Advertisement

Experimental and Computational Multiphase Flow

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 186–200 | Cite as

Local measurements of upward air-water two-phase flows in a vertical 6×6 rod bundle

  • Xiuzhong ShenEmail author
  • Shuichiro Miwa
  • Yigeng Xiao
  • Xu Han
  • Takashi Hibiki
Research Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

A 3 m high vertical rod bundle flow channel consisting of 6×6 rods with the rod diameter of 10 mm and the pitch of 16.7 mm and a channel box with the cross section of 100 mm × 100 mm was used to study the local two-phase flow characteristics under influences of the 36 rods and the channel box. The air and water were selected as the two-phase working fluids in the present experiments. A double-sensor probe installed at the axial position of z/DH = 149 and six evenly-installed differential pressure (DP) gauges measured the upward-moving two-phase flow in the rod bundle flow channel under the atmospheric condition. Since the local parameters of void fraction, interfacial area concentration (IAC), bubble diameter, and gas velocity are essential to know the internal structures of the two-phase flow, their data at 16 points within an octant symmetric triangular area of the flow channel cross section were collected by the double-sensor probe under various flow conditions in the experiments. The local measurements of double-sensor probe were found to agree well with the void fractions from the DP gauges and the superficial gas velocity from a gas flowmeter. Both the measured void fractions and IACs displayed a transition from radial wall-peaking profile to radial core-peaking profile in the low superficial liquid velocity flow conditions and pure radial wall-peaking profiles in the high superficial liquid velocity flow conditions. The measured Sauter mean diameters showed their radial wall-peaking profiles with the peaking degree decreasing with the increasing superficial gas velocity in both the low and high superficial liquid velocity flow conditions. The measured gas velocities in the main flow direction showed a transition from a radial nearly-flat profile or a radial mid-peaking profile to radial core-peaking profiles in the low and high superficial liquid velocity flow conditions. The area-averaged void fractions and IACs integrated from their measured local values were respectively compared with the predictions of existing drift-flux and IAC correlations. The comparison results showed that the drift-flux correlation of Ozaki et al. (2013) and the IAC correlation of Shen and Deng (2016) give the reasonable prediction and can be recommended for the predictions of the void fraction and the IAC respectively in the bubbly flows in the rod bundle flow channel.

Keywords

6×6 rod bundle flow channel gas-liquid two-phase flow void fraction interfacial area concentration double-sensor probe 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sport and Culture of Japan (Grant No. 17K07009) and Grant from Kansai Atomic Society (Kangenkon) of Japan (Grant No. Kangenkon 28-174).

References

  1. Chen, S. W., Liu, Y., Hibiki, T., Ishii, M., Yoshida, Y., Kinoshita, I., Murase, M., Mishima, K. 2012. Experimental study of air-water two-phase flow in an 8×8 rod bundle under pool condition for one-dimensional drift-flux analysis. Int J Heat Fluid Fl, 33: 168–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fu, X. Y., Ishii, M. 2003. Two-group interfacial area transport in vertical air-water flow. Nucl Eng Des, 219: 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hibiki, T., Hogsett, S., Ishii, M. 1998. Local measurement of interfacial area, interfacial velocity and liquid turbulence in two-phase flow. Nucl Eng Des, 184: 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hibiki, T., Ishii, M. 2000. Two-group interfacial area transport equations at bubbly-to-slug flow transition. Nucl Eng Des, 202: 39–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hibiki, T., Ishii, M. 2002. Interfacial area concentration of bubbly flow systems. Chem Eng Sci, 57: 3967–3977.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Hibiki, T., Lee, T. H., Lee, J. Y., Ishii, M. 2006. Interfacial area concentration in boiling bubbly flow systems. Chem Eng Sci, 61: 7979–7990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hibiki, T., Ozaki, T., Shen, X. Z., Miwa, S., Kinoshita, I., Hazuku, T., Rassame, S. 2018. Constitutive equations for vertical upward two-phase flow in rod bundle. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 127: 1252–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hosokawa, S., Hayashi, K., Tomiyama, A. 2014. Void distribution and bubble motion in bubbly flows in a 4×4 rod bundle. Part I: Experiments. J Nucl Sci Technol, 51: 220–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ishii, M. 1975. Thermo Fluid Dynamic Theory of Two Phase Flow. Eyrolles Paris, France.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Ishii, M. 1977. One-dimensional drift-flux model and constitutive equations for relative motion between phases in various two-phase flow regimes (No. ANL-77-47). Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), Argonne National Lab., Ill.(USA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ishii, M., Hibiki, T. 2010. Thermo-Fluid Dynamics of Two-Phase Flow. New York: Springer.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Kamei, A., Hosokawa, S., Tomiyama, A., Kinoshita, I., Murase, M. 2010. Void fraction in a four by four rod bundle under a stagnant condition. J Power Energy Syst, 4: 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kataoka, I., Ishii, M. 1987. Drift flux model for large diameter pipe and new correlation for pool void fraction. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 30: 1927–1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kataoka, I., Ishii, M., Serizawa, A. 1986. Local formulation and measurements of interfacial area concentration in two-phase flow. Int J Multiphase Flow, 12: 505–529.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Kondo, M., Kumamaru, H., Murata, H., Anoda, Y., Kukita, Y. 1993. Core void fraction distribution under high-temperature high-pressure boil-off conditions: Experimental study with two-phase flow test facility (TPTF). JAERI-M 93-200. Ibaraki (Japan): Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI). (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  16. Mishima, K., Ishii, M. 1984. Flow regime transition criteria for upward two-phase flow in vertical tubes. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 27: 723–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morooka, S., Ishizuka, T., Iizuka, M., Yoshimura, K. 1989. Experimental study on void fraction in a simulated BWR fuel assembly (evaluation of cross-sectional averaged void fraction). Nucl Eng Des, 114: 91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ozaki, T., Suzuki, R., Mashiko, H., Hibiki, T. 2013. Development of drift-flux model based on 8×8 BWR rod bundle geometry experiments under prototypic temperature and pressure conditions. J Nucl Sci Technol, 50: 563–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Paranjape, S. S. 2009. Two-phase flow interfacial structures in a rod-bundle geometry. Ph.D. Thesis. Purdue University.Google Scholar
  20. Rehme, K. 1973. Pressure drop correlations for fuel element spacers. Nucl Technol, 17: 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ren, Q., Pan, L., Zhou, W., Du, S., Li, Z. 2018. Phase distribution characteristics of bubbly flow in 5×5 vertical rod bundles with mixing vane spacer grids. Exp Therm Fluid Sci, 96: 451–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schlegel, J. P., Sawant, P., Paranjape, S., Ozar, B., Hibiki, T., Ishii, M. 2009. Void fraction and flow regime in adiabatic upward two-phase flow in large diameter pipes. Nucl Eng Des, 239: 2864–2874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shen, X., Deng, B. 2016. Development of interfacial area concentration correlations for small and large bubbles in gas-liquid two-phase flows. Int J Multiphase Flow, 87: 136–155.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shen, X., Deng, B. 2018. Corrigendum to “Development of interfacial area concentration correlations for small and large bubbles in gas-liquid two-phase flows” [Int. J. Multiph. Flow 87 (2016) 136–155]. Int J Multiphase Flow, 108: 93MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shen, X., Hibiki, T. 2015. Interfacial area concentration in gas-liquid bubbly to churn flow regimes in large diameter pipes. Int J Heat Fluid Fl, 54: 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shen, X., Hibiki, T., Nakamura, H. 2012. Developing structure of two-phase flow in a large diameter pipe at low liquid flow rate. Int J Heat Fluid Fl, 34: 70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shen, X., Hibiki, T., Nakamura, H. 2015. Bubbly-to-cap bubbly flow transition in a long-26m vertical large diameter pipe at low liquid flow rate. Int J Heat Fluid Fl, 52: 140–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shen, X., Matsui, R., Mishima, K., Nakamura, H. 2010a. Distribution parameter and drift velocity for two-phase flow in a large diameter pipe. Nucl Eng Des, 240: 3991–4000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shen, X., Mishima, K., Nakamura, H. 2005a. Two-phase phase distribution in a vertical large diameter pipe. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 48: 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shen, X., Mishima, K., Nakamura, H. 2008. Error reduction, evaluation and correction for the intrusive optical four-sensor probe measurement in multi-dimensional two-phase flow. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 51: 882–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shen, X., Mishima, K., Nakamura, H. 2010b. Measurement of two-phase flow in a vertical large diameter pipe using hot-film anemometer. Jpn J Multiphase Flow, 23: 605–613. (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shen, X., Nakamura, H. 2013. Local interfacial velocity measurement method using a four-sensor probe. Int J Heat Mass Transfer, 67: 843–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shen, X., Nakamura, H. 2014. Spherical-bubble-based four-sensor probe signal processing algorithm for two-phase flow measurement. Int J Multiphase Flow, 60: 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shen, X., Saito, Y., Mishima, K., Nakamura, H. 2005b. Methodological improvement of an intrusive four-sensor probe for the multi-dimensional two-phase flow measurement. Int J Multiphase Flow, 31: 593–617.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Shen, X., Saito, Y., Mishima, K., Nakamura, H. 2006. A study on the characteristics of upward air-water two-phase flow in a large pipe. Exp Therm Fluid Sci, 31: 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shen, X., Sun, H., Deng, B., Hibiki, T., Nakamura, H. 2016. Gas-liquid bubbly flow structure in a vertical large-diameter square duct. Prog Nucl Energ, 89: 140–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shen, X., Sun, H., Deng, B., Hibiki, T., Nakamura, H. 2017. Experimental study on interfacial area transport of two-phase bubbly flow in a vertical large-diameter square duct. Int J Heat Fluid Fl, 67: 168–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sun, H., Kunugi, T., Shen, X., Wu, D., Nakamura, H. 2014. Upward air-water bubbly flow characteristics in a vertical square duct. J Nucl Sci Technol, 51: 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tamai, H., Kureta, M., Ohnuki, A., Sato, T., Akimoto, H. 2006. Pressure drop experiments using tight-lattice 37-rod bundles. J Nucl Sci Technol, 43: 699–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang, X., Schlegel, J. P., Liu, Y., Paranjape, S., Hibiki, T., Ishii, M. 2012. Measurement and modeling of two-phase flow parameters in scaled 8×8 BWR rod bundle. Int J Heat Fluid Fl, 34: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang, X., Schlegel, J. P., Liu, Y., Paranjape, S., Hibiki, T., Ishii, M. 2013. Experimental study of interfacial area transport in air-water two phase flow in a scaled 8×8 BWR rod bundle. Int J Multiphase Flow, 50: 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yun, B. J. 1996. Measurement of two-phase flow parameters in the subcooled boiling. Ph.D. Thesis. Seoul National University.Google Scholar
  43. Yun, B. J., Park, G. C., Julia, J. E., Hibiki, T. 2008. Flow structure of subcooled boiling water flow in a subchannel of 3×3 rod bundles. J Nucl Sci Technol, 45: 402–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang, K., Fan, Y., Tian, W., Guo, K., Qiu, S., Su, G. 2016. Pressure drop characteristics of two-phase flow in a vertical rod bundle with support plates. Nucl Eng Des, 300: 322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zuber, N., Findlay, J. A., 1965. Average volumetric concentration in two-phase flow systems. J Heat Transfer, 87: 453–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiuzhong Shen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shuichiro Miwa
    • 2
  • Yigeng Xiao
    • 2
  • Xu Han
    • 3
  • Takashi Hibiki
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute for Integrated Radiation and Nuclear ScienceKyoto UniversityOsakaJapan
  2. 2.Division of Energy and Environmental Systems, Graduate School of EngineeringHokkaido UniversitySapporo, HokkaidoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Nuclear EngineeringKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  4. 4.School of Nuclear EngineeringPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations