, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 223–226 | Cite as

Cross inoculation with beneficial Rhizobium strain promotes plant growth in Vigna mungo

  • Shweta Chaudhary
  • Dipjyoti ChakrabortyEmail author
Short Communications


Inoculation with beneficial microorganisms facilitates plant growth and is an alternative to chemical fertilizers for sustainable agriculture. In the present study, cross inoculation of Rhizobium aegyptiacum, an osmotolarant bacterial strain enhances growth in Vigna mungo cv. T9, a widely cultivated variety. In cross inoculated T9 plants, the stem length is increased in comparison to uninoculated plants and plants inoculated with the native Bradyrhizobium sp. Both the fresh weight and dry weight of root and shoot is higher in R. aegyptiacum inoculated plants as compared to Bradyrhizobium inoculated plants. Thus, R. aegyptiacum can be successfully cross inoculated in drought susceptible agronomically desirable black gram varieties for better growth.


Cross inoculation Plant growth promotion Rhizobium aegyptiacum Vigna mungo cv. T9 



The authors thank Professor Aditya Shastri, Vice Chancellor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India for providing necessary facilities. The authors acknowledge DST-CURIE for Equipment.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

42535_2019_26_MOESM1_ESM.docx (491 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 490 kb)


  1. Ahmad I, Hayat S, Ahmad A, Inam A (2001) Metal and antibiotic resistance traits in Bradyrhizobium sp. (cajanus) isolated from soil receiving oil refinery wastewater. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 17:379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akhtar MS, Siddiqui ZA (2009) Use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for the biocontrol of root rot disease complex of chickpea. Aust Plant Pathol 38:44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambede JG, Netondo GW, Mwai GN, Musyimi DM (2012) NaCl salinity affects germination, growth, physiology and biochemistry. Braz J Plant Physiol 24(3):151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouraoui M, Abbes Z, Rouissi M, Abdi N, Hemissi I, Kouki S, Sifi B (2016) Effect of rhizobia inoculation, N and P supply on Orobanche foetida parasitizing faba bean (Vicia faba minor) under field conditions. Biocontrol Sci Technol 26(6):776–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chakraborty D, Mandal SM (2008) Fractional changes in phenolic acids composition in root nodules of Arachis hypogaea L. Plant Growth Regul 55:159–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaudhary S, Chakraborty D (2019) Screening of Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper varieties under drought stress. Plant Cell Biotechnol Mol Biol. 20(1–2):35–46Google Scholar
  7. Datta A, Singh RK, Kumar S, Kumar S (2015) An effective and beneficial plant growth promoting soil bacterium “Rhizobium”: a review. Ann Plant Sci 4(1):933–942Google Scholar
  8. De Souza R, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LM (2015) Plant growth-promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils. Gen Mol Biol 38(4):401–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dutta P, Karmakar A, Majumdar S, Roy S (2018) Klebsiella pneumoniae (HR1) assisted alleviation of Cd (II) toxicity in Vigna mungo: a case study of biosorption of heavy metal by an endophytic bacterium coupled with plant growth promotion. Euro-Mediterr J Environ Int 3(1):27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gyaneshwar P (1999) Involvement of a phosphate starvation inducible glucose dehydrogenase in soil phosphate solubilisation by Enterobacter asburiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 171:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hossain D, Solaiman ARM (2004) Performance of mungbean varieties as affected by Rhizobium inoculants. Bull Inst Trop Agric 27:35–43Google Scholar
  12. Howieson J, Malden J, Yates R, Hara G (2000) Techniques for selection and development of elite inoculant strain of Rhizobium leguminosarum in South Australia. Symbiosis. 28:33–48Google Scholar
  13. Hussain A, Ali A, Khaliq T, Ahmed A, Aslam Z, Asif M (2014) Growth nodulation and yield components of mungbean (Vigna radiata) as affected by phosphorous in combination with rhizhobium inoculation. Afr J Agri Res 9(30):2319–2323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iqbal R, Mahmood A (1992) Response of Leucaena leucocephala to inoculation with rhizobia from tropical legumes. Pak J Bot 24:153–156Google Scholar
  15. Khetran AS, Ahmed M, Jakhro MI, Rahujo ZA, Jamali MH, Naseer NS and Sadiq N (2018) 34. Production efficiency of mung bean (Vigna radiate L.) through seed inoculation and NP application in Balochistan. Pure Appl Biol 7(2):700–705Google Scholar
  16. Kumari D, Chakraborty D (2017) Drought stress mitigation in Vigna radiata by the application of root-nodulating bacteria. Plant Sci Today 4(4):209–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mahmood A, Athar M (2008) Cross inoculation studies: response of Vigna mungo to inoculation with rhizobia from tree legumes growing under arid Environment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 5(1):135–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mandal SM, Chakraborty D, Dey S (2010) Phenolic acids act as signaling molecules in plant-microbe symbioses. Plant Signal Behav 5(4):359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martinez-Toledo MV, Gonzalez-Lopez J, De la Rubia T, Moreno J, Ramos-Ormenzana A (1988) Effect of inoculation with Azotobacter chroococcum on nitrogenase activity of Zea mays roots grown in agricultural soils under aseptic and non-sterile conditions. Biol Fertil Soils 6:170–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Perez-Montano F, Alías-Villegas C, Bellogín RA, del Cerro P, Espuny MR, Jimenez-Guerrero I, Lopez-Baena FJ, Ollero FJ, Cubo T (2014) Plant growth promotion in cereal and leguminous agricultural important plants: from microorganism capacities to crop production. Microbiol Res 169(5):325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Siddiqui IA, Shaukat SS (2002) Mixtures of plant disease suppressive bacteria enhance biological control of multiple tomato pathogens. Biol Fertil Soils 36(4):260–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Solaiman ARM, Rabbani MG (2004) Effects of Rhizobium inoculant and nitrogen application on pea. Bangladesh J Microbiol 21(1):36–41Google Scholar
  23. Souframanien J, Gopalakrishna T (2006) ISSR and SCAR markers linked to the mungbean yellow mosaic virus (MYMV) resistance gene in blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Plant Breeding 125:619–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sumithra P, Manikandan T (2016) Studies on isolation and identification of Rhizobium from agricultural soil and its effect on Vigna mungo, in pot culture experiments. Int J Res Medical Sci 3:37–49Google Scholar
  25. Taylor SR, Weaver BD, Wood WC, Edzard SV (2005) Nitrogen application increases yield and early dry matter accumulation in late-planted soybean. Crop Sci 45:854–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Youseif SH, Fayrouz H, El-Megeed A, Saleh SA (2017) Improvement of Faba Bean yield using Rhizobium/Agrobacterium inoculant in low-fertility sandy soil. Agronomy 7:2–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zahran HH (2001) Rhizobia from wild legumes: diversity, taxonomy, ecology, nitrogen fixation and biotechnology. J Biotechnol 91:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Plant Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Bioscience and BiotechnologyBanasthali VidyapithVanasthaliIndia

Personalised recommendations