Species composition of parasitoids and predators in two rice agro-farming systems—effect of ecological intensification

  • Sudhendu SharmaEmail author
  • Parminder S. Shera
  • Kamaldeep S. Sangha
Original Research Article


Ecological intensification through organic farming is known to have an influence on plant communities and diversity of insects associated with them. The comparative abundance of natural enemies was studied in organically as well as conventionally (chemical control) grown aromatic rice at farmer’s field during 2015–2016 and 2016–2017. Different life stages, i.e., egg, larvae and pupae of rice stem borer, and leaf folder, were collected and brought to the laboratory to record natural parasitism in both organic and conventional fields. The population of predators was recorded through sweep nets. The population of spiders was recorded using pitfall traps and sweep net. A total of nine parasitoid species including 3 egg parasitoids (T. chilonis, T. japonicum, and Telenomus sp.), 3 larval parasitoids (Stenobracon nicevillei, Bracon sp., and Cotesia sp.), and 3 pupal parasitoids (Tetrastichus sp., Brachymeria sp., and Xanthopimpla sp.) were recorded. However, the natural parasitism by these parasitoids was significantly higher in organic than conventional rice. Similarly, the population of predators like spiders, dragonflies, and damselflies was significantly higher in organic fields than in conventional fields. The study highlights the significance of conservation of these natural enemies for a sustainable system of rice insect pest management.


Aromatic rice Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Parasitism Scirpophaga incertulas 



Authors are grateful to Head, Department of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana and Director, ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bangalore, India, for their support and encouragement during the course of this study. The interest and support of the paddy farmer in the smooth conduct of experiments and motivating nearby farmers is duly acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Aggarwal N, Sharma S, Jalali SK (2016) On-farm impact of biocontrol technology against rice stem borer, Scircophaga incertulas (Walker) and rice leaf folder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenee) in aromatic rice. Entomol Gen 36:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APEDA (2018) Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority. Assessed October 7, 2018
  3. Bengtsson J, Ahnstrom J, Weibull AC (2005) The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 42:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bianchi FJJA, Booij CJH, Tscharntke T (2006) Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proc Royal Soc B-Biol Sci 273:1715–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP, Daily GC, Loreau M, Grace JB, Larigauderie A, Srivastava DS, Naeem S (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chakraborty K (2012) Relative composition of egg parasitoid species of yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas Wlk. in paddy field at Uttar Dinajpur, West Bengal, India. Curr Biotica 6:42–52Google Scholar
  7. Crowder DW, Harwood JD (2014) Promoting biological control in a rapidly changing world. Biol Control 75:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crowder DW, Northfield TD, Strand MR, Snyder WE (2010) Organic agriculture promotes evenness and natural pest control. Nature 466:109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garibaldi LA, Gemmill-Herren B, D’Annolfo R, Graeub BE, Cunningham SA, Breeze TD (2017) Farming approaches for greater biodiversity, livelihoods, and food security. Trends Ecol Evol 32:68–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibson RH, Pearce S, Morris RJ, Symondson WOC, Memmott J (2007) Plant diversity and land use under organic and conventional agriculture: a whole-farm approach. J Appl Ecol 44:792–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gnanakumar M, Rajmohana K, Bijoy C, Balan D, Nishi R (2012) Diversity of hymenopteran egg parasitoids in organic and conventional paddy ecosystems. Trop Agri Res 23:300–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Godfray HCJ (2015) The debate over sustainable intensification. Food Secur 7:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York, USA. Google Scholar
  14. Heong KL, Manza A, Catindig J, Villareal S, Jacobsen T (2007) Changes in pesticide use and arthropod biodiversity in the IRRI research farm. Outlooks Pest Mgmt 18:229–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources (2013) Factsheets of Agriculturally Important Insects. Assessed January 5, 2018
  16. IRRI (2018) World rice statistics. http://ricestat.irri. org/mistig/demos/php/global.php. Assessed November 17, 2018
  17. Kalode MB (2005) Insect pests of rice and their management. Today and Tomorrow Printers and Publishers, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  18. Lakshmi VJ, Surekha K, Pasalu IC (2010) Parasitization of rice yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker) egg masses. Ann Pl Prot Sci 18:366–369Google Scholar
  19. Ricepedia (2018) Rice productivity. Assessed November 9, 2018
  20. Schmidt MH, Thies C, Nentwig W, Tscharntke T (2008) Contrasting response of arable spiders to the landscape matrix at different spatial scales. J Biogeogr 35:157–166Google Scholar
  21. Sharma S, Aggarwal N (2016) Natural parasitism of lepidopteran insect pests in organic and conventionally managed basmati rice in Punjab. Vegetos 29:26–29Google Scholar
  22. Thies C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2008) Inter-annual landscape changes influence plant-herbivore-parasitoid interactions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 125:266–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tscharntke T, Bommarco R, Clough Y, Crist TO, Kleijn D, Rand TA, Vidal S (2007) Conservation biological control and natural enemy diversity on a landscape scale. Biol Control 43:294–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tuck SL, Winqvist C, Mota F, Ahnstrom J, Turnbull LA, Bengtsson J (2014) Land-use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: a hierarchical meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 51:746–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. USDA-FAS (2018) World agricultural production. online/ circulars/production.pdf. Assessed November 17, 2018
  26. Wang HY, Yang Y, Su JY, Shen JL, Gao CF, Zhu YC (2008) Assessment of the impact of insecticides on Anagrus nilaparvatae (Pang et Wang) (Hymenoptera: Mymanidae), an egg parasitoid of the rice planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Crop Prot 27:514–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilby A, Thomas MB (2002) Natural enemy diversity and pest control: patterns of pest emergence with agricultural intensification. Ecol Lett 5:353–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© African Association of Insect Scientists 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EntomologyPunjab Agricultural UniversityLudhianaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Forestry & Natural ResourcesPunjab Agricultural UniversityLudhianaIndia

Personalised recommendations