Advertisement

Vegetos

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 151–157 | Cite as

Functional traits differences of Cyclosorus afer (Christ) Ching. in some wetlands: a potential invasive fern

  • Gbenga Festus AkomolafeEmail author
  • Zakaria Bin Rahmad
Research Articles
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Invasive plants are known to possess significant morphological and physiological traits which influence their impacts and disruption of ecosystem processes, even in the presence of natives. In this study, we assessed the functional traits of a potential invasive tropical fern Cyclosorus afer which has colonized most wetlands in some parts of Nigeria. We selected three wetlands of 500 m × 500 m and separated by 1000 m from each other. In each site, we determined the functional trait differences using 10 consecutive 1.5 m by 1.5 m quadrants located at 10 m intervals along a single 200 m transect at the peak of the growing season. These traits including whole plant, foliar and stipe traits explain its potential for efficient resource acquisition and usage in the habitats. Principal component analysis with varimax rotation was carried out on the traits to determine axis of specialization/drivers of its invasion in the wetlands. The results revealed that C. afer utilize different functional traits as its drivers in the three wetlands. Leaflet fresh weight, plant height, number of leaflets and leaf dry matter content (LDMC) are drivers in site 1; leaflet fresh weight, LDMC and plant height in site 2; leaflet fresh weight, SLA and number of leaflets in site 3. These traits are indicators of its high competitive ability, low inflammability and efficient acquisition and usage of resources. The possession of underground rhizome by this plant has also been observed as aiding its rapid horizontal expansion in unfavourable seasons.

Keywords

Cyclosorus afer Functional traits Invasive plants Lafia Wetlands 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Nigerian Government Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund) ASTD PhD Grant (FUL/REG/TETfund/002/VOL.II/182) for financially supporting this study.

References

  1. Akomolafe G, Rahmad Z (2018) A review on global ferns invasions: mechanisms, management and control. J Res For Wildl Environ 10(3):42–54Google Scholar
  2. Akomolafe G, Oloyede F, Chukwu A (2017) Proximate composition and preliminary allelopathic effect of a tropical fern, Cyclosorus Afer on Oryza sativa. Scientia 20(3):81–85Google Scholar
  3. Alpert P, Bone E, Holzapfel C (2000) Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 3(1):52–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bossdorf O, Lipowsky A, Prati D (2008) Selection of preadapted populations allowed Senecio inaequidens to invade Central Europe. Divers Distrib 14(4):676–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castro-Díez P, Puyravaud J, Cornelissen J (2000) Leaf structure and anatomy as related to leaf mass per area variation in seedlings of a wide range of woody plant species and types. Oecologia 124(4):476–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cornelissen J, Diez PC, Hunt R (1996) Seedling growth, allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types. J Ecol 84(5):755–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cornelissen J, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Diaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich D, Reich P, Ter Steege H, Morgan H, Van Der Heijden M (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 51(4):335–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Craine JM, Lee WG, Bond WJ, Williams RJ, Johnson LC (2005) Environmental constraints on a global relationship among leaf and root traits of grasses. Ecology 86(1):12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeMalach N, Zaady E, Kadmon R (2017) Light asymmetry explains the effect of nutrient enrichment on grassland diversity. Ecol Lett 20(1):60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Devictor V, Clavel J, Julliard R, Lavergne S, Mouillot D, Thuiller W, Venail P, Villeger S, Mouquet N (2010) Defining and measuring ecological specialization. J Appl Ecol 47(1):15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drenovsky RE, Grewell BJ, D’antonio CM, Funk JL, James JJ, Molinari N, Parker IM, Richards CL (2012) A functional trait perspective on plant invasion. Ann Bot 110(1):141–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dwyer JM, Hobbs RJ, Mayfield MM (2014) Specific leaf area responses to environmental gradients through space and time. Ecology 95(2):399–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehrenfeld JG (2010) Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:59–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellenberg H, Mueller Dombois D (1967) A key to Raunkiaer plant life forms with revised subdivisions. Ber geobot Inst eidg tech Hochschule Rubel 37:56–73Google Scholar
  15. Funk JL, Cleland EE, Suding KN, Zavaleta ES (2008) Restoration through reassembly: plant traits and invasion resistance. Trends Ecol Evol 23(12):695–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gallagher R, Randall R, Leishman M (2015) Trait differences between naturalized and invasive plant species independent of residence time and phylogeny. Conserv Biol 29(2):360–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garnier E, Shipley B, Roumet C, Laurent G (2001) A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content. Funct Ecol 15(5):688–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grime J (2001) Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  19. Gross N, Suding K, Lavorel S, Roumet C (2007a) Complementarity as a mechanism of coexistence between functional groups of grasses. J Ecol 95(6):1296–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gross N, Suding KN, Lavorel S (2007b) Leaf dry matter content and lateral spread predict response to land use change for six subalpine grassland species. J Veg Sci 18(2):289–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gross N, Börger L, Duncan RP, Hulme PE (2013a) Functional differences between alien and native species: do biotic interactions determine the functional structure of highly invaded grasslands? Funct Ecol 27(5):1262–1272.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gross N, Börger L, Soriano-Morales SI, Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y, Quero JL, García-Gómez M, Valencia-Gómez E, Maestre FT (2013b) Uncovering multiscale effects of aridity and biotic interactions on the functional structure of Mediterranean shrublands. J Ecol 101(3):637–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hamilton MA, Murray BR, Cadotte MW, Hose GC, Baker AC, Harris CJ, Licari D (2005) Life-history correlates of plant invasiveness at regional and continental scales. Ecol Lett 8(10):1066–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Higgins SI, Bond WJ, Trollope WS (2000) Fire, resprouting and variability: a recipe for grass–tree coexistence in savanna. J Ecol 88(2):213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kardel F, Wuyts K, Babanezhad M, Wuytack T, Potters G, Samson R (2010) Assessing urban habitat quality based on specific leaf area and stomatal characteristics of Plantago lanceolata L. Environ Pollut 158(3):788–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klimeš L, Klimešová J (2000) Plant rarity and the type of clonal growth. Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschutz 9:43–52Google Scholar
  27. Lavorel S, Garnier É (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct Ecol 16(5):545–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. LeBel P, Bradley RL, Thiffault N (2013) The relative importance of nitrogen vs. moisture stress may drive intraspecific variations in the SLA-RGR relationship: the case of Picea mariana seedlings. Am J Plant Sci 4(06):1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leishman MR, Thomson VP, Cooke J (2010) Native and exotic invasive plants have fundamentally similar carbon capture strategies. J Ecol 98(1):28–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mack RN, Simberloff D, Mark Lonsdale W, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10(3):689–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marteinsdóttir B, Eriksson O (2014) Plant community assembly in semi-natural grasslands and ex-arable fields: a trait-based approach. J Veg Sci 25(1):77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matzek V (2012) Trait values, not trait plasticity, best explain invasive species’ performance in a changing environment. PLoS One 7(10):e48821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meng F, Cao R, Yang D, Niklas KJ, Sun S (2014) Trade-offs between light interception and leaf water shedding: a comparison of shade-and sun-adapted species in a subtropical rainforest. Oecologia 174(1):13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mouillot D, Mason NW, Wilson JB (2007) Is the abundance of species determined by their functional traits? A new method with a test using plant communities. Oecologia 152(4):729–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Raunkiaer C (1934) The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography; being the collected papers of C. Raunkiaer. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography; being the collected papers of C RaunkiaerGoogle Scholar
  36. Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32(1):305–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scharfy D, Funk A, Olde Venterink H, Güsewell S (2011) Invasive forbs differ functionally from native graminoids, but are similar to native forbs. New Phytol 189(3):818–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shipley B (2010) From plant traits to vegetation structure: chance and selection in the assembly of ecological communities. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith MD, Knapp AK (2001) Physiological and morphological traits of exotic, invasive exotic, and native plant species in tallgrass prairie. Int J Plant Sci 162(4):785–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sternberg M (2016) From America to the holy land: disentangling plant traits of the invasive Heterotheca subaxillaris (Lam.) Britton & Rusby. Plant Ecol 217(11):1307–1314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tecco PA, Díaz S, Cabido M, Urcelay C (2010) Functional traits of alien plants across contrasting climatic and land-use regimes: do aliens join the locals or try harder than them? J Ecol 98(1):17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Theoharides KA, Dukes JS (2007) Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol 176(2):256–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thomson FJ, Moles AT, Auld TD, Kingsford RT (2011) Seed dispersal distance is more strongly correlated with plant height than with seed mass. J Ecol 99(6):1299–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vile D, Shipley B, Garnier E (2006) A structural equation model to integrate changes in functional strategies during old-field succession. Ecology 87(2):504–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Violle C, Navas ML, Vile D, Kazakou E, Fortunel C, Hummel I, Garnier E (2007) Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116(5):882–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang C, Zhou J, Xiao H, Liu J, Wang L (2017) Variations in leaf functional traits among plant species grouped by growth and leaf types in Zhenjiang, China. J For Res 28(2):241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang C, Wu B, Jiang K, Zhou J (2018) Effects of different types of heavy metal pollution on functional traits of invasive redroot pigweed and native red Amaranth. Int J Environ Res 12(4):419–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weiher E, van der Werf A, Thompson K, Roderick M, Garnier E, Eriksson O (1999) Challenging Theophrastus: a common core list of plant traits for functional ecology. J Veg Sci 10(5):609–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Westoby M, Warton D, Reich PB (2000) The time value of leaf area. Am Nat 155(5):649–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ (2002) Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33(1):125–159.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wright IJ, Westoby M (2002) Leaves at low versus high rainfall: coordination of structure, lifespan and physiology. New Phytol 155(3):403–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JH, Diemer M (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428(6985):821CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Plant Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversity Sains MalaysiaGelugorMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of BotanyFederal University LafiaLafiaNigeria
  3. 3.Center for Global Sustainability Studies (CGSS)Universiti Sains MalaysiaGelugorMalaysia

Personalised recommendations