Advertisement

Effect of Dried Pig Manure Fertilization on Barley Macronutrients and Sodium in a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone

  • Juan M. Antolín-Rodríguez
  • Mercedes Sánchez-Báscones
  • Jesús Martín-Gil
  • Pablo Martín-RamosEmail author
Original Paper
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Dried pig manure (DPM) may be valorized as a fertilizer suitable for barley crop in nitrate vulnerable zones (NVZs). The aim of this study was determine the macronutrients and sodium contents in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) resulting from its application in a NVZ in Fompedraza (Valladolid, Spain). DPM was applied at three rates (85, 133, and 170 kg N ha−1 year−1); the mineral fertilizer with a nitrification inhibitor was applied at two rates (90 and 108 kg N ha−1 year−1), and these were compared with the control treatment (without fertilization) in a randomized complete block design. Nutrients were monitored in four different plant growth stages and in grain over a 3-year period. DMP-based fertilization increased P and Na contents in plant and decreased those of Ca and Mg. These changes were only translated into a P increase in grain. The Na content in plant should not affect the final crop yield, making this waste management strategy viable even in NVZs. However, N content in plant in tillering and stem elongation stages was lower for DPM-based fertilization than for mineral fertilization, and so was the C content, both in plant and in grain. Since N content is a limiting factor for crop development, supplementary mineral fertilization would be advised to compensate for N immobilization if this organic waste material is to be valorized as a fertilizer.

Keywords

Cogeneration plant DPM ENTEC NVZ Sodium Waste valorization 

Abbreviations

DMPP

3,4-dimethylpyrazol phosphate

DPM

Dried pig manure

NVZ

Nitrate vulnerable zone

Notes

Funding Information

This work was supported by Castilla-y-León Regional Government (Regional Ministry of Environment).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

42729_2019_123_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. Agegnehu G, Nelson PN, Bird MI (2016) The effects of biochar, compost and their mixture and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and nitrogen use efficiency of barley grown on a nitisol in the highlands of Ethiopia. Sci Total Environ 569-570:869–879.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alessi J, Power J (1969) Phosphorus on barley: relation of placement on growth and nutrition. N. D. Farm Res 26:17–19Google Scholar
  3. Anwar Z, Ping A, Haroon B, Irshad M, Owens G (2018) Nutrients losses via runoff from soils amended with cow manure composted with leaf litter. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 18:851–864.  https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-95162018005002501
  4. Baker JM, Tucker BB (2008) Critical N, P and K levels in winter wheat. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 4:347–358.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627309366457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergmann W (1992) Nutritional disorders of plants: development, visual and analytical diagnosis. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, JenaGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop LR (1930) The nitrogen content and “quality” of barley. J Inst Brew 36:352–369.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2050-0416.1930.tb05271.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bollons HM, Barraclough PB (1999) Assessing the phosphorus status of winter wheat crops: inorganic orthophosphate in whole shoots. J Agric Sci 133:285–295.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859699007066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brod E, Øgaard AF, Krogstad T, Haraldsen TK, Frossard E, Oberson A (2016) Drivers of Phosphorus Uptake by Barley Following Secondary Resource Application. Front Nutr.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2016.00012
  9. Cieślik E, Pisulewska E, Witkowicz R, Cieślik E, Kidacka A (2017) Assessment of the impact of various agricultural technology levels on the content of ash and minerals in grain of selected spring barley cultivars. J Elem 22:195–207.  https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2016.21.2.946
  10. Ciołek A, Makarska E, Wesołowski M (2012) Content of selected nutrients in wheat, barley and oat grain from organic and conventional farming. J Elem 17:181–189.  https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2012.17.2.02
  11. Cossani CM, Slafer GA, Savin R (2011) Do barley and wheat (bread and durum) differ in grain weight stability through seasons and water–nitrogen treatments in a Mediterranean location? Field Crop Res 121:240–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.12.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cruz-Paredes C, López-García Á, Rubæk GH, Hovmand MF, Sørensen P, Kjøller R (2017) Risk assessment of replacing conventional P fertilizers with biomass ash: residual effects on plant yield, nutrition, cadmium accumulation and mycorrhizal status. Sci Total Environ 575:1168–1176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.194 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dang Y, Christopher J, Dalal R (2016) Genetic diversity in barley and wheat for tolerance to soil constraints. Agronomy:6.  https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy6040055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dick A, Malhi S, O’Sullivan P, Walker D (1985) Chemical composition of whole plant and grain and yield of nutrients in grain of five barley cultivars. Plant Soil 86:257–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ding X, Yuan Y, Liang Y, Li L, Han X (2014) Impact of long-term application of manure, crop residue, and mineral fertilizer on organic carbon pools and crop yields in a mollisol. J Soils Sediments 14:854–859.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0840-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gonzalez JL, Benitez IC, Perez MI, Medina M (1992) Pig-slurry composts as wheat fertilizers. Bioresour Technol 40:125–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(92)90197-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenwood DJ, Neeteson JJ, Draycott A (1986) Quantitative relationships for the dependence of growth rate of arable crops on their nitrogen content, dry weight and aerial environment. Plant Soil 91:281–301.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02198111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greenwood DJ, Karpinets TV, Zhang K, Bosh-Serra A, Boldrini A, Karawulova L (2008) A unifying concept for the dependence of whole-crop N:P ratio on biomass: theory and experiment. Ann Bot 102:967–977.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hejcman M, Berková M, Kunzová E (2013) Effect of long-term fertilizer application on yield and concentrations of elements (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, As, Cd, Cu, Cr, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, Zn) in grain of spring barley. Plant Soil Environ 59:329–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoppo SD, Elliott DE, Reuter DJ (1999) Plant tests for diagnosing phosphorus deficiency in barley (Hordeum vulgare L). Aust J Exp Agric 39:857–872.  https://doi.org/10.1071/ea99029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jahan M, Amiri MB (2018) Optimizing application rate of nitrogen, phosphorus and cattle manure in wheat production: an approach to determine optimum scenario using response-surface methodology. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 18:13–26.  https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-95162018005000102
  22. Jākobsone I, Kantāne I, Zute S, Jansone I, Bartkevičs V (2015) Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences. Proc. Latv. Acad. Sci., B Nat. exact appl. sci. https://portal.issn.org/resource/issn/2199-5966
  23. Kováčik J, Štěrbová D, Babula P, Švec P, Hedbavny J (2014) Toxicity of naturally-contaminated manganese soil to selected crops. J Agric Food Chem 62:7287–7296.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf5010176 https://cassi.cas.org/publication.jsp?P=eCQtRPJo9AQyz133K_ll3zLPXfcr-WXf4FOUoPflIN9Q4Uuf3YSHFCzUBG5hPgl0Ms9d9yv5Zd_EQxVEcOT7t9T2F4sGrwmHMs9d9yv5Zd9sBoPlsS_fbjFSU7MkK1Vq) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuzyakov Y, Domanski G (2000) Carbon input by plants into the soil. Review J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 163:421–431.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2624(200008)163:4<421::aid-jpln421>3.0.co;2-r
  25. Lambers H, Simpson RJ, Beilharz VC, Dalling MJ (1982) Growth and translocation of C and N in wheat (Triticum aestivum) grown with a split root system. Physiol Plant 56:421–429.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1982.tb04535.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li-Xian Y, Guo-Liang L, Shi-Hua T, Gavin S, Zhao-Huan H (2007) Salinity of animal manure and potential risk of secondary soil salinization through successive manure application. Sci Total Environ 383:106–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.05.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maillard A et al (2015) Leaf mineral nutrient remobilization during leaf senescence and modulation by nutrient deficiency. Front Plant Sci:6.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00317
  28. Makara A, Kowalski Z (2018) Selection of pig manure management strategies: case study of Polish farms. J Clean Prod 172:187–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maleki-Farahani S, Chaichi M, Mazaheri D, Tavakkol Afshari R, Savaghebi G (2011) Barley grain mineral analysis as affected by different fertilizing systems and by drought stress. J Agric Sci Technol 13:315–326Google Scholar
  30. MAPAMA (2017) Sistema de Información Agroclimática para el Regadío (SiAR). Spanish Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Food and Environment http://eportal.mapama.gob.es/websiar/Inicio.aspx. Accessed September 24 2017
  31. Moreno JL, García C, Hernández T, Pascual JA (1996) Transference of heavy metals from a calcareous soil amended with sewage-sludge compost to barley plants. Bioresour Technol 55:251–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(96)00009-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ostrowska A, Porębska G (2017) The content of calcium and magnesium and the Ca:Mg ratio in cultivated plants in the context of human and animal demand for nutrients. J Elem 22:995–1004.  https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2016.21.4.1246
  33. Przulj N, Momcilovic V (2003) Dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and use in spring barley. Plant Soil Environ 49:36–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rutkowska A (2013) Sensitivity of plant and soil indices in evaluating the long-term consequences of soil mining from reserves of phosphorus, potassium, and magnesium. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 44:377–389.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2013.742310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sánchez-Báscones M, Antolín-Rodríguez J, Bravo-Sánchez C, Martín-Gil J, Martín-Ramos P (2019) Dried pig manure from a cogeneration plant as a fertilizer for nitrate vulnerable zones. Agronomy:9.  https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9020046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Savin R, Prystupa P, Araus JL (2006) Hordein composition as affected by post-anthesis source–sink ratio under different nitrogen availabilities. J Cereal Sci 44:113–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2006.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shah JM, Bukhari SAH, J-b Z, X-y QA, Ali E, Muhammad N, G-p Z (2017) Nitrogen (N) metabolism related enzyme activities, cell ultrastructure and nutrient contents as affected by N level and barley genotype. J Integr Agric 16:190–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s2095-3119(15)61308-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shepherd JG, Buss W, Sohi SP, Heal KV (2017) Bioavailability of phosphorus, other nutrients and potentially toxic elements from marginal biomass-derived biochar assessed in barley ( Hordeum vulgare ) growth experiments. Sci Total Environ 584-585:448–457.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simpson RJ, Lambers H, Dalling MJ (1983) Nitrogen redistribution during grain growth in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) : IV. Development of a quantitative model of the translocation of nitrogen to the grain. Plant Physiol 71:7–14.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.71.1.7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Slamka P, Krcek M, Golisova A (2011) Concentration of magnesium and its uptake by aboveground phytomass of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) grown under drought stress condition. Res J Agric Sci 43:198–20Google Scholar
  41. Sørensen P, Jensen ES, Nielsen NE (1994) The fate of 15N-labelled organic nitrogen in sheep manure applied to soils of different texture under field conditions. Plant Soil 162:39–47.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01416088
  42. Souto AGL, Cavalcante LF, MRMd S, RMF F, AJd LN, BLMT D (2018) Nutritional status and production of noni plants fertilized with manure and potassium. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 18:403–417.  https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-95162018005001301
  43. Spanish Ministry of the Presidency (1996) Real Decreto 261/1996, de 16 febrero, sobre protección de las aguas contra la contaminación producida por los nitratos procedentes de fuentes agrarias. MadridGoogle Scholar
  44. Ullrich SE (2011) Barley, production, improvement, and uses. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex, UK; Ames, IowaGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilczewski E (2014) Content of macroelements and crude fibre in grain of spring barley cultivated in different agronomic conditions. Acta Sci Pol Agricultura 13(1):73–83. http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.agro-27ba18d7-1a50-414eba47-be40d08a80a8/c/1.pdf
  46. Ylivainio K, Peltovuori T (2012) Phosphorus acquisition by barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) at suboptimal soil temperature. Agric Food Sci 21:453–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zornoza R, Mataix-Solera J, Guerrero C, Arcenegui V, Mataix-Beneyto J, Gómez I (2008) Validating the effectiveness and sensitivity of two soil quality indices based on natural forest soils under Mediterranean conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2079–2087.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedad Chilena de la Ciencia del Suelo 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agroforestry Sciences, ETSIIAAUniversity of ValladolidPalenciaSpain
  2. 2.Agriculture and Forestry Engineering Department, ETSIIAAUniversidad de ValladolidPalenciaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Ambientales de Aragón (IUCA), EPSUniversidad de ZaragozaHuescaSpain

Personalised recommendations