Advertisement

Biochemical and Physiological Responses of Three Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cultivars Grown Under Cr6+ Stress

  • O. DichalaEmail author
  • I. Therios
  • M. Koukourikou-Petridou
  • A. Papadopoulos
  • T. Sotiropoulos
Original Paper
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

The present investigation assesses the physiological and biochemical responses of pomegranate plants (Punica granatum L.) to increased concentrations of hexavalent chromium (Cr6+) after 150 days of growth under in vivo conditions. The tested cultivars (cvs) were ‘Wonderful’, ‘Acco’, and ‘Ermioni’. The aim of this research was to study accumulation of total Cr and its distribution in leaves and roots, as well as its effects on growth, total chlorophyll (a + b), carotenoids, porphyrins, phenols, flavonoids, and antioxidant capacity (FRAP assay) of leaves. The measured parameters where the total fresh weight of leaves and roots; the total Cr concentration of leaves and roots; and the chlorophyll, carotenoids, porphyrins, and carbohydrate concentration. Furthermore, total phenols, flavonoids, and FRAP were measured. The results indicated that addition of Cr6+ in the nutrient solution caused augmentation of chromium concentration in roots and leaves of pomegranate plants. Total Cr in roots was 11–16 times greater than in leaves. Concerning porphyrin concentration, ‘Wonderful’ was the most negatively affected cultivar. Total phenols, flavonoids, and FRAP values increased due to Cr6+ treatment. Chromium concentration of 20 and 40 mg L−1 increased significantly chromium level of leaves and roots in pomegranate plants. ‘Ermioni’ accumulates less Cr in leaves, in comparison with the other cvs, and has greater chlorophyll, phenol, and flavonoid concentration and FRAP value. ‘Ermioni’ could be considered a more tolerant cv to Cr6+ toxicity compared with ‘Wonderful’ and ‘Acco’.

Keywords

Biochemical parameters Chromium Cultivar effect Heavy metal Pomegranate 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to G. Kostelenos nurseries, for kindly providing the pomegranate plants. Also, our sincere thanks to the laboratory staff of Institute of Soil and Water Resources, for their technical assistance in the inorganic analyses.

Funding Information

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki and of the Institute of Soil and Water Resources, Hellenic Agricultural Organization Demeter.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Afshan S, Ali S, Bharwana SA, Rizwan M, Farid M, Abbas F, Ibrahim M, Mehmood MA, Abbasi GH (2015) Citric acid enhances the phytoextraction of chromium, plant growth, and photosynthesis by alleviating the oxidative damages in Brassica napus L. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22:11679–11689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed F, Hossain MS, Mohammad Abdullah AT, Akbor MA, Ahsan A, Md. (2016) Public health risk assessment of chromium intake from vegetables grown in the wastewater irrigated site in Bangladesh. Pollution 2:425–432Google Scholar
  3. Alsayed ME, Elqusy ON (2018) Heavy metals uptake and translocation by lettuce and spinach grown on a metal-contaminated soil. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 18:1097–1107Google Scholar
  4. Bah AM, Dai H, Zhao J, Sun H, Cao F, Zhang G, Wu F (2011) Effects of cadmium, chromium and lead on growth, metal uptake and antioxidative capacity in Typha angustifolia. Biol Trace Elem Res 142:77–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barcelo J, Poschenrieder C (1997) Chromium in plants. In: Angeli-Canali S, Canali F, Tittarelli F, Sequi S (eds) Chromium environmental issues, Milan, pp 101–130Google Scholar
  6. Bashri G, Parihar P, Singh R, Singh S, Singh VP, Prasad MS (2016) Physiological and biochemical characterization of two Amaranthus species under Cr(VI) stress differing in Cr(VI) tolerance. Plant Physiol Biochem 108:12–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benzie IF, Strain JJ (1996) The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem 239:70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bingham FT (1982) Boron. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of soil analysis, part 2: Chemical and mineralogical properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 431–448Google Scholar
  9. Cervantes C, Campos-García J, Devars S, Gutiérrez-Corona F, Loza-Tavera H, Torres-Guzmán JC, Moreno-Sánchez R (2001) Interactions of chromium with microorganisms and plants. FEMS Microbiol Rev 25:335–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Das BC, Panda A, Sahoo PK, Jena S, Padhi P (2014) Effect of chromium (VI) on wheat seedlings and the role of chelating agents. Curr Sci Int 106:1387–1395Google Scholar
  11. Daud MK, Mei L, Variath MT, Ali S, Li C, Rafiq MT, Zhu SJ (2014) Chromium (VI) uptake and tolerance potential in cotton cultivars: effect on their root physiology, ultramorphology and oxidative metabolism. Biomed Res Int 12 pagesGoogle Scholar
  12. Elhassan H, Wahab A, Abdalla H, Busra E, Shiekh E, Nur E (2014) Effect of chromium on antioxidant enzyme activity in some sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) genotypes. Int J Sci Technol Res 3:19–27Google Scholar
  13. Fales WF (1951) The assimilation and degradation of carbohydrates by yeast cells. J Biol Chem 193:113–124Google Scholar
  14. Ganesh KS, Baskaran L, Rajasekaran S, Sumathi K, Chidambaram AL, Sundaramoorthy P (2008) Chromium stress induced alterations in biochemical and enzyme metabolism in aquatic and terrestrial plants. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 63:159–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gangwar S, Singh VP (2011) Indole acetic acid differently changes growth and nitrogen metabolism in Pisum sativum L. seedlings under chromium (VI) phytotoxicity: implications of oxidative stress. Sci Hortic 129:321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Circ Calif Agric Exp Stn 347:1–32Google Scholar
  17. Jabeen N, Abbas Z, Iqbal M, Riswan M, Jabbar A, Farid M, Ali S, Ibrahim M, Abbas F (2016) Glycinebetaine mediates chromium tolerance in mung bean through lowering of Cr uptake and improved antioxidant system. Arch Agron Soil Sci 62:648–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kanto U, Jutamanee K, Osotsapar Y, Chai-Arree W, Jattupornpong S (2015) Promotive effect of priming with 5-aminolevulinic acid on seed germination capacity, seedling growth and antioxidant enzyme activity in rice subjected to accelerated ageing treatment. Plant Prod Sci 18:443–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kjeldahl JA (1883) Neue Methode zur Bestimmung des Stickstoffs in Organischen Körpern. Fresenius Z Anal Chem 22:366–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kulbat K (2016) The role of phenolic compounds in plant resistance. Biotechnol Food Sci 80:97–108Google Scholar
  21. Liu D, Jiang W, Li M (1992) Effects of trivalent and hexavalent chromium on root growth and cell division of Allium cepa. Hereditas 117:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mallick S, Sinam G, Mishra RK, Sinha S (2010) Interactive effects of Cr and Fe treatments on plants growth, nutrition and oxidative status in Zea mays L. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 73:987–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mangabeira PA, Ferreira AS, De Almeida AA, Fernandes VF, Lucena E, Souza VL, Dos Santos Júnior AJ, Oliveira AH, Grenier-Loustalot MF, Barbier F, Silva DC (2011) Compartmentalization and ultrastuctural alterations induced by chromium in aquatic macrophytes. Biometals 24:1017–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mastrogiannidou E, Chatzissavvides C, Antonopoulou C, Tsabardoukas V, Giannakoula A, Therios I (2016) Response of pomegranate cv. Wonderful plants to salinity. J Soil Sci Plant Nut 16:621–636Google Scholar
  25. Miguel MG, Neves MA, Antunes MD (2010) Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.): a medicinal plant with myriad biological properties - a short review. J Med Plant Res 4:2836–2847Google Scholar
  26. Mohanty M, Patra KH (2016) Tolerance potential and physiological responses of Helianthus annuus L. exposed to varying doses of hexavalent chromium. J Mater Environ Sci 7:2221–2228Google Scholar
  27. Nagajyoti PC, Lee KD, Sreekanth TVM (2010) Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: a review. Environ Chem Lett 8:199–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Namieśnik J, Rabajczyk A (2012) Speciation analysis of chromium in environmental samples. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 42:327–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Panda SK, Choudhur S (2005) Chromium stress in plants. Braz J Plant Physiol 17:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pandley N, Sharma CP (2003) Chromium interference in iron nutrition and water relations of cabbage. Environ Exp Bot 49:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parvizi H, Sepaskhah AR, Ahmadi SH (2014) Effect of drip irrigation and fertilizer regimes on fruit yields and water productivity of a pomegranate (Punica granatum (L.) cv. Rabab) orchard. Agric Water Manag 146:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Plummer DT (1987) An introduction to practical biochemistry. McGraw-Hill, London, 332 pGoogle Scholar
  33. Prasad KN, Divakar S, Shivamurthy GR, Aradhya SM (2005) Isolation of a free radical scavenging antioxidant from water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica Forsk). J Sci Food Agric 85:1461–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Redondo-Gómez S, Mateos E, Vecino I, Feldman SR (2011) Accumulation and tolerance characteristics of chromium in a cordgrass Cr-hyperaccumulator, Spartina argentinensis. J Hazard Mater 185:862–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rehbi AEM, Lounici H, Lahrech MB, Morel JL (2019) Response of Artemisia herba alba to hexavalent chromium pollution under arid and semi-arid conditions. Int J Phytoremediation 21:224–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Riswan M, Ali S, Rizvi H, Rinklebe J, Tsang CWD, Meers E, Ok SY, Ishaque W (2016) Phytomanagement of heavy metals in contaminated soils using sunflower: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 46:1498–1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rodriguez E, Santos C, Azevedo R, Moutinho-Pereira J, Correia C, Dias MC (2012) Chromium (VI) induces toxicity at different photosynthetic levels in pea. Plant Physiol Biochem 53:94–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Samantaray S, Das S, Mohanty RC, Mohanty M, Pradhan C (2015) Altered germination index and chlorophyll biosynthesis in seedlings of wild rice cultivars in response to hexavalent chromium stress. Discovery 27:27–35Google Scholar
  39. Scalbert A, Monties B, Janin G (1989) Tannins in wood: comparison of different estimation methods. J Agric Food Chem 37:1324–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shadreck M, Mugadza T (2013) Chromium, an essential nutrient and pollutant: a review. Afr J Pure Appl Chem 7:310–317Google Scholar
  41. Shanker KA, Cervantes C, Loza-Tavera H, Avudainayagam S (2005) Chromium toxicity in plants. Environ Int 31:739–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Singh HP, Mahajan P, Kaur S, Batish DR, Kohli RK (2013) Chromium toxicity and tolerance in plants. Environ Chem Lett 11:229–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stambulska YU, Bayliak MM, Lushchak IV (2018, 2018) Chromium (VI) toxicity in legume plants: modulation effects of rhizobial symbiosis. Biomed Res Int 13 pagesGoogle Scholar
  44. Sundaramoorthy P, Chidambaram A, Ganesh KS, Unnikannan P, Baskaran L (2010) Chromium stress in paddy: (i) nutrient status of paddy under chromium stress (ii) phytoremediation of chromium by aquatic and terrestrial weeds. C R Biol 333:597–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Suseela MR, Sinha S, Singh S, Saxena R (2002) Accumulation of chromium and scanning electron microscopic studies in Scirpus lacustris L. treated with metal and tannery effluent. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 68:540–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vajpayee P, Tripathi RD, Rai UN, Ali MB, Singh SN (2000) Chromium (VI) accumulation reduces chlorophyll biosynthesis, nitrate reductase activity and protein content in Nymphaea alba L. Chemosphere 41:1075–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vidayanti V, Choesin DN, Iriawati I (2017) Phytoremediation of chromium: distribution and speciation of chromium in Typha angustifolia. Int J Plant Biol 8:14–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wintermans JEG, De Mots A (1965) Spectrophotometric characteristics of chlorophyll a and b and their phaeophytins in ethanol. Biochim Biophys Acta 109:448–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wyszkowski M, Radziemska M (2013) Assessment of Tri- and Hexavalent chromium phytotoxicity on oats (Avena sativa L.) biomass and content of nitrogen compounds. Water Air Soil Pollut 224:1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zayed A, Lytle C, Qian JH, Terry N (1998) Chromium accumulation, translocation and chemical speciation in vegetable crops. Planta 206:293–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang D, Jiang L, Shao Y, Chai B, Li C (2009) Variations in germination and endogenous hormone contents of wheat cultivars under Cr stress. Chin J Appl Environ Biol 15:602–605Google Scholar
  52. Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W (1999) The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem 64:555–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedad Chilena de la Ciencia del Suelo 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Biology of Horticultural CropsAristotle UniversityThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Hellenic Agricultural Organization – DemeterInstitute of Soil and Water ResourcesThermiGreece
  3. 3.Laboratory of Pomology, School of AgricultureAristotle UniversityThessalonikiGreece
  4. 4.Institute of Soil and Water ResourcesHellenic Agricultural Organization DemeterThermiGreece
  5. 5.Department of Deciduous Fruit Growing in NaoussaInstitute of Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources, Hellenic Agricultural OrganizationNaoussaGreece

Personalised recommendations