spectrum activity. Am J Pharm Educ 81(2):25Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nelson BA, Ingard C, Nelson DB (2017) Teaching trainees how to critically evaluate the literature- a crossover study at two pediatric residency programs. Int J Med Educ 8:137–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bonney KM (2013) An argument and plan for promoting the teaching and learning of neglected tropical diseases. J Microbiol Biol Educ 14(2):183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sheakley ML, Gilbert GE, Leighton K, Hall M, Callender D, Pederson D (2016) A brief simulation intervention increasing basic science and clinical knowledge. Med Educ Online 21(1):30744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ofstad W, Brunner LJ (2013) Team-based learning in pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ 77(4):70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Franklin AS, Markowsky S, De Leo J, Sven N, Erik B (2016) Using team-based learning to teach a hybrid pharmacokinetics course online and in class. Am J Pharm Educ 80(10):171Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    The cognitive science of learning enhancement: optimizing long-term retention (2017) Available at: ctlt.ubc.ca/files/2011/02/eich-cogscience.pdf. Accessed 13.7.2017
  24. 24.
    Azevedo MM, Pinheiro C, Dias CPA, Pinto-Ribeiro F, Baltazar F (2015) Impact of an educational hands-on project on the antimicrobial, antitumor and anti-inflammatory properties of plants on Portuguese students’ awareness, knowledge, and competences. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:2437–2453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    O’Connell MB, Hewitt JM, Pastor JD 3rd, Wong MT, Bishop AL (1992) Short- and long-term retention of a nursing home education program on metered-dose inhaler technique. Ann Pharmacother 26(7–8):980–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chambers HF (2006) General principles of antimicrobial therapy. In: Brunton L, Parker K, Blumenthal D, Buxton I (eds) Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 1095–1110Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    World Health Organization (2015) Report on infectious diseases 2000. Overcoming antimicrobial resistance. Available at: http://www.who.int/infectious-disease-report/2000/index.html. Geneva: World Health Organization. Accessed 1.9.2015
  28. 28.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2017) Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/Features/GetSmart/. Accessed 10.08.2017
  29. 29.
    McNulty CAM, Boyle P, Nichols T, Clappison P, Davey J (2007) Don’t wear me out-the public’s knowledge of and attitudes to antibiotic use. J Antimicrob Chemother 59:727–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ferech M, Coenen S, Malhotra-Kumar S, Dvorakova K, Hendrickx E, Suetens C, Goossens H (2006) European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC): outpatient antibiotic use in Europe. J Antimicrob Chemother 58:401–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eurobarometer-Europeans, Science and Technology (2017) Available at: ec.europa.eu/research/ press/2001/pr0612en-report.pdf. Accessed 3.1.2017
  32. 32.
    Azevedo MM, Pinheiro C, Yaphe J, Baltazar F (2009) Portuguese students’ knowledge of antibiotics: a cross-sectional study of basic, secondary and university students in Braga. BMC Public Health 9:359.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-359 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bartolini A, Pallecchi L, Benedetti M, Fernandez C, Vallejos Y, Guzman E, Villagran AL, Mantella A, Lucchetti C, Bartalesi F et al (2005) Assessing motivation for physicians to prevent antimicrobial resistance in hospitalized children using the Health Belief Model as a framework. Am J Infect Control 33:175–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brookes-Howell L, Elwyn G, Hood K, Wood F, Cooper L, Goossens H, Ieven M, Butler CC (2012) ‘The body gets used to them’: patients’ interpretations of antibiotic resistance and the implications for containment strategies. J Gen Intern Med 27:766–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bonwell CC, Eison JA (1991) Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. George Washington, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Southwick F, Katona P, Kauffman C, Monroe S, Pirofski LA, del Rio C, Gallis H, Dismukes W (2010) Commentary: IDSA guidelines for improving the teaching of preclinical medical microbiology and infectious diseases. Acad Med 85(1):19–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Montero B, Rising B, Perez-Sabater C (2008) Research on the assessment of individual contributions to groupwork. In: Bagdonas E, Patasiene I, Rutkauskiene D (eds) Games: Virtual Words and Reality Proceedings of the 39th Conference International Simulation and Gaming Association. University of Kaunas, Lithuania, pp 20–31Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kulik JA, Kulik CLC (1979) Colleg teaching. In: Peterson PL, Walberg HJ (eds) Research on teaching: concepts, findings, and implications. McCutcheon, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Smith DG (1977) College classroom interactions and critical thinking. J Educ Psychol 69:180–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Smith KA (1998) Active learning: cooperation in the college classroom. Interaction Book Edina, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Slavin R, Sharan S, Kagan S, Lazarawit RH, Webb C, Schmuck R (1985) Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn. Plenum, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rau W, Heyl BS (1990) Humanizing the college classroom: collaborative learning and social organization among students. Teach Sociol 18:141–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Freitas CC, Freitas AG (1995) A Genética Molecular da Resistência a Drogas em Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Bras Doenças Sex Transm 7(2)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bloom BR, Murray CJL (1992) Tuberculosis commentary on reemerging killer. Science 257:1055–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Roediger HL, Karpicke JD (2006) Test-enhanced learning. Psychol Sci 17(3):249–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    de Vries TPGM, Henning RH, Hogerzeil HV, Bapna JS, Bero L, Kafle KK, Mabadeje AFB, Santoso B, Smith AJ (1995) Impact of a short course in pharmacotherapy for undergraduate medical students: an international randomized controlled study. Lancet 346:1454–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Specht LM, Sandlin PK (1991) The differential effects of experiential learning activities and traditional lecture classes in accounting. Simulation & Gaming 22(2):196–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria-Manuel Azevedo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Sofia Costa-de-Oliveira
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rita Teixeira-Santos
    • 2
  • Ana P. Silva
    • 2
    • 3
  • Isabel M. Miranda
    • 2
    • 3
  • Carmen Lisboa
    • 2
    • 3
  • Cidália Pina-Vaz
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Acácio G. Rodrigues
    • 2
    • 3
    • 5
  1. 1.School D. Maria IIVila Nova de FamalicãoPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Microbiology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  3. 3.Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  4. 4.Department of Clinical PathologyCentro Hospitalar de São JoãoPortoPortugal
  5. 5.Burn Unit, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryHospital São JoãoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations