Effects of metaperiodate and urea solutions on the serological diagnosis of human sporotrichosis using an indirect ELISA test
- 1 Downloads
Sporotrichosis is an infection of the skin caused by traumatic inoculation of the fungus Sporothrix schenckii. Definitive diagnosis relies on direct visualization of the fungus or its isolation on culture medium, although both have low sensitivity. Alternatively, the detection of the antibody response offers a more rapid alternative for diagnosis. Although the available immunoassays possess good sensitivity and specificity, cross-reactivity is still a problem. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of sodium metaperiodate and 6 M urea solutions on the serological diagnosis of sporotrichosis using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test. Ninety-six-well plates were sensitized with exoantigens from the yeast phase of S. schenckii. Sera of patients with confirmed sporotrichosis, sera of patients with paracoccidioidomycosis, and sera of individuals with a sporotrichin-negative skin test were tested. Two strategies were used; the first consisted of treating the antigen with sodium metaperiodate solution for different incubation times, and the second consisted of treating the serum with 6 M urea solution for different incubation times. ROC curve analysis revealed that the best discrimination parameters were obtained using 6 M urea solution incubated for 5 min and serum dilution at 1/600. The use of 6 M urea solution improves the performance of the ELISA test in the diagnosis of sporotrichosis.
KeywordsHuman sporotrichosis ELISA Sodium metaperiodate Urea Sporothrix schenckii
We thank Prof. Dr. Mario Leon Silva Vergara from Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM) for providing sera and information about the medical status of the patients included in this study. We also thank Dr. Rosane Orofino Costa of Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil for her clinical contribution for the sera collection supported by Faperj/PPSUS project. Also, we thank Dr. Felipe Fornias Sperandio and Dr. Anderson Messias Rodrigues for their critical review of the manuscript and Dr. Jorge Kleber Chavasco in the production of rabbit antibodies against S. schenckii antigens.
- 4.Schechtman RC (2010) Sporotrichosis: part I. Skinmed 8(4):216–220Google Scholar
- 6.Rodrigues AM, Fernandes GF, de Camargo ZP (2017) Sporotrichosis. In: Bayry J (ed) Emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases of livestock. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
- 8.Blumer SO, Kaufman L, Kaplan W, McLaughlin DW, Kraft DE (1973) Comparative evaluation of five serological methods for the diagnosis of sporotrichosis. Appl Microbiol 26(1):4–8Google Scholar
- 18.De Camargo ZP, Unterkircher C, Campoy SP, Travassos LR (1988) Production of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis exoantigens for immunodiffusion tests. J Clin Microbiol 26(10):2147–2151Google Scholar
- 23.Lappalainen M, Hedman K (2004) Serodiagnosis of toxoplasmosis. The impact of measurement of IgG avidity. Ann Ist Super Sanita 40(1):81–88Google Scholar
- 26.Conti Díaz IA (1989) Epidemiology of sporotrichosis in Latin America. Mycopathologia 108(2):113–116Google Scholar
- 31.Scott EN, Muchmore HG (1989) Immunoblot analysis of antibody responses to Sporothrix schenckii. J Clin Microbiol 27(2):300–304Google Scholar
- 34.Fernandes GF, dos Santos PO, Rodrigues AM, Sasaki AA, Burger E, de Camargo ZP (2013) Characterization of virulence profile, protein secretion and immunogenicity of different Sporothrix schenckii sensu stricto isolates compared with S. globosa and S. brasiliensis species. Virulence 4(3):241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Ishizaki H, Wheat RW, Kiel DP, Conant NF (1978) Serological cross-reactivity among Sporothrix schenckii, Ceratocystis, Europhium, and Graphium species. Infect Immun 21(2):585–593Google Scholar
- 37.Nakamura Y, Ishizaki H, Wheat RW (1977) Serological cross reactivity between group B Streptococcus and Sporothrix schenckii, Ceratocystis species, and Graphium species. Infect Immun 16(2):547–549Google Scholar
- 41.Neves AR, Mamoni RL, Rossi CL, de Camargo ZP, Blotta MH (2003) Negative immunodiffusion test results obtained with sera of paracoccidioidomycosis patients may be related to low-avidity immunoglobulin G2 antibodies directed against carbohydrate epitopes. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 10(5):802–807Google Scholar