Advertisement

Research on the ecological compensation standard of the basin pollution control project based on evolutionary game theory and by taking Xiangjiang River as a case

  • Dongbin Hu
  • Huiwu Liu
  • Xiaohong ChenEmail author
  • Yang Chen
Research Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Ecological compensation is a new resource and environment management model. As one of the main areas for implementing ecological compensation policies, basin ecological compensation has become an important measure for encouraging basin pollution control projects and improving the quality of regional economic development. By applying the basic game analysis of evolutionary game theory and building an evolutionary game model with a “reward—punishment” mechanism, this paper compares the interest-related decision-making behaviors of the upstream and downstream stakeholders of basin ecological compensation. By using data on the water quality of Xiangjiang River Basin, this paper calculates the rewards and penalties in different intervals by building a parametric regression mathematical model and employing the local linear regression method. Results show that a decline in water quality should be fined RMB 925500 yuan, an improvement in water quality should be awarded RMB 1227800 yuan, and a deteriorating water quality should be severely fined RMB 5087600 yuan.

Keywords

evolutionary game ecological compensation standard Xiangjiang River Basin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amigues J P, Boulatoff C, Desaigues B, Gauthier C, Keith J E (2002). The benefits and costs of riparian analysis habitat preservation: a willingness to accept/willingness to pay contingent valuation approach. Ecological Economics, 43(1): 17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biénabe E, Hearne R R (2006). Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and scenic beauty within a framework of environmental services payments. Forest Policy and Economics, 9(4): 335–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen Y P, Zhou Y (2016). Estimation of watershed ecological compensation standard based on water quality and water volume: Taking Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region in the Yellow River Basin as an example. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 37(4): 119–126MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Costanza R, D’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neil R V, Paruelo J, Raskin R G, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(15): 253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daily G C (1997). Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Du Q Q, Zhang R H, Ma B (2017). Study on the estimation of ecosystem service value and ecological compensation mechanism: Taking Huairou District of Beijing as an example. Ecological Economics, 33(11): 146–152, 176Google Scholar
  7. Guan X J, Liu W K, Chen M Y (2016). Study on the ecological compensation standard for river basin water environment based on total pollutants control. Ecological Indicators, 69: 446–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kong F B (2010). China’s Ecological Compensation Mechanism: Theory, Practice and Policy Design. Beijing: China Environmental Science PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Li C F, Zhang Y Y, Zhao G C, Mo L J (2014). Study on watershed ecological compensation based on evolutionary game theory: taking Taihu Lake Basin as an example. China Population Resources and Environment, 24(1): 171–176Google Scholar
  10. Li Y, Peng X C, Zhou L X (2012). Exploration of Watershed Ecological Compensation and Pollution Compensation Policies and Mechanisms: Taking Dongjiang River Basin as An Example. Beijing: Economy & Management Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
  11. Li Y S, Hu Y (2007). Analysis of interregional ecological benefit compensation standard in Minjiang River Basin. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 28(3): 327–329 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Moran D, Mcvittie A, Allcroft D J, Elston D A (2007). Quantifying public preferences for agri-environmental policy in Scotland: a comparison of methods. Ecological Economics, 63(1): 42–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Robert N, Stenger A (2013). Can payments solve the problem of undersupply of ecosystem services? Forest Policy and Economics, 35(4): 83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tian Y X, Dai Y (2016). Research on performance evaluation of watershed ecological compensation mechanism: taking Xiangjiang River as an Example. Business (Atlanta, GA), 2016(28): 104–105Google Scholar
  15. Villarroya A, Puig J (2010). Ecological compensation and environmental impact assessment in Spain. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(6): 357–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang L, Liu T (2017). Research on compensation of ecological protection in Dongting Lake. China Economic and Trade Guide (Theoretical Edition), 2017(35): 15–17Google Scholar
  17. Xu D W, Chang L, Hou T S, Zhao Y F (2012). Calculation of watershed ecological compensation standard based on WTP and WTA: a case study in Liaohe River Basin. Journal of Resources Science, 34(7): 1354–1361Google Scholar
  18. Yang G S, Huang J S, Li J, Yin W (2016). Study on ecological compensation standard of green water management based on SWAT model. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 47(6): 809–815Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dongbin Hu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Huiwu Liu
    • 1
  • Xiaohong Chen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Yang Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of BusinessCentral South UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.Resource-conserving & Environment-friendly Society and Ecological Civilization 2011 Collaborative Innovation Center of Hunan ProvinceCentral South UniversityChangshaChina
  3. 3.Institute of Big Data and Internet InnovationHunan University of CommerceChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations