pp 1–8 | Cite as

Mitigation of drought stress in wheat crop by drought tolerant endophytic bacterial isolates

  • MeenakshiEmail author
  • K. Annapurna
  • V. Govindasamy
  • Varma Ajit
  • D. K. Choudhary
Research Articles


Bacteria with potential to alleviate abiotic stresses in combination with plant growth promotion are extremely useful in sustainable agriculture. The present study involves the isolation and evaluation of 14 bacterial isolates obtained from four upland rice roots in varying concentrations of PEG-6000. Three potential isolates MKA2, MKA3 and MKA4 were selected for further experiments. A pot experiment was conducted with four treatments under well watered and drought conditions. Water deficit treatment was imposed by reducing the amount of water added to 25% of the field capacity. Twenty days post stress results showed that drought stress affected the physiological and biochemical parameters of uninoculated wheat seedlings. Inoculation with the three bacterial isolates diluted the adverse effects of drought on relative water content and membrane stability index, and thus improved the water use efficiency over the uninoculated control. Inoculation also improved the shoot and root biomass of wheat plants in comparison to uninoculated control treatment under drought stress. Increased levels of super oxide dismutase and catalase activities were observed in treated plants as compared to control plants thus protecting the plants from oxidative damage. Thus, these potent bacterial isolates could be used effectively to ameliorate plant water intake efficiency and improve sustainability in wheat crop under drought conditions.


Drought tolerant endophytic bacteria Ameliorate Drought stress Field capacity 



This work was partially supported by the project granted by Indian Council of Agricultural Research—Incentivizing Research in Agriculture on Biological Nitrogen fixation ICAR-BNF, IARI. The first author is thankful to Division of Microbiology, ICAR—Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India for research facilities.


  1. Abbasi S, Zahedi H, Sadeghipour O, Akbari R (2013) Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on physiological parameters and nitrogen content of soybean grown under different irrigation regimes. Res Crops 14:798–803Google Scholar
  2. Aebi H (1974) Catalase in bergmeyer hans ulrich. Methods of enzymatic analysis, 5th edn. Academic Press Incorporated, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali A, Ali N, Ullah N, Ullah F, Adnan M, Ahmed ZS (2013) Effect of drought stress on the physiology and yield of the Pakistani wheat germplasms. Int J Adv Res Technol 2:419–430Google Scholar
  4. Apel K, Hirt H (2004) Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:373–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arau JL, Slafer GA, Royo C, Serret MD (2008) Breeding for yield potential and stress adaptation in cereals. Crit Rev Plant Sci 27:377–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Armada E, Roldan A, Azcon R (2014) Differential activity of autochthonous bacteria in controlling drought stress in native Lavandula and Salvia plants species under drought conditions in natural arid soil. Microb Ecol 67:410–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Asada K, Takahashi M (1987) Production and scavenging of active oxygen in photosynthesis. In: Kyle DJ, Osmond CB, Arntzen CJ (eds) Photoinhibition. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 227–287Google Scholar
  8. Ashraf M, Hasnain S, Berge O, Mahmood T (2004) Inoculating wheat seedling with exopolysaccharide producing bacteria restricts sodium uptake and stimulates plant growth under salt stress. Biol Fert Soils 40:157–162Google Scholar
  9. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beck EH, Fettig S, Knake C, Hartig K, Bhattarai T (2007) Specific and unspecific responses of plants to cold and drought stress. J Biosci 32:501–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Claussen W (2005) Proline as a measure of stress in tomato plants. Plant Sci 168:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Creus CM, Sueldo RJ, Barassi CA (2004) Water relations and yield in Azospirillum inoculated wheat exposed to drought in the field. Can J Bot 82:273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dardanelli MS, Fernandez de Cordoba FJ, Rosario Espuny M, Rodriguez Carvajal MA, Soria Diaz ME, Gil Serrano AM, Okon Y, Megias M (2008) Effect of Azospirillum brasilense coinoculated with Rhizobium on Phaseolus vulgaris flavonoids and Nod factor production under salt stress. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2713–2721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dhindsa RS, Plumb-Dhindsa P, Thorpe TA (1981) Leaf senescence correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. J Exp Bot 32:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Editorial (2010) How to feed a hungry world. Nature 466:531–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujeta D, Basra SMA (2009) Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev 29:185–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glick BR, Liu C, Ghosh S, Dumbroff EB (1997) The effect of the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2 on the development of canola seedlings subjected to various stresses. Soil Biol Biochem 29:12331239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glick BR, Cheng Z, Czarny J, Duan J (2007) Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria. In: Bakker PAH, Raaijmakers J, Lemanceau P, Bloemberg G (eds) New perspectives and approaches in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria research. Springer, Netherlands, pp 329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gou W, Tian L, Ruan Z, Zheng P, Chen F, Zhang L, Cui Z, Zheng P, Li Z, Gao M, Shi W, Zhang L, Liu J, Hu J (2015) Accumulation of choline and glycine betaine and drought stress tolerance induced in maize (Zea mays) by three plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains. Pak J Bot 47:581–586Google Scholar
  20. Gusain YS, Singh US, Sharma AK (2015) Bacterial mediated amelioration of drought stress in drought tolerant and susceptible cultivars of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Afr J Biotechnol 14:764–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kanwal S, Ilyas N, Ahmad B, Batool N, Arshad M (2016) Alleviation of drought stress in wheat by combined application of PGPR, compost and mineral fertilizer in wheat. J Plant Nutr. Google Scholar
  22. Kohler J (2008) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi modify alleviation biochemical mechanisms in water-stressed plants. Funct Plant Biol 35:141151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawlor DW, Cornic G (2002) Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant, Cell Environ 25:275-24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mancosu N, Snyder RL, Kyriakakis G, Spano D (2015) Water scarcity and future challenges for food production. Water 7:975–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marulanda A, Porcel R, Barea JM, Azco´ n R (2007) Drought tolerance and antioxidant activities in lavender plants colonized by native drought-tolerant or drought-sensitive Glomus species. Microb Ecol 54:543552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marulanda A, Azco´n R, Ruı´z-Lozano JM, Aroca R (2008) Differential effects of a Bacillus megaterium strain on Lactuca sativa plant growth depending on the origin of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus coinoculated: physiologic and biochemical traits. J Plant Growth Regul 27:1018Google Scholar
  27. Marulanda A, Barea JM, Azcón RJ (2009) Stimulation of plant growth and drought tolerance by native microorganisms (AM fungi and bacteria) from dry environments: mechanisms related to bacterial effectiveness. J Plant Growth Regul 28:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick B (2004) Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 42:56–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller G, Susuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R (2010) Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signaling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ 33:453–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mittler R (2002) Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 7:405–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nadeem SM, Zahir ZA, Naveed M, Arshad M (2007) Preliminary investigations on inducing salt tolerance in maize through inoculation with rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminase activity. Can J Microbiol 53:1141–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Okuyama LA, Federizzi LC, Barbosaneto JF (2004) Correlation and path analysis of yield and its components and plant traits in wheat. Ciência Rural 34:1701–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sairam RK (1994) Effect of moisture stress on physiological activities of two contrasting wheat genotypes. Indian J Exp Biol 32:594–597Google Scholar
  34. Sandhya V, SkZ A, Grover M, Reddy G, Venkateswaralu B (2010) Effect of plant growth promoting Pseudomonas spp. on compatible solutes antioxidant status and plant growth of maize under drought stress. Plant Growth Regul 62:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shintu PV, Jayaram KM (2015) Phosphate solubilizing bacteria (Bacillus polymyxa)—an effective approach to mitigate drought in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Trop Plant Res 2:17–22Google Scholar
  36. Singh RP, Jha PN (2017) The PGPR Stenotrophomonas maltophilia SBP-9 augments resistance against biotic and abiotic stress in wheat plants. Front Microbiol. Google Scholar
  37. Smith IK, Vierheller TL, Thorne CA (1988) Assay of glutathione reductase in crude tissue homogenates using 5,5′-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid). Anal Biochem 175:408–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Timmusk S, Wagner EGH (1999) The plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Paenibacillus polymyxa induces changes in Arabidopsis thaliana gene expression: a possible connection between biotic and abiotic stress responses. Mol Plant-Microb Interact 12:951959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vieira da Silva J, Naylor AW, Kramer PJ (1974) Some ultrastructural and enzymatic effects of drought stress in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) leaves. Proc Natl Acad Sci 71:3243–3324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang J, Kloepper JW, Ryu CM (2009) Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress. Trends Plant Sci 14:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang H, Murzello C, Sun Y, Kim X, Mi-S R, Jeter RM, Zak JC, Scot Dowd E, Pare PW (2010) Choline and osmotic-stress tolerance induced in Arabidopsis by the soil microbe Bacillus subtilis (GB03). Mol Plant Microb Interact 23:1097–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Plant Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Amity Institute of Microbial TechnologyAmity UniversityNoidaIndia
  2. 2.Division of MicrobiologyIndian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations