Advertisement

Establishing a Suitable Soil Quality Index for Semi-arid Rangeland Ecosystems in Northwest of Iran

  • Esmaeil Sheidai KarkajEmail author
  • Adel Sepehry
  • Hossein Barani
  • Javad Motamedi
  • Farzin Shahbazi
Original Paper
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

Establishing soil quality index (SQI) is a common procedure in assessing soil capacity function. Various SQIs can be designed and used in soil evaluations upon the aspects including data set, efficiency, and sensitivity. This study was conducted to distinguish a representative soil minimum dataset (MDS) among 16 total dataset (TDS) properties in semi-arid rangeland ecosystems of northwest Iran. Appropriate SQIs were calculated applying the models of integrated quality index (IQI) and Nemoro quality index (NQI). IQI by simple additive and weighted additive approaches and also NQI were calculated for both MDS and TDS based on linear transformation of soil parameters. Totally, different SQIs including simple additive IQI, weighted additive IQI, and NQI were separately established to TDS and MDS. Sensitivity index (SI) and efficiency ratio (ER) of each SQI were then calculated for prioritizing and selecting suitable index. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that seven indicators are appropriate MDS for accounting 70.27% of data variations. Maximum and minimum SI belonged to MDS-NQI and TDS-weighted additive IQI, with values of 2.597 and 2.056, respectively. MDS-NQI has the highest value of ER (85.71), while TDS (both weighted and simple additive)-IQI has received the lowest value of ER (71.43). Final prioritizing according to ranks of SI and ER showed that MDS-NQI is the most suitable approach in soil quality assessment of semi-arid rangelands. Therefore, it could reduce cost due to measuring fewer indicators in the laboratory on contrary premise to have more dense soil samples in the field.

Keywords

Soil quality index Soil indicators Minimum dataset Principal components analysis Rangelands 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adetunji AT, Francis B, Lewu FB, Mulidzi R, Bongani Ncube B (2017) The biological activities of β-glucosidase, phosphatase and urease as soil quality indicators: a review. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 17(3):794–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews SS, Karlen DL, Mitchell JP (2002b) A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California. Agric Ecosyst Environ 90(1):25–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews SS, Mitchell JP, Mancinelli R, Karlen DL, Hartz TK, Horwath WR, Pettygrove GS, Scow KM, Munk DS (2002a) On-farm assessment of soil quality in California’s Central Valley. Agron J 94:12–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Askari MS, Holden NM (2015) Quantitative soil quality indexing of temperate arable management systems. Soil Tillage Res 150:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldock JA, Nelson PN (2000) Handbook of soil science. CRC press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp B25–B84Google Scholar
  6. Bo Y, Zhu Q, Bao Y, Zhao W, Zhao Y, Zhang H (2014) A comparative study on three methods of soil quality evaluation of microtopography in the semi-arid Loess Plateau. China J Environ Biol 36:325–330Google Scholar
  7. Bünemanna EK, Bongiornoa G, Bai Z, Creamer RE, De Deynb G, de Goedeb R, Fleskens L, Geissend V, Kuyper TW, Mäder P, Pullemanb M, Sukkel W, van Groenigen JW, Brussaard L (2018) Soil quality – a critical review. Soil Biol Biochem 120:105–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carter MR, Gregorich EG. 2008. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Canadian Society of Soil Science. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group Boca Raton FLGoogle Scholar
  9. de Melo Filho JF, Vasconcelos Souza AL, da Silva Souza L (2007) Determination of the subsurface quality index in a cohesive argisolic yellow latosol under natural forest in coastal plains. Braz J Soil Sci 31:1599–1608Google Scholar
  10. Doran J W, Parkin T B. 1994. Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Doran JW, Coleman DC, Bezdicek DF, Stewart BA, (Eds.). Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., SSSA Spec. Publ. 35. ASA, USA Madison, WI, pp. 3–21Google Scholar
  11. Ellert DH, Bettany JR (1995) Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes. J Soil Sci 5:150–162Google Scholar
  12. Flury B, Riedwyl H (1988) Multivariate statistics: a practical approach. Chapman & Hall, Ltd, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gee GW, Or D (2002) Particle-size analysis. In: Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis, part 4: Physical methods. pub: agronomy monograph, vol 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 255–293 866Google Scholar
  14. Ghaemi M, Astaraei AR, Emami H, Nassiri Mahalati M, Sanaeinejad SH (2014) Determining soil indicators for soil sustainability assessment using principal component analysis of Astan Quds- east of Mashhad- Iran. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 14(4):987–1004Google Scholar
  15. Guo LL, Sun ZG, Ouyang Z, Han DR, Li FD (2017) A comparison of soil quality evaluation methods for fluvisol along the lower Yellow River. Catena 152:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huntington TG (2000) The potential for calcium depletion in forest ecosystems of southeastern United States: review and analysis. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 14:623–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iranian Organization of Forests, Rangelands and Watershed Management, 2004. Report of producing vegetation map of Iran 130 (In Persian)Google Scholar
  18. Johnson RA, Wichern DW (1992) Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  19. Li P, Zhang TL, Wang XX, Yu DS (2013) Development of biological soil quality indicator system for subtropical China. Soil Tillage Res 126:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liebig MA, Varvel G, Doran JW (2001) A simple performance based index for assessing multiple agroecosystem functions. Agron J 93:313–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lima ACR, Brussaard L, Totola MR, Hoogmoed WB, de Goede RGM (2013) A functional evaluation of three indicator sets for assessing soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol 64:194–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marín C, Godoy R, Valenzuela E, Schloter M, Wubet T, Boy J, Gschwendtner S (2017) Functional land-use change effects on soil fungal communities in Chilean temperate rainforests. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 17(4):985–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martínez MM, Ortega R, Janssens M, Fincheira P (2018) Use of organic amendments in table grape: effect on plant root system and soil quality indicators. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 18(1):100–112Google Scholar
  24. Marzaioli R, D’Ascoli R, De Pascale RA, Rutigliano FA (2010) Soil quality in a Mediterranean area of southern Italy as related to different land use type. Appl Soil Ecol 44:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mofidi M, Jafari J, Tavili A, Rashtbari M, Alijanpour A (2013) Grazing exclusion effect on soil and vegetation properties in Imam Kandi rangelands, Iran. Arid Land Res Manag 27(1):32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nakajima T, La R, Jiang S (2015) Soil quality index of a Crosby silt loam in Central Ohio. Soil Tillage Res 146:323–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ndakidemi PA, Semoka JMR (2006) Soil fertility survey in Western Usambara Northern Tanzania. Pedosphere 16(2):237–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nosrati K (2012) Assessing soil quality indicator under different land use and soil erosion using multivariate statistical techniques. Environ Monit Assess 185(4):2895–2907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Qi Y, Darilek JL, Huang B, Zhao Y, Sun W, Gu Z (2009) Evaluating soil quality indices in an agricultural region of Jiangsu Province, China. Geoderma 149:325–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rahmanipoura F, Marzaioli R, Bahrami HA, Fereidouni Z, Rahimi Bandarabadi S (2014) Assessment of soil quality indices in agricultural lands of Qazvin Province, Iran. Ecol Indic 40:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raiesi F (2017) A minimum data set and soil quality index to quantify the effect of land use conversion on soil quality and degradation in native rangelands of upland arid and semiarid regions. Ecol Indic 75:307–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rezaei S, Gilkes R, Andrews S (2006) A minimum data set for assessing soil quality in rangelands. Geoderma 136:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. In: Richards LA (ed) Handbook of U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook, 60th edn. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, p 160Google Scholar
  34. Soil Survey Division Staff (1993) Soil survey manual. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, p 437 (United States Department of Agriculture Handbook No. 18)Google Scholar
  35. Stark S, Mannisto MK, Ganzert L, Tiirola M, Haggblom MM (2015) Grazing intensity in subarctic tundra affects the temperature adaptation of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 84:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tesfahunegn GB (2014) Soil quality assessment strategies for evaluating soil degradation in Northern Ethiopia. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2014(646502):1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/646502 Google Scholar
  37. Zhang Y, Xu X, Li Z, Liu M, Xu C, Zhang R, Luo W (2019) Effects of vegetation restoration on soil quality in degraded karst landscapes of Southwest China. Sci Total Environ 650:2657–2665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zornoza R, Mataix-Solera J, Guerrero C, Arcenegui V, Garcia-Orenes F, Mataix-Beneyto J, Morugan A (2007) Evaluation of soil quality using multiple lineal regressions based on physical, chemical and biochemical properties. Sci Total Environ 378:233–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedad Chilena de la Ciencia del Suelo 2019
corrected publication 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural ResourcesUrmia UniversityUrmiaIran
  2. 2.Department of Rangeland Management, Faculty of Rangeland and Watershed ManagementGorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural ResourcesGorganIran
  3. 3.Rangeland Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and RangelandsAgricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO)TehranIran
  4. 4.Department of Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran

Personalised recommendations