Advertisement

Vegetos

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 124–129 | Cite as

Detection of diverse population of vegetative propagated Kinnow planting in western India

  • R. SharmaEmail author
  • J. N. Seemawat
  • S. Kumar
Short Communications
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Genetic diversity in 20 accessions of kinnow collected (five each) from four orchards viz., Central Institute of Arid Horticulture (CIAH), Bikaner, Agricultural Research Station, (ARS) Bikaner, ARS, Sriganaganagar and Regional Research Station (RRS), Abhohar were evaluated through RAPD analysis. Each of the 11 primers tested generated amplicons and out of a total of 69 amplicons produced 66 were polymorphic, with an average polymorphism of 95.60%. Two primers (OPG 4 and 11) produced a maximum 10 amplicons each that were all polymorphic. The Jaccard’s similarity coefficient recorded an average similarity of 0.51, ranging from 40% (CIAH, Bikaner) to 52% (ARS, Sriganganagar). In the SAHN clustering based on UPGMA algorithms out of the 20 accessions, 17 accessions grouped in two major clusters, two accessions (C and F) together with a high level diversity (almost 50%) into a third cluster while accession H remained outlier. The poor clustering of accessions from the same location indicated diverse genotypes which could have come from diverse basic material or chance seedlings or accumulation of mutations. The presence of diversity in the orchards could hamper realization of potential yield and uniformity of produce. The study thus clearly suggests need for purification and multiplication of desired types from the presently growing kinnow plantation.

Keywords

Citrus Genetic diversity Kinnow RAPD 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Director, CIAH, Bikaner for providing leaf samples for molecular analysis.

References

  1. Abkenar AA, Isshiki S (2003) Molecular characterization and genetic diversity among Japanese acid citrus (Citrus spp) based on RAPD markers. J Hortic Sci Biotech 78:108–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altaf N, Iqbal MM (2003) Towards a seedless cultivar of kinnow mandarin III. Variablity of developed and undeveloped seed number in seedless/low seeded fruits. Pak J Botany 35(3):339–342Google Scholar
  3. Altaf N, Rehman A (2008) Variation within kinnow (Citrus reticulata) and rough lemon (Citrus jabbheri). Pak J Bot 40:589–798Google Scholar
  4. Altaf N, Khan Abdul Rehman, Jafar H (2008a) Fruit variability in kinnow mandarin (citrus reticulata). Pak J Bot 40:599–604Google Scholar
  5. Altaf N, Khan AR, Ali L, Bhatti IA (2008b) Review of seedless kinnow project. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 3:785–788Google Scholar
  6. Altaf S, Khan MM, Jaskani MJ, Khan IA, Usman M, Sadias B, Awans SF, Ali A, Khan AI (2014) Morphogenetic characterization of seeded and seedless varieties of Kinnow mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco). Aust J Crop Sci 8:1542–1549Google Scholar
  7. Baig MNR, Grewal S, Dhillon S (2009) Molecular characterization and genetic diversity analysis of citrus cultivars by RAPD markers. Turk J Agric 33:375–384Google Scholar
  8. Campos ET, Espinosa MAG, Warburton ML, Varela AS, Monter AV (2005) Characterization of mandarin (Citrus spp.) using morphological and AFLP markers. Interciencia 30:687–693Google Scholar
  9. Coletta Filho HD, Machado MA, Targon MLPN, Moreira MCPQDG, Pompeu J Jr (1998) Analysis of the genetic diversity among mandarins (Citrus spp) using RAPD markers. Euphytica 102:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Das A, Mondal B, Sarkar J, Sarkar S (2004a) RAPD profiling of some elite clones of mandarin orange (Citrus reticulate Blanco) in the North Eastern Himalayan region of India. J Hortic Sci Biotech 79:850–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Das A, Sarkar J, Mondal B, Chaudhury S (2004b) Genetic diversity analysis of citrus cultivars and rootstocks of Northeastern India by RAPD markers. Indian J Genet 64:281–285Google Scholar
  12. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15Google Scholar
  13. Hvarleva T, Isaia IK, Papyinannins L, Atanassov A, Hadjinicoli A, Kyriakou A (2008) Characterization of citrus cultivars and clones in Cyprus through microsatellite and RAPD analysis. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 22:787–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jaccard P (1908) Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bull Soc Vaudoise des Sci Nat 44:223–270Google Scholar
  15. Jakhar RK, Singh AK, Kaswan PK, Kumawat N (2016) Effect of drip irrigation and plastic mulch on performance of kinnow and sweet orange grown in arid regions. The Bioscan 11(3):1663–1665Google Scholar
  16. Kaur H (2016) Morphological and molecular characterization of kinnow mutants and mandarins. M.Sc. thesis Submitted to the Punjab Agricultural University, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  17. Kumar S (2015) Effect of different rootstocks on Kinnow mandarin [Citrus nobilis Lour x Citrus deliciosa Tenora]. M.Sc. thesis submitted to the Indian Agricultural Research Institute, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar S, Parekh MJ, Fougat RS, Patel SK, Patel CB, Kumar M, Patel BR (2017) Assessment of genetic diversity among okra genotypes using SSR markers. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 26(2):172–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Longkumer M, Kabir J (2014) Genetic divergence of mandarin genotypes in Nagaland. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 74:115–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mariniello L, Sommella MG, Cozzolino A, Pierro PD, Ercolini D, Porta R (2005) Identification of campania Citrus lemon by random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Food Biotech 18:289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rohlf FJ (1998) NTSYS-pc Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system version. 2.02 f. Exeter Software, Setauket, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharma JN, Thind SK (2005) An approach for the establishment of seedlessness in Kinnow Mandarin. Indian J. Hort 62(1):8–11Google Scholar
  24. Tzarfati R, Ben-Dor S, Sela I, Goldschmidt EE (2013) Graft-induced changes in microRNA expression patterns in Citrus leaf petioles. Open Plant Sci J 7:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Plant Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plant Biotechnology CentreS.K. Rajasthan Agricultural UniversityBikanerIndia
  2. 2.Central Arid Zone Research InstituteJodhpurIndia
  3. 3.Department of Agri BiotechnologyAnand Agricultural UniversityAnandIndia

Personalised recommendations